P
Philippe Choné
Researcher at ENSAE ParisTech
Publications - 46
Citations - 863
Philippe Choné is an academic researcher from ENSAE ParisTech. The author has contributed to research in topics: Nonlinear pricing & Competition (economics). The author has an hindex of 14, co-authored 45 publications receiving 816 citations. Previous affiliations of Philippe Choné include INSEE & Center for Economic Studies.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Optimal incentives for labor force participation
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyze the optimal taxation under a Rawlsian criterion in an economy where the only decision of the agents is to participate, or not, to the labor force, and qualitatively show how the optimal incentive schemes depend on the underlying structure of the preferences.
Journal ArticleDOI
Optimal Health Care Contract under Physician Agency
TL;DR: This work model asymmetric information arising from physician agency and its effect on the design of payment and health care quantity and concludes that the optimal mechanism is interpreted as managed care where strict approval protocols are placed on treatments.
Posted Content
Female labor supply and child care in france
TL;DR: In this article, the authors used French household data to estimate a structural model of female labor supply and use of paid child care outside the home and found that child care costs are found to have little impact on the labor market participation decision of mothers.
Journal ArticleDOI
Assessing horizontal mergers under uncertain efficiency gains
Philippe Choné,Laurent Linnemer +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine the role of uncertainty in the tradeoff between unilateral effects and efficiency gains and show that convexity prevails in a number of situations, including the most general linear demand model.
Posted Content
Optimal Litigation Strategies with Signaling and Screening
TL;DR: The authors examines the strategic effects of case preparation in litigation and shows how the pretrial efforts incurred by one party may alter its adversary's incentives to settle, where the informed party first decides to invest, or not, in case preparation, and the uninformed party then makes a settlement offer.