scispace - formally typeset
R

Ranoua Bouchouicha

Researcher at University of Reading

Publications -  9
Citations -  356

Ranoua Bouchouicha is an academic researcher from University of Reading. The author has contributed to research in topics: Prospect theory & Capitalization rate. The author has an hindex of 6, co-authored 9 publications receiving 287 citations. Previous affiliations of Ranoua Bouchouicha include Centre national de la recherche scientifique & University of Lyon.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Common components of risk and uncertainty attitudes across contexts and domains: evidence from 30 countries

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present data collected in controlled experiments with 2,939 subjects in 30 countries measuring risk and uncertainty attitudes through incentivized measures as well as survey questions, and show that measures correlate not only within decision contexts or measurement methods, but also across contexts and methods.
Journal ArticleDOI

Real estate markets and the macroeconomy: A dynamic coherence framework

TL;DR: In this paper, a new approach based on a dynamic coherence function (DCF) was applied to study the interactions bringing together different real estate markets (the securitized market, the commercial market and the residential market).
Journal ArticleDOI

Accommodating stake effects under prospect theory

TL;DR: In this article, a one-parameter logarithmic utility function was used to fit the stake effects significantly better under prospect theory than the power or exponential functions mostly used when fitting prospect theory models.
Journal ArticleDOI

Growth, entrepreneurship, and risk-tolerance: a risk-income paradox

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors find a negative between-country correlation between risk-tolerance and GDP per capita, together with a positive within-country correlated between risk tolerance and income, which results in a risk-income paradox.
Journal ArticleDOI

Gender effects for loss aversion: Yes, no, maybe?

TL;DR: This paper found that women are more risk averse than men according to one definition, while another definition results in no gender differences, and the remaining two definitions point to women being less risk-aware than men.