PURPOSE: To assess the accuracy of computed tomography (CT) in demonstrating the presence or absence of peritoneal violation and type of intraperitoneal organ injury, if any, in hemodynamically stable patients with penetrating torso trauma but without definite peritoneal signs or radiographic evidence of free intraperitoneal air. MATERIALS AND METHODS: During a 29-month period, helical CT with oral, rectal, and intravenous contrast material (triple-contrast) was performed in 200 hemodynamically stable patients, including 169 men (age range, 15–85 years; mean age, 31 years) and 31 women (age range, 17–45 years; mean age, 28 years) with penetrating torso trauma. The study group included 86 patients with gunshot wounds, 111 with stab wounds, and three impaled by sharp objects. CT scans were evaluated prospectively by three trauma radiologists for evidence of peritoneal violation to determine injury to intra- or retroperitoneal solid organs, bowel, mesentery, vascular structures, diaphragm, and urinary tract....

Penetrating torso trauma: triple-contrast helical CT in peritoneal violation and organ injury--a prospective study in 200 patients.

Background: The role of computed tomography in diagnosing hollow viscus injury after blunt abdominal trauma remains controversial, with previous studies reporting both high accuracy and poor results. This study was performed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of helical computed tomography in detecting bowel and mesenteric injuries after blunt abdominal trauma in a large cohort of patients. Methods: One hundred fifty patients were admitted to our Level I trauma center over a 4-year period with computed tomographic (CT) scan or surgical diagnosis of bowel or mesenteric injury. CT scan findings were retrospectively graded as negative, nonsurgical, or surgical bowel or mesenteric injury. The CT scan diagnosis was then compared with surgical findings, which were also graded as negative, nonsurgical, or surgical. Results: Computed tomography had an overall sensitivity of 94% in detecting bowel injury and 96% in detecting mesenteric injury. Surgical bowel cases were correctly differentiated in 64 of 74 cases (86%), and surgical mesenteric cases were correctly differentiated from nonsurgical in 57 of 76 cases (75%). Conclusion: Helical CT scanning is very accurate in detecting bowel and mesenteric injuries, as well as in determining the need for surgical exploration in bowel injuries. However, it is less accurate in predicting the need for surgical exploration in mesenteric injuries alone.

Helical computed tomography of bowel and mesenteric injuries.

Detection of bowel and mesenteric injury can be challenging in patients after blunt abdominal trauma. Early diagnosis and treatment are critical to decrease patient morbidity and mortality. Computed tomography (CT) has become the primary modality for the imaging of these patients. Signs of bowel perforation such as free air and contrast material are virtually pathognomonic. Bowel-wall thickening, free fluid, and mesenteric infiltration may be seen with this type of injury and partial thickness injuries. The authors present and discuss the range of CT findings seen with bowel and mesenteric injuries. Examples of observation and interpretation errors are also provided to highlight pitfalls encountered in the evaluation of abdominopelvic CT scans in patients after blunt trauma.

CT of Blunt Trauma Bowel and Mesenteric Injury: Typical Findings and Pitfalls in Diagnosis

Computed tomography is now widely used in the initial diagnostic workup of adult trauma victims with suspected intra-abdominal injuries. We review the role of CT in the detection and management of blunt visceral injuries in two parts. In the first part we discuss general aspects of performing CT in the setting of abdominal trauma and the diagnostic findings of intra-abdominal hemorrhage and blunt hepatic and splenic injuries. Hepatic and splenic injuries can be detected by means of CT with a high accuracy. The vast majority of hepatic injuries can be successfully managed conservatively, even when CT demonstrates parenchymal damage of more than three segments and major hemoperitoneum. Delayed complications, e. g., formation of biloma or a false aneurysm, can be readily detected on repeat CT studies, although they are quite uncommon. The outcome of conservative treatment of splenic injuries remains unpredictable because delayed splenic rupture may occur even when initial CT shows only minor parenchymal lesions and little or no intraperitoneal hemorrhage.

Blunt abdominal trauma in adults: role of CT in the diagnosis and management of visceral injuries. Part 1: liver and spleen.

OBJECTIVE. The objective of our study was to identify relevant and reliable CT signs of bowel injury, to determine the overall performance of CT in detection of bowel injuries, and to establish the effect of the training level of radiologists on this performance.MATERIALS AND METHODS. Abdominal CT scans of 112 patients with blunt abdominal trauma were prospectively and retrospectively reviewed. Fifty patients had proven bowel injuries (with or without other visceral injuries), whereas 62 patients had no bowel injury and comprised the comparison or control group. Thirty-one of the 62 patients in the comparison group had surgical proof of abdominal but not bowel or mesenteric injuries. The retrospective review of the 112 CT scans was performed randomly and individually by nine radiologists unaware of the diagnosis, including three faculty abdominal radiologists, three senior residents in training, and three junior residents in training. Individual performance and group performance were evaluated by receiver...

https://www.ajronline.org/doi/pdf/10.2214/ajr.176.1.1760129

Performance of CT in detection of bowel injury.

The purposes of this study were to determine the spectrum of CT findings of mesenteric injury, to compare CT findings of mesenteric injury with surgical observations, and to assess the potential of CT to predict which patients with mesenteric injury require laparotomy.Blunt trauma patients admitted to our facility during a 5-year 4-month period with a CT or surgical diagnosis of mesenteric injury were identified from a radiology database and trauma registry. Patients with CT findings of full-thickness bowel injury associated with mesenteric injury or diagnostic peritoneal lavage performed before CT were excluded. CT scans of all patients were retrospectively reviewed both with and without knowledge of surgical results. Medical records of all study patients were reviewed to ascertain admission physical findings and surgical results.Twenty-seven of 29 patients meeting the study criteria underwent laparotomy, and two others were managed conservatively. Among the 27 patients who had surgery. 24 (89%) had CT f...

/pdf/ct-findings-of-mesenteric-injury-after-blunt-trauma-4wpl8kckiz.pdf

CT Findings of Mesenteric Injury After Blunt Trauma: Implications for Surgical Intervention

Erratum to "Effect of Simulation-based Training on Surgical Proficiency and Patient Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Clinical and Educational Trial" [Eur Urol 2022;81:385-393].

R C Steiner

Papers

CT Findings of Mesenteric Injury After Blunt Trauma: Implications for Surgical Intervention

Erratum to "Effect of Simulation-based Training on Surgical Proficiency and Patient Outcomes: A Randomised Controlled Clinical and Educational Trial" [Eur Urol 2022;81:385-393].