Generalized Linear Models (2nd ed.)

Overuse tendinopathy is problematic to manage clinically. People of different ages with tendons under diverse loads present with varying degrees of pain, irritability, and capacity to function. Recovery is similarly variable; some tendons recover with simple interventions, some remain resistant to all treatments. The pathology of tendinopathy has been described as degenerative or failed healing. Neither of these descriptions fully explains the heterogeneity of presentation. This review proposes, and provides evidence for, a continuum of pathology. This model of pathology allows rational placement of treatments along the continuum. A new model of tendinopathy and thoughtful treatment implementation may improve outcomes for those with tendinopathy. This model is presented for evaluation by clinicians and researchers.

https://bjsm.bmj.com/content/bjsports/43/6/409.full.pdf

Is tendon pathology a continuum? A pathology model to explain the clinical presentation of load-induced tendinopathy

Tendinopathy is a broad term encompassing painful conditions occurring in and around tendons in response to overuse. Recent basic science research suggests little or no inflammation is present in these conditions. Thus, traditional treatment modalities aimed at controlling inflammation such as corticosteroid injections and nonsteroidal antiinflammatory medications (NSAIDS) may not be the most effective options. We performed a systematic review of the literature to determine the best treatment options for tendinopathy. We evaluated the effectiveness of NSAIDS, corticosteroid injections, exercise-based physical therapy, physical therapy modalities, shock wave therapy, sclerotherapy, nitric oxide patches, surgery, growth factors, and stem cell treatment. NSAIDS and corticosteroids appear to provide pain relief in the short term, but their effectiveness in the long term has not been demonstrated. We identified inconsistent results with shock wave therapy and physical therapy modalities such as ultrasound, iontophoresis and low-level laser therapy. Current data support the use of eccentric strengthening protocols, sclerotherapy, and nitric oxide patches, but larger, multicenter trials are needed to confirm the early results with these treatments. Preliminary work with growth factors and stem cells is promising, but further study is required in these fields. Surgery remains the last option due to the morbidity and inconsistent outcomes. The ideal treatment for tendinopathy remains unclear. Level of Evidence: Level II, systematic review. See the Guidelines for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

/pdf/treatment-of-tendinopathy-what-works-what-does-not-and-what-qjygrkz8kh.pdf

Treatment of tendinopathy: what works, what does not, and what is on the horizon.

BackgroundFew randomized controlled trials compare different methods of management in chronic tendinopathy of the main body of tendo Achillis.PurposeTo compare the effectiveness of 3 management strategies—group 1, eccentric loading; group 2, repetitive low-energy shock-wave therapy (SWT); and group 3, wait and see—in patients with chronic tendinopathy of the main body of tendo Achillis.Study DesignRandomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1.MethodsSeventy-five patients with a chronic recalcitrant (>6 months) noninsertional Achilles tendinopathy were enrolled in a randomized controlled study. All patients had received unsuccessful management for >3 months, including at least (1) peritendinous local injections, (2) nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and (3) physiotherapy. A computerized random-number generator was used to draw up an allocation schedule. Analysis was on intention-to-treat basis.ResultsAt 4 months from baseline, the Victorian Institute of Sport Assessment (VISA)-A score increased in ...

/pdf/eccentric-loading-shock-wave-treatment-or-a-wait-and-see-1086qh19tu.pdf

Eccentric Loading, Shock-Wave Treatment, or a Wait-and-See Policy for Tendinopathy of the Main Body of Tendo Achillis A Randomized Controlled Trial

Overuse disorders of tendons, or tendinopathies, present a challenge to sports physicians, surgeons, and other health care professionals dealing with athletes. The Achilles, patellar, and supraspinatus tendons are particularly vulnerable to injury and often difficult to manage successfully. Inflammation was believed central to the pathologic process, but histopathologic evidence has confirmed the failed healing response nature of these conditions. Excessive or inappropriate loading of the musculotendinous unit is believed to be central to the disease process, although the exact mechanism by which this occurs remains uncertain. Additionally, the location of the lesion (for example, the midtendon or osteotendinous junction) has become increasingly recognized as influencing both the pathologic process and subsequent management. The mechanical, vascular, neural, and other theories that seek to explain the pathologic process are explored in this article. Recent developments in the nonoperative management of chronic tendon disorders are reviewed, as is the rationale for surgical intervention. Recent surgical advances, including minimally invasive tendon surgery, are reviewed. Potential future management strategies, such as stem cell therapy, growth factor treatment, and gene transfer, are also discussed.

Management of Tendinopathy

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility, and predictive value of palpation of the painful arc sign and of the Royal London Hospital test in 10 patients with Achilles tendinopathy and in 14 asymptomatic subjects. DESIGN: Test-retest study. SETTING: University teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Ten male athletes on the waiting list for exploration of one of their Achilles tendons for tendinopathy of the main body of the tendon attended a special clinic. Each was invited to bring at least one athlete of the same sex in the same discipline aged within 2 years of themselves with no history and no symptoms of Achilles tendinopathy. A total of 14 controls were thus recruited. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Pain and tenderness following performance of palpation, the painful arc sign, and the Royal London Hospital test. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences at the 5% level among the effects of investigator or between morning and afternoon measurements for any of the three measurement methods. There was no evidence of a difference of the three assessment methods (p > 0.05). When the three methods were combined, the overall sensitivity was 0.586 (confidence interval [CI], 0.469-0.741), and the overall specificity was 0.833 (CI, 0.758-0.889). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon with a tender area of intratendinous swelling that moves with the tendon and whose tenderness significantly decreases or disappears when the tendon is put under tension, a clinical diagnosis of tendinopathy can be formulated, with a high positive predictive chance that the tendon will show ultrasonographic and histologic features of tendinopathy.

Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy with tendinosis.

Objective To report the outcome of surgery for chronic recalcitrant Achilles tendinopathy in nonathletic and athletic subjects. Design Case-control study. Setting University teaching hospitals. Patients We matched each of the 61 nonathletic patients with a diagnosis of tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon with an athletic patient with tendinopathy of the main body of the Achilles tendon of the same sex and age (±2 years). A match was possible for 56 patients (23 males and 33 females). Forty-eight nonathletic subjects and 45 athletic subjects agreed to participate. Interventions Open surgery for Achilles tendinopathy. Main Outcome Measure Outcome of surgery, return to sport, complication rate. Results Nonathletic patients were shorter and heavier than athletic patients. They had greater body mass index, calf circumference, side-to-side calf circumference differences, and subcutaneous body fat than athletic patients. Of the 48 nonathletic patients, 9 underwent further surgery during the study period, and only 25 reported an excellent or good result. Of the 45 athletic subjects, 4 underwent further surgery during the study period, and 36 reported an excellent or good result. The remaining patients could not return to their normal levels of activity. In all of them, pain significantly interfered with daily activities. Conclusions Nonathletic subjects experience more prolonged recovery, more complications, and a greater risk of further surgery than athletic subjects with recalcitrant Achilles tendinopathy.

Surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy yields worse results in nonathletic patients.

We evaluated sensitivity, specificity, reproducibility and predictive value of palpation, of the painful arc sign, and of the ‘Royal London Hospital test’ in 10 patients with Achilles tendinopathy, and in 14 asymptomatic subjects using a test-retest study design. Ten male athletes on the waiting list for exploration of one of their Achilles tendons for tendinopathy of the main body of the tenon attended a special clinic. Each was invited to bring at least one athlete of the same sex in the same discipline aged within two years of themselves, with no history and no symptoms of AT. A total of 14 controls were thus recruited. Pain and tenderness following performance of palpation, the painful arc sign, and the ‘Royal London Hospital test’ were recorded. There were no statistically significant differences at the 5% level among the effects of investigator or between morning and afternoon measurements for any of the three assessment methods. There was no evidence of a difference of the three assessment methods (p> 0.05). When the three methods were combined, the overall sensitivity was 0.586 (CI 0.469 – 0.741) and the overall specificity was 0.833 (CI 0.758 – 0.889). In patients with tendinopathy of the Achilles tendon with a tender area of intratendinous swelling which moves with the tendon and whose tenderness significantly decreases or disappears when the tendon is put under tension, a clinical diagnosis of tendinopathy can be formulated, with a high positive predictive chance that the tendon will show ultrasonographic and histological features of tendinopathy.

Renato Regine

Papers

Clinical diagnosis of Achilles tendinopathy with tendinosis.

Surgery for chronic Achilles tendinopathy yields worse results in nonathletic patients.

The clinical diagnosis of achilles tendinopathy