BACKGROUND: Somatoform disorders are characterised by chronic, medically unexplained physical symptoms (MUPS). Although different medications are part of treatment routines for people with somatoform disorders in clinics and private practices, there exists no systematic review or meta-analysis on the efficacy and tolerability of these medications. We aimed to synthesise to improve optimal treatment decisions.OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders (specifically somatisation disorder, undifferentiated somatoform disorder, somatoform autonomic dysfunction, and pain disorder) in adults.SEARCH METHODS: We searched the Cochrane Depression, Anxiety and Neurosis Review Group's Specialised Register (CCDANCTR) (to 17 January 2014). This register includes relevant randomised controlled trials (RCTs) from The Cochrane Library (all years), MEDLINE (1950 to date), EMBASE (1974 to date), and PsycINFO (1967 to date). To identify ongoing trials, we searched ClinicalTrials.gov, Current Controlled Trials metaRegister, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform, and the Chinese Clinical Trials Registry. For grey literature, we searched ProQuest Dissertation {\&} Theses Database, OpenGrey, and BIOSIS Previews. We handsearched conference proceedings and reference lists of potentially relevant papers and systematic reviews and contacted experts in the field.SELECTION CRITERIA: We selected RCTs or cluster RCTs of pharmacological interventions versus placebo, treatment as usual, another medication, or a combination of different medications for somatoform disorders in adults. We included people fulfilling standardised diagnostic criteria for somatisation disorder, undifferentiated somatoform disorder, somatoform autonomic dysfunction, or somatoform pain disorder.DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author and one research assistant independently extracted data and assessed risk of bias. Primary outcomes included the severity of MUPS on a continuous measure, and acceptability of treatment.MAIN RESULTS: We included 26 RCTs (33 reports), with 2159 participants, in the review. They examined the efficacy of different types of antidepressants, the combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic, antipsychotics alone, or natural products (NPs). The duration of the studies ranged between two and 12 weeks.One meta-analysis of placebo-controlled studies showed no clear evidence of a significant difference between tricyclic antidepressants (TCAs) and placebo for the outcome severity of MUPS (SMD -0.13; 95{\%} CI -0.39 to 0.13; 2 studies, 239 participants; I(2) = 2{\%}; low-quality evidence). For new-generation antidepressants (NGAs), there was very low-quality evidence showing they were effective in reducing the severity of MUPS (SMD -0.91; 95{\%} CI -1.36 to -0.46; 3 studies, 243 participants; I(2) = 63{\%}). For NPs there was low-quality evidence that they were effective in reducing the severity of MUPS (SMD -0.74; 95{\%} CI -0.97 to -0.51; 2 studies, 322 participants; I(2) = 0{\%}).One meta-analysis showed no clear evidence of a difference between TCAs and NGAs for severity of MUPS (SMD -0.16; 95{\%} CI -0.55 to 0.23; 3 studies, 177 participants; I(2) = 42{\%}; low-quality evidence). There was also no difference between NGAs and other NGAs for severity of MUPS (SMD -0.16; 95{\%} CI -0.45 to 0.14; 4 studies, 182 participants; I(2) = 0{\%}).Finally, one meta-analysis comparing selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors (SSRIs) with a combination of SSRIs and antipsychotics showed low-quality evidence in favour of combined treatment for severity of MUPS (SMD 0.77; 95{\%} CI 0.32 to 1.22; 2 studies, 107 participants; I(2) = 23{\%}).Differences regarding the acceptability of the treatment (rate of all-cause drop-outs) were neither found between NGAs and placebo (RR 1.01, 95{\%} CI 0.64 to 1.61; 2 studies, 163 participants; I(2) = 0{\%}; low-quality evidence) or NPs and placebo (RR 0.85, 95{\%} CI 0.40 to 1.78; 3 studies, 506 participants; I(2) = 0{\%}; low-quality evidence); nor between TCAs and other medication (RR 1.48, 95{\%} CI 0.59 to 3.72; 8 studies, 556 participants; I(2) =14{\%}; low-quality evidence); nor between antidepressants and the combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic (RR 0.80, 95{\%} CI 0.25 to 2.52; 2 studies, 118 participants; I(2) = 0{\%}; low-quality evidence). Percental attrition rates due to adverse effects were high in all antidepressant treatments (0{\%} to 32{\%}), but low for NPs (0{\%} to 1.7{\%}).The risk of bias was high in many domains across studies. Seventeen trials (65.4{\%}) gave no information about random sequence generation and only two (7.7{\%}) provided information about allocation concealment. Eighteen studies (69.2{\%}) revealed a high or unclear risk in blinding participants and study personnel; 23 studies had high risk of bias relating to blinding assessors. For the comparison NGA versus placebo, there was relatively high imprecision and heterogeneity due to one outlier study. Although we identified 26 studies, each comparison only contained a few studies and small numbers of participants so the results were imprecise.AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: The current review found very low-quality evidence for NGAs and low-quality evidence for NPs being effective in treating somatoform symptoms in adults when compared with placebo. There was some evidence that different classes of antidepressants did not differ in efficacy; however, this was limited and of low to very low quality. These results had serious shortcomings such as the high risk of bias, strong heterogeneity in the data, and small sample sizes. Furthermore, the significant effects of antidepressant treatment have to be balanced against the relatively high rates of adverse effects. Adverse effects produced by medication can have amplifying effects on symptom perceptions, particularly in people focusing on somatic symptoms without medical causes. We can only draw conclusions about short-term efficacy of the pharmacological interventions because no trial included follow-up assessments. For each of the comparisons where there were available data on acceptability rates (NGAs versus placebo, NPs versus placebo, TCAs versus other medication, and antidepressants versus a combination of an antidepressant and an antipsychotic), no clear differences between the intervention and comparator were found.Future high-quality research should be carried out to determine the effectiveness of medications other than antidepressants, to compare antidepressants more thoroughly, and to follow-up participants over longer periods (the longest follow up was just 12 weeks). Another idea for future research would be to include other outcomes such as functional impairment or dysfunctional behaviours and cognitions as well as the classical outcomes such as symptom severity, depression, or anxiety.

