https://genoplivning.dk/wp-content/uploads/2013/07/european-resuscitation-council-guidelines-for-resuscitation-2010-section-4-adult-advanced-life-support.pdf

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 4 Adult advanced life support

https://anestesiar.org/WP/uploads/2011/01/7-neonatos-ERC-2010.pdf

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2010 Section 1. Executive summary.

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015

European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 3. Adult advanced life support.

The International Liaison Committee on Resuscitation (ILCOR) was founded on November 22, 1992, and currently includes representatives from the American Heart Association (AHA), the European Resuscitation Council (ERC), the Heart and Stroke Foundation of Canada (HSFC), the Australian and New Zealand Committee on Resuscitation (ANZCOR), Resuscitation Council of Southern Africa (RCSA), the InterAmerican Heart Foundation (IAHF), and the Resuscitation Council of Asia (RCA). Its mission is to identify and review international science and knowledge relevant to cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and emergency cardiovascular care (ECC) and when there is consensus to offer treatment recommendations. Emergency cardiovascular care includes all responses necessary to treat sudden life-threatening events affecting the cardiovascular and respiratory systems, with a particular focus on sudden cardiac arrest.

In 1999, the AHA hosted the first ILCOR conference to evaluate resuscitation science and develop common resuscitation guidelines. The conference recommendations were published in the International Guidelines 2000 for Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care .1 Since 2000, researchers from the ILCOR member councils have evaluated resuscitation science in 5-year cycles. The conclusions and recommendations of the 2005 International Consensus Conference on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations were published at the end of 2005.2,3 The most recent International Consensus Conference was held in Dallas in February 2010, and this publication contains the consensus science statements and treatment recommendations developed with input from the invited participants.

The goal of every resuscitation organization and resuscitation expert is to prevent premature cardiovascular death. When cardiac arrest or life-threatening emergencies occur, prompt and skillful response can make the difference between life and death and between intact survival and debilitation. This document summarizes the 2010 evidence evaluation of published science about the recognition and response to sudden life-threatening events, particularly sudden cardiac arrest and periarrest events in …

/pdf/part-1-executive-summary-2010-international-consensus-on-xfjkhp0zxr.pdf

Part 1: Executive summary: 2010 International Consensus on Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation and Emergency Cardiovascular Care Science With Treatment Recommendations.

Background Several physiological scoring systems (PSS) have been proposed for identifying those at risk of deterioration. However, the chosen specific physiological values chosen and the scores allocated have not been prospectively validated. In this study, we investigate the relative contributions of the ventilatory frequency, heart rate, arterial pressure, temperature, oxygen saturation, and conscious level to mortality in order to devise a robust scoring system. All data were collected on admission to the emergency unit. Precise ‘intervention-calling scores’ could then be derived to trigger interventions. Methods Our observational, population-based single-centred study took place in a 602-bedded district general hospital. Patients admitted to the emergency care unit at Worthing general hospital during an initial study period between July and November 2003 (n = 3184) and a further validation period between October and November 2005 (n = 1102) were included. Results Multivariate logistic regression analysis demonstrated that a ventilatory frequency ≥20 min−1, heart rate ≥102 min−1, systolic blood pressure ≤99 mm Hg, temperature Conclusions A simple validated scoring system to predict mortality in medical patients with precise ‘intervention-calling scores’ has been developed.

Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of a physiological early-warning system for medical admissions. An observational, population-based single-centre study† ‡

Background The Worthing physiological scoring system (PSS) was first validated in 2005 as a tool to predict hospital mortality on admission and was subsequently introduced into clinical practice at Worthing Hospital, UK. Five years on, this study was conducted to determine the effects on mortality and length of stay (LOS) after the introduction of electronic alerting software using the PSS. In addition, we investigated whether the Worthing PSS predictive ability could be improved by addition of further variables. Methods Prospective observational study conducted in the acute medical unit, Worthing Hospital, UK. Patient physiological data on admission and discharge/transfer were collected between February and July 2010 from the electronic alerting software VitalPAC™. Patient characteristics, co-morbidity, outcomes, and biochemistry data were taken from the hospital administration and pathology systems. Results The observed mortality reduction from 8.3% to 5.2% over 5 yr was not statistically significant after adjustment for admission Worthing PSS score. Median LOS was reduced from 4 to 2 days, but this reflected an increase in short stay admissions. Worthing PSS was not significantly improved with the addition of biochemical variables or patient co-morbidity. A score taken before admission to a medical ward showed an improved predictive ability when compared with the initial admission score, but further analysis found no additional clinical benefit. Conclusions The introduction of an electronic alerting PSS did not lead to a reduction in mortality when adjusted for severity of illness defined by physiological variables. Predictive performance was not enhanced by the addition of biochemical variables and co-morbidities.

R.W. Duckitt

Papers

Worthing physiological scoring system: derivation and validation of a physiological early-warning system for medical admissions. An observational, population-based single-centre study† ‡

Introduction of an electronic physiological early warning system: effects on mortality and length of stay