scispace - formally typeset
R

Raghu Kacker

Researcher at National Institute of Standards and Technology

Publications -  14
Citations -  300

Raghu Kacker is an academic researcher from National Institute of Standards and Technology. The author has contributed to research in topics: Debugging & Test strategy. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 14 publications receiving 269 citations.

Papers
More filters
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Identifying Failure-Inducing Combinations in a Combinatorial Test Set

TL;DR: This paper presents an approach to identifying failure-inducing combinations, i.e., combinations that have caused some tests to fail, and shows that this approach can effectively and efficiently identify failure- inducing combinations in benchmark programs.
Journal ArticleDOI

A Combinatorial Testing-Based Approach to Fault Localization

TL;DR: A fault localization approach, called BEN, which produces a ranking of statements in terms of their likelihood of being faulty by leveraging the result of combinatorial testing.
Journal ArticleDOI

Finding Bugs in Cryptographic Hash Function Implementations

TL;DR: This work revisits the National Institute of Standards and Technology hash function competition, which was used to develop the SHA-3 standard, and applies a new testing strategy to all available reference implementations, and develops four tests motivated by the cryptographic properties that a hash function should satisfy.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Applying Combinatorial Testing to the Siemens Suite

TL;DR: The experimental results show that combinatorial testing is effective in terms of detecting most of the faulty versions with a small number of tests, and the details of the modeling process are reported, which hope to shed some lights on this critical, yet often ignored step, in the combinatorially testing process.
Proceedings ArticleDOI

Fault localization based on failure-inducing combinations

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present an approach to fault localization that leverages the result of combinatorial testing based on a notion called failure-inducing combinations, where a combination is failureinducing if it causes any test in which it appears to fail.