BackgroundThe best choice of graft tissue for use in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction has been the subject of debate. Hypothesis: Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon autograft leads to greater knee stability than reconstruction with hamstring tendon autograft.Study DesignMetaanalysis.MethodsA Medline search identified articles published from January 1966 to May 2000 describing arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with either patellar tendon or hamstring tendon autograft and with a minimum patient follow-up of 24 months.ResultsThere were 1348 patients in the patellar tendon group (21 studies) and 628 patients in the hamstring tendon group (13 studies). The rate of graft failure in the patellar tendon group was significantly lower (1.9% versus 4.9%) and a significantly higher proportion of patients in the patellar tendon group had a side-to-side difference of less than 3 mm on KT-1000 arthrometer testing than in the hamstring tendon group (79% versus 73....

/pdf/arthroscopic-anterior-cruciate-ligament-reconstruction-a-3kl3y3x372.pdf

Arthroscopic Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Metaanalysis Comparing Patellar Tendon and Hamstring Tendon Autografts

A prospective randomized study was performed to determine the differences in results between three methods of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: autogenous bone-patellar tendon-bone graft (group 1), semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft reconstruction combined with an extraarticular procedure (group 2), and semitendinosus and gracilis tendon graft reconstruction alone (group 3). Preoperatively, there were no significant differences between groups. At a mean of 35.4±11.6 months postoperatively, 102 patients returned for evaluation. International Knee Documentation Committee knee evaluation revealed no significant differences in symptoms, function, return to pre-injury activity, harvest site abnormalities, or limitation of motion between groups 1 and 3. Patients in group 2 had a higher incidence of patellofemoral crepitation and loss of motion than did patients in group 3. The mean manual maximum KT-1000 arthrometer side-to-side difference was 2.1±2.0 mm in group 1, which was statistically signif...

Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction A Prospective Randomized Study of Three Surgical Methods

Very few subjects in contemporary orthopaedic surgery have evoked as much controversy, thought, and opinion as that of when and how to optimally reconstruct the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee. Fueled by an annual incidence of acute rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament that has been estimated to be one in 3000 in the American population—approximately 95,000 new injuries each year196—and combined with the fact that more than 50,000 knees that have such an injury are reconstructed annually in the United States alone149, it is not surprising that there has been a virtual explosion of literature on this topic. During the last twenty years, more than 2000 scientific articles on the anterior cruciate ligament have been published, including numerous excellent reviews47,149,151,255,282,294 and textbooks72,89,145. It is a challenging task to attempt to synthesize these sources and to try to resolve the conflicts that are inherent in such a massive body of information. Although many relevant issues will continue to be debated until better basic-science and clinical information becomes available, a number of scientifically supported concepts can be identified within the existing knowledge base. This knowledge can help orthopaedic surgeons to understand the reasons for previous and current successes and failures of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament, and it can help them to plan the care of patients who have an injury of the ligament.

In the present review, the current scientific understanding of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament is discussed in a sequence based on the order in which clinical decisions are made. An overview of the normal function of the knee joint and the anterior cruciate ligament is followed by a discussion of decisions that must …

The science of reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament.

In situ forces in the anterior cruciate ligament and its bundles in response to anterior tibial loads

We compared the outcome of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendon autograft with outcome using patellar tendon autograft at 2 years after surgery. Patients had an isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury and, apart from the grