P
Pierre Pluye
Researcher at McGill University
Publications - 161
Citations - 10944
Pierre Pluye is an academic researcher from McGill University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Medicine. The author has an hindex of 38, co-authored 143 publications receiving 8114 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) Version 2018 for Information Professionals and Researchers.
Quan Nha Hong,Sergi Fàbregues,Gillian Bartlett,Felicity K. Boardman,Margaret Cargo,Pierre Dagenais,Marie-Pierre Gagnon,Frances Griffiths,Belinda Nicolau,Alicia O’Cathain,Marie-Claude Rousseau,Isabelle Vedel,Pierre Pluye +12 more
TL;DR: The aim of this paper is to present the enhancements made to the Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), a unique tool that can be used to appraise the quality of different study designs and can provide a more efficient appraisal.
Journal ArticleDOI
Combining the Power of Stories and the Power of Numbers: Mixed Methods Research and Mixed Studies Reviews
Pierre Pluye,Quan Nha Hong +1 more
TL;DR: The epistemological background for mixed methods research and mixed studies reviews is presented and the main types of mixed methodsResearch designs and techniques as well as guidance for planning, conducting, and appraising mixed method research are presented.
Journal ArticleDOI
Testing the reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT) for systematic mixed studies review
Romina Pace,Pierre Pluye,Gillian Bartlett,Ann C. Macaulay,Jon Salsberg,Justin Jagosh,Robbyn Seller +6 more
TL;DR: The reliability and efficiency of the pilot Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool (MMAT), a pilot version of the mixed studies review (MSR), is promising, and encourages further development.
Journal ArticleDOI
A scoring system for appraising mixed methods research, and concomitantly appraising qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods primary studies in Mixed Studies Reviews.
TL;DR: A scoring system is proposed for concomitantly appraising the methodological quality of qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies for SMSRs and this scoring system may also be used to appraise the quantitative and qualitative quality of mixed methods research.
Journal ArticleDOI
Uncovering the Benefits of Participatory Research: Implications of a Realist Review for Health Research and Practice
Justin Jagosh,Ann C. Macaulay,Pierre Pluye,Jon Salsberg,Paula L. Bush,Jim Henderson,Erin Sirett,Geoff Wong,Margaret Cargo,Carol P. Herbert,Sarena D. Seifer,Lawrence W. Green,Trisha Greenhalgh +12 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors used the middle-range theory of partnership synergy to analyze and synthesize the data, using the PR partnership as the main unit of analysis, and identified mechanisms by which PR may add value to the research process.