A simple, rapid method for bacterial lysis and direct extraction of DNA from soils with minimal shearing was developed to address the risk of chimera formation from small template DNA during subsequent PCR. The method was based on lysis with a high-salt extraction buffer (1.5 M NaCl) and extended heating (2 to 3 h) of the soil suspension in the presence of sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS), hexadecyltrimethylammonium bromide, and proteinase K. The extraction method required 6 h and was tested on eight soils differing in organic carbon, clay content, and pH, including ones from which DNA extraction is difficult. The DNA fragment size in crude extracts from all soils was > 23 kb. Preliminary trials indicated that DNA recovery from two soils seeded with gram-negative bacteria was 92 to 99%. When the method was tested on all eight unseeded soils, microscopic examination of indigenous bacteria in soil pellets before and after extraction showed variable cell lysis efficiency (26 to 92%). Crude DNA yields from the eight soils ranged from 2.5 to 26.9 micrograms of DNA g-1, and these were positively correlated with the organic carbon content in the soil (r = 0.73). DNA yields from gram-positive bacteria from pure cultures were two to six times higher when the high-salt-SDS-heat method was combined with mortar-and-pestle grinding and freeze-thawing, and most DNA recovered was of high molecular weight. Four methods for purifying crude DNA were also evaluated for percent recovery, fragment size, speed, enzyme restriction, PCR amplification, and DNA-DNA hybridization. In general, all methods produced DNA pure enough for PCR amplification. Since soil type and microbial community characteristics will influence DNA recovery, this study provides guidance for choosing appropriate extraction and purification methods on the basis of experimental goals.

DNA recovery from soils of diverse composition.

Microbial degradation of hydrocarbons in the environment.

Factors that inhibit the amplification of nucleic acids by PCR are present with target DNAs from many sources. The inhibitors generally act at one or more of three essential points in the reaction in the following ways: they interfere with the cell lysis necessary for extraction of DNA, they interfere by nucleic acid degradation or capture, and they inhibit polymerase activity for amplification of target DNA. Although a wide range of inhibitors is reported, the identities and modes of action of many remain unclear. These effects may have important implications for clinical and public health investigations, especially if the investigations involve food and environmental screening. Common inhibitors include various components of body fluids and reagents encountered in clinical and forensic science (e.g., hemoglobin, urea, and heparin), food constituents (e.g., organic and phenolic compounds, glycogen, fats, and Ca 21 ), and environmental compounds (e.g., phenolic compounds, humic acids, and heavy metals). Other, more widespread inhibitors include constituents of bacterial cells, nontarget DNA and contaminants, and laboratory items such as pollen, glove powder, laboratory plasticware, and cellulose. This review discusses the findings of many studies related to clinical, food, and environmental microbiology, including approaches that have been used to overcome inhibition and facilitate amplification for detection and typing. Few areas of biological science remain untouched by the invention of PCR (34, 81, 99). Other methods for amplifying nucleic acids (72, 123), such as Qb replicase (18), ligase chain reaction (13, 128), single-stranded sequence replication (17, 47), strand displacement amplification (126, 127), and nucleic acid sequence-based amplification (23, 122), have been described, but these methods have received less attention. Problems sometimes occur with PCR, however (124). Despite early indications of great sensitivity, the sensitivity of PCR may be a negative aspect of the procedure, since the most commonly reported problem is false-positive results due to cross-contamination (98, 124). This problem can be overcome by UV irradiation (100), with sodium hypochlorite (92), and by photochemical or enzymic methods (25, 36, 40, 78). One problem that is less discussed is reaction inhibition. This may be total or partial and can manifest itself as complete reaction failure or as reduced sensitivity of detection. In some cases, inhibition may be the cause of false-negative reactions, since few workers incorporate internal controls in each reaction tube. Early evidence of exquisite sensitivity with mammalian cells (53) involving detection of a single molecule of DNA from a hair was not reproduced when PCR was applied to many microbial (and some mammalian) situations, where poor sensitivity, specificity, and reproducibility have been reported (16, 82, 86, 129, 132, 134). There may also be potentially important effects in PCR typing reactions (121), and difficulties can occur in post-PCR manipulation (61). Although systematic study of inhibition has seldom been the focus of published investigations, many workers have reported these effects in the course of other studies (12, 19, 21, 124, 129, 132, 133). Considering the prevalence of this problem, it is surprising that few systematic and mechanistic studies of PCR inhibition have been reported. Rossen et al. (97) contributed the most comprehensive study of PCR inhibition, identifying inhibitory factors in foods, bacterial culture media, and various chemical compounds. These inhibitory factors included organic and inorganic chemicals, detergents, antibiotics, buffers, enzymes, polysaccharides, fats, and proteins. This review lists and discusses inhibitors and methods that can overcome the attenuation of amplification in clinical, food, and environmental microbiology. It is beyond the scope of this paper to discuss in detail the various physical, enzymic, and chemical methods used in the extraction, purification, and quantitation of nucleic acids. Those methods are presented and discussed in commercial literature and elsewhere (14, 95, 96, 106, 134).

https://aem.asm.org/content/aem/63/10/3741.full.pdf

Inhibition and facilitation of nucleic acid amplification.

After nearly 10 years of PCR-based analysis of prokaryotic small-subunit ribosomal RNAs for ecological studies it seems necessary to summarize reported pitfalls of this approach which will most likely lead to an erroneous description on the microbial diversity of a given habitat. The following article will cover specific aspects of sample collection, cell lysis, nucleic acid extraction, PCR amplification, separation of amplified DNA, application of nucleic probes and data analysis.

Determination of microbial diversity in environmental samples: pitfalls of PCR‐based rRNA analysis

Soil bacterium DNA was isolated by minor modifications of previously described methods. After purification on hydroxyapatite and precipitation with cetylpyridinium bromide, the DNA was sheared in a French press to give fragments with an average molecular mass of 420,000 daltons. After repeated hydroxyapatite purification and precipitation with cetylpyridinium bromide, high-pressure liquid chromatography analysis showed the presence of 2.1% RNA or less, whereas 5-methylcytosine made up 2.9% of the total deoxycytidine content. No other unusual bases could be detected. The hyperchromicity was 31 to 36%, and the melting curve in 1 X SSC (0.15 M NaCl plus 0.015 M sodium citrate) corresponded to 58.3 mol% G+C. High-pressure liquid chromatography analysis of two DNA samples gave 58.6 and 60.8 mol% G+C. The heterogeneity of the DNA was determined by reassociation of single-stranded DNA, measured spectrophotometrically. Owing to the high complexity of the DNA, the reassociation had to be carried out in 6 X SSC with 30% dimethyl sulfoxide added. Cuvettes with a 1-mm light path were used, and the A275 was read. DNA concentrations as high as 950 micrograms ml-1 could be used, and the reassociation rate of Escherichia coli DNA was increased about 4.3-fold compared with standard conditions. C0t1/2 values were determined relative to that for E. coli DNA, whereas calf thymus DNA was reassociated for comparison. Our results show that the major part of DNA isolated from the bacterial fraction of soil is very heterogeneous, with a C0t1/2 about 4,600, corresponding to about 4,000 completely different genomes of standard soil bacteria.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS) Images

High diversity in DNA of soil bacteria.

Experiments were performed to evaluate the effectiveness of two different methodological approaches for recovering DNA from soil and sediment bacterial communities: cell extraction followed by lysis and DNA recovery (cell extraction method) versus direct cell lysis and alkaline extraction to recover DNA (direct lysis method). Efficiency of DNA recovery by each method was determined by spectrophotometric absorbance and using a tritiated thymidine tracer. With both procedures, the use of polyvinylpolypyrrolidone was important for the removal of humic compounds to improve the purity of the recovered DNA; without extensive purification, various restriction enzymes failed to cut added target DNA. Milligram quantities of high-purity DNA were recovered from 100-g samples of both soils and sediments by the direct lysis method, which was a greater than 1-order-of-magnitude-higher yield than by the cell extraction method. The ratio of labeled thymidine to total DNA, however, was higher in the DNA recovered by the cell extraction method. than by the direct lysis method, suggesting that the DNA recovered by the cell extraction method came primarily from active bacterial cells, whereas that recovered by the direct lysis method may have contained DNA from other sources.

Recovery of DNA from soils and sediments.

Polymerase chain reaction (PCR) amplification and gene probe detection of regions of two genes, lacZ and lamB, were tested for their abilities to detect coliform bacteria. Amplification of a segment of the coding region of Escherichia coli lacZ by using a PCR primer annealing temperature of 50 degrees C detected E. coli and other coliform bacteria (including Shigella spp.) but not Salmonella spp. and noncoliform bacteria. Amplification of a region of E. coli lamB by using a primer annealing temperature of 50 degrees C selectively detected E. coli and Salmonella and Shigella spp. PCR amplification and radiolabeled gene probes detected as little as 1 to 10 fg of genomic E. coli DNA and as a few as 1 to 5 viable E. coli cells in 100 ml of water. PCR amplification of lacZ and lamB provides a basis for a method to detect indicators of fecal contamination of water, and amplification of lamB in particular permits detection of E. coli and enteric pathogens (Salmonella and Shigella spp.) with the necessary specificity and sensitivity for monitoring the bacteriological quality of water so as to ensure the safety of water supplies. Images

/pdf/detection-of-coliform-bacteria-in-water-by-polymerase-chain-csw0nkqw7f.pdf

Detection of coliform bacteria in water by polymerase chain reaction and gene probes.

The polymerase chain reaction (PCR) was performed to amplify a 1.0-kilobase (kb) probe-specific region of DNA from the herbicide-degrading bacterium Pseudomonas cepacia AC1100 in order to increase the sensitivity of detecting the organism by dot-blot analysis. The 1.0-kb region was an integral portion of a larger 1.3-kb repeat sequence which is present as 15 to 20 copies on the P. cepacia AC1100 genome. PCR was performed by melting the target DNA, annealing 24-base oligonucleotide primers to unique sequences flanking the 1.0-kb region, and performing extension reactions with DNA polymerase. After extension, the DNA was again melted, and the procedure was repeated for a total of 25 to 30 cycles. After amplification the reaction mixture was transferred to nylon filters and hybridized against radiolabeled 1.0-kb fragment probe DNA. Amplified target DNA was detectable in samples initially containing as little as 0.3 pg of target. The addition of 20 micrograms of nonspecific DNA isolated from sediment samples did not hinder amplification or detection of the target DNA. The detection of 0.3 pg of target DNA was at least a 10(3)-fold increase in the sensitivity of detecting gene sequences compared with dot-blot analysis of nonamplified samples. PCR performed after bacterial DNA was isolated from sediment samples permitted the detection of as few as 100 cells of P. cepacia AC1100 per 100 g of sediment sample against a background of 10(11) diverse nontarget organisms; that is, P. cepacia AC1100 was positively detected at a concentration of 1 cell per g of sediment. This represented a 10(3)-fold increase in sensitivity compared with nonamplified samples.

DNA amplification to enhance detection of genetically engineered bacteria in environmental samples.

Sensitive methods for detecting coliform bacteria, and pathogenic bacteria (Salmonella and Shiqella) in environmental waters that do not require culturing of bacteria were developed by using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) and gene probes. Cells were collected by filtration and DNA was released by freeze-thaw cycling. PCR amplification of region of lacZ gene was used as a target for detection of total coliform bacteria. A region of the lamB gene was the target for detection of Escherichia coli, Salmonella and Shigella. A region of the uid gene was used for detection of E. coli and Shigella. Biotin was incorporated during PCR amplification and the biotinylated DNA was detected by using membrane-bound poly-T-tailed capture probes. As little as 1 fg of total DNA and as few as 1 cell per 100 ml were detectable by the PCR-gene probe method.

R J Steffan

Papers

Recovery of DNA from soils and sediments.

Detection of coliform bacteria in water by polymerase chain reaction and gene probes.

DNA amplification to enhance detection of genetically engineered bacteria in environmental samples.

Detection of Indicator Bacteria and Pathogens in Water by Polym Erase Chain Reaction (PCR) and Gene Probe Methods