Pharmacological interventions for somatoform disorders in adults.

ContextIntravenous tissue-type plasminogen activator can be beneficial to some
patients when given within 3 hours of stroke onset, but many patients present
later after stroke onset and alternative treatments are needed.ObjectiveTo determine the clinical efficacy and safety of intra-arterial (IA)
recombinant prourokinase (r-proUK) in patients with acute stroke of less than
6 hours' duration caused by middle cerebral artery (MCA) occlusion.DesignPROACT II (Prolyse in Acute Cerebral Thromboembolism II), a randomized,
controlled, multicenter, open-label clinical trial with blinded follow-up
conducted between February 1996 and August 1998.SettingFifty-four centers in the United States and Canada.PatientsA total of 180 patients with acute ischemic stroke of less than 6 hours'
duration caused by angiographically proven occlusion of the MCA and without
hemorrhage or major early infarction signs on computed tomographic scan.InterventionPatients were randomized to receive 9 mg of IA r-proUK plus heparin
(n = 121) or heparin only (n = 59).Main Outcome MeasuresThe primary outcome, analyzed by intention-to-treat, was based on the
proportion of patients with slight or no neurological disability at 90 days
as defined by a modified Rankin score of 2 or less. Secondary outcomes included
MCA recanalization, the frequency of intracranial hemorrhage with neurological
deterioration, and mortality.ResultsFor the primary analysis, 40% of r-proUK patients and 25% of control
patients had a modified Rankin score of 2 or less (P
= .04). Mortality was 25% for the r-proUK group and 27% for the control group.
The recanalization rate was 66% for the r-proUK group and 18% for the control
group (P<.001). Intracranial hemorrhage with neurological
deterioration within 24 hours occurred in 10% of r-proUK patients and 2% of
control patients (P = .06).ConclusionDespite an increased frequency of early symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage,
treatment with IA r-proUK within 6 hours of the onset of acute ischemic stroke
caused by MCA occlusion significantly improved clinical outcome at 90 days.

https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/articlepdf/192156/JOC91323.pdf

Intra-arterial Prourokinase for Acute Ischemic Stroke: The PROACT II Study: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Irritable bowel syndrome

Background Questions remain about the strength and shape of the dose-response relationship between fruit and vegetable intake and risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and mortality, and the effects of specific types of fruit and vegetables. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to clarify these associations. Methods PubMed and Embase were searched up to 29 September 2016. Prospective studies of fruit and vegetable intake and cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality were included. Summary relative risks (RRs) were calculated using a random effects model, and the mortality burden globally was estimated; 95 studies (142 publications) were included. Results For fruits and vegetables combined, the summary RR per 200 g/day was 0.92 [95% confidence interval (CI): 0.90-0.94, I 2 = 0%, n = 15] for coronary heart disease, 0.84 (95% CI: 0.76-0.92, I 2 = 73%, n = 10) for stroke, 0.92 (95% CI: 0.90-0.95, I 2 = 31%, n = 13) for cardiovascular disease, 0.97 (95% CI: 0.95-0.99, I 2 = 49%, n = 12) for total cancer and 0.90 (95% CI: 0.87-0.93, I 2 = 83%, n = 15) for all-cause mortality. Similar associations were observed for fruits and vegetables separately. Reductions in risk were observed up to 800 g/day for all outcomes except cancer (600 g/day). Inverse associations were observed between the intake of apples and pears, citrus fruits, green leafy vegetables, cruciferous vegetables, and salads and cardiovascular disease and all-cause mortality, and between the intake of green-yellow vegetables and cruciferous vegetables and total cancer risk. An estimated 5.6 and 7.8 million premature deaths worldwide in 2013 may be attributable to a fruit and vegetable intake below 500 and 800 g/day, respectively, if the observed associations are causal. Conclusions Fruit and vegetable intakes were associated with reduced risk of cardiovascular disease, cancer and all-cause mortality. These results support public health recommendations to increase fruit and vegetable intake for the prevention of cardiovascular disease, cancer, and premature mortality.

/pdf/fruit-and-vegetable-intake-and-the-risk-of-cardiovascular-2kgei6flny.pdf

Fruit and vegetable intake and the risk of cardiovascular disease, total cancer and all-cause mortality-a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis of prospective studies.

The Serotonin Signaling System: From Basic Understanding To Drug Development for Functional GI Disorders

Dietary fiber intake provides many health benefits. However, average fiber intakes for US children and adults are less than half of the recommended levels. Individuals with high intakes of dietary fiber appear to be at significantly lower risk for developing coronary heart disease, stroke, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and certain gastrointestinal diseases. Increasing fiber intake lowers blood pressure and serum cholesterol levels. Increased intake of soluble fiber improves glycemia and insulin sensitivity in non-diabetic and diabetic individuals. Fiber supplementation in obese individuals significantly enhances weight loss. Increased fiber intake benefits a number of gastrointestinal disorders including the following: gastroesophageal reflux disease, duodenal ulcer, diverticulitis, constipation, and hemorrhoids. Prebiotic fibers appear to enhance immune function. Dietary fiber intake provides similar benefits for children as for adults. The recommended dietary fiber intakes for children and adults are 14 g/1000 kcal. More effective communication and consumer education is required to enhance fiber consumption from foods or supplements.

/pdf/health-benefits-of-dietary-fiber-zz0kbfsfg5.pdf

Health benefits of dietary fiber

https://www.gastrojournal.org/article/S0016-5085(85)80140-2/pdf

Nausea, Vomiting, and Abdominal Pain After Roux-en-Y Anastomosis: Motility of the Jejunal Limb

The effects of domperidone, a peripherally acting dopamine antagonist, were compared with those of placebo in a double-blind randomized study in 16 patients with idiopathic gastric stasis, chronic symptoms of “nonulcer dyspepsia” (including nausea, vomiting, and abdominal pain), and altered gastroduodenal motility. Patients received either domperidone or placebo orally (20 mg before meals and at bedtime) for six weeks. Symptoms were assessed by daily diaries kept by the patients for two weeks while receiving no medication for their gastrointestinal complaints (baseline), and throughout the six-week treatment phase. Studies of gastric emptying of a radiolabeled solid-phase meal were performed at baseline and six weeks after treatment. All patients had delayed gastric emptying at baseline, defined as a half-emptying time of more than mean +1 sd (from studies of normal controls). An 18- to 24-hr recording of gastroduodenal motor function during fasting was also performed at baseline and after six weeks of either domperidone or placebo treatment. After six weeks of treatment, the symptom scores significantly improved in the domperidone group (P<0.05), but not in the placebo group. Gastroduodenal motor activity was unchanged from baseline recordings after six weeks. Solid-phase gastric emptying also showed no improvement in either the domperidone or placebo group of patients. Although domperidone therapy had no significant effect on motility, it appears to be an effective drug for the treatment of the symptoms of nonulcer dyspepsia.

Richard H. Davis

Papers

Health benefits of dietary fiber

Nausea, Vomiting, and Abdominal Pain After Roux-en-Y Anastomosis: Motility of the Jejunal Limb

Effects of domperidone in patients with chronic unexplained upper gastrointestinal symptoms: a double-blind, placebo-controlled study.

Treatment of chronic constipation with colchicine: randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, crossover trial.

Abnormal gastroduodenal motility in children and adolescents with recurrent functional abdominal pain