scispace - formally typeset
R

R. B. Mazess

Publications -  5
Citations -  2063

R. B. Mazess is an academic researcher. The author has contributed to research in topics: Senile osteoporosis & Femoral neck. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 5 publications receiving 2026 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Differential changes in bone mineral density of the appendicular and axial skeleton with aging: relationship to spinal osteoporosis.

TL;DR: Bone mineral density was measured in vivo at the lumbar spine (predominantly trabecular bone) by dual photon absorptiometry and at the midradius (greater than 95% cortical bone) and distal radius (75% cortical and 25% trabECular bone), by single photon absorptioniometry as mentioned in this paper.
Journal ArticleDOI

Changes in Bone Mineral Density of the Proximal Femur and Spine with Aging: DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POSTMENOPAUSAL AND SENILE OSTEOPOROSIS SYNDROMES

TL;DR: The data suggest the existence of two distinct syndromes: one form, "postmenopausal osteoporosis," is characterized by excessive and disproportionate trabecular bone loss, involves a small subset of women in the early postmenopausal period, and is associated with hip fractures or vertebral fractures or both.
Journal ArticleDOI

Dual-photon Gd-153 absorptiometry of bone.

TL;DR: Dual-photon absorptiometry accurately indicates bone mass and bone density and is only slightly affected by either surrounding tissue or fat changes in bone marrow.

Changes inBoneMineral Density oftheProximal Femur andSpine withAging DIFFERENCES BETWEEN THE POSTMENOPAUSAL AND SENILE OSTEOPOROSIS SYNDROMES

TL;DR: In this article, the authors measured the femur, lumbar spine, and the femoral neck of normal women and found that the regression of femoral density was negative and linear at each site.

Differential Changes inBoneMineral Density of theAppendicular andAxial Skeleton withAging

TL;DR: Meanbonemineral density waslower in patients withosteoporosis than inage-andsex-matched normal subjects at all three scanning sites, although spinal measurements dis- criminated best; however, there was considerable over- lap.