scispace - formally typeset
R

Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther

Researcher at University of California, Santa Cruz

Publications -  41
Citations -  1095

Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther is an academic researcher from University of California, Santa Cruz. The author has contributed to research in topics: Philosophy of biology & Philosophy of science. The author has an hindex of 19, co-authored 38 publications receiving 1020 citations. Previous affiliations of Rasmus Grønfeldt Winther include University of Copenhagen & National Autonomous University of Mexico.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Varieties of modules: kinds, levels, origins, and behaviors.

TL;DR: This article began as a review of a conference, organized by Gerhard Schlosser, entitled "Modularity in Development and Evolution," but subsequently metamorphosed into a literature and concept review as well as an analysis of the differences in current perspectives on modularity.
Journal ArticleDOI

Darwin on Variation and Heredity

TL;DR: An analysis of Darwin’s elaboration and modification of these two positions from his early notebooks to the last edition of the Variation of Animals and Plants Under Domestication complements previous Darwin scholarship on these issues.
Journal ArticleDOI

Alternative definitions of epistasis: dependence and interaction

TL;DR: It is shown how independence of gene action can be different from the absence of gene interaction, and how the two formulations converge with weak selection but not with strong selection or, for multiple loci, when the aggregated interaction terms are not negligible.
Journal ArticleDOI

August Weismann on germ-plasm variation.

TL;DR: An analysis of his work indicates that Weismann always held that changes in external conditions, acting during development, were the necessary causes of variation in the hereditary material, and divides his career into four stages.
Journal ArticleDOI

Parts and theories in compositional biology

TL;DR: A discussion of the importance of recognizing formal and compositional biology as two genuinely different ways of doing biology – the differences arising more from their distinct methodologies than from scientific discipline included or natural domain studied.