scispace - formally typeset
P

Piers Beirne

Researcher at University of Southern Maine

Publications -  39
Citations -  1198

Piers Beirne is an academic researcher from University of Southern Maine. The author has contributed to research in topics: Green criminology & Poison control. The author has an hindex of 17, co-authored 38 publications receiving 1105 citations. Previous affiliations of Piers Beirne include University of Maine System.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

For a Nonspeciesist Criminology: Animal Abuse as An Object of Study *

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors consider a variety of arguments about why theory and research on animal abuse should be developed by criminologists and conclude that animal abuse is an important object of study for criminology not only sui generis but also because its presence may indicate or predict situations of interhuman violence.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rain Without Thunder: THE Ideology OF THE Animal Rights Movement

TL;DR: In this paper, Francione's latest book came out earlier this summer, and it's called "Animals as Persons: Essays on the Abolition of Animal Exploitation".
Book

Issues in Green Criminology: Confronting Harms against Environments, Humanity and Other Animals

Piers Beirne, +1 more
TL;DR: Green criminology has the potential to provide a different way of examining and making sense of various forms of crime and control responses (some well known, others less so) but can also make explicable much wider connections that are not generally well understood.
Journal ArticleDOI

Rethinking Bestiality:: Towards a Concept of Interspecies Sexual Assault

TL;DR: This article introduced a view of bestiality which differs radically from both the anthropocentrism enshrined in the dogma of Judaeo-Christianity and also from the pseudo-liberal tolerance fa...
Journal ArticleDOI

From Animal Abuse to Interhuman Violence? A Critical Review of the Progression Thesis

TL;DR: This article reviewed evidence of a progression from animal abuse to interhuman violence and found that the "progression thesis" is supported not by a coherent research program but by disparate studies often lacking methodological and conceptual clarity.