scispace - formally typeset
P

Philip Darbyshire

Researcher at Monash University

Publications -  185
Citations -  5127

Philip Darbyshire is an academic researcher from Monash University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Nurse education & Health care. The author has an hindex of 32, co-authored 183 publications receiving 4746 citations. Previous affiliations of Philip Darbyshire include University of South Australia & Monash University, Clayton campus.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Multiple methods in qualitative research with children: more insight or just more?

TL;DR: The authors explored the research implications of using multi-methods within a broad qualitative approach by drawing on the experience of conducting two childhood obesity-focused qualitative studies of Australian children's perceptions and experiences of place, space and physical activity.
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of donor KIR and patient HLA-C genotypes on outcome following HLA-identical sibling hematopoietic stem cell transplantation for myeloid leukemia.

TL;DR: In HLA-matched sibling HSCT for myeloid leukemia, patients homozygous for C2 alleles receiving a graft from a donor carrying the KIR gene KIR2DS2 have a significantly reduced chance of survival.
Journal ArticleDOI

Donor KIR genotype has a major influence on the rate of cytomegalovirus reactivation following T-cell replete stem cell transplantation

TL;DR: In transplantations involving siblings where both donor and recipient were CMV seropositive, donors with more than one activating Kir gene were associated with a 65% reduction in CMV reactivation, indicating that activating KIRs play an important role in the cellular control of CMV reactsivation.
Journal ArticleDOI

‘Rage against the machine?’: nurses’ and midwives’ experiences of using Computerized Patient Information Systems for clinical information

TL;DR: Clinical nurses' and midwives' perceptions and understandings of computerized information systems in everyday practice were explored, and clinicians' experiences of using CPIS to manage clinical information were predominantly negative and mostly critical of CPIS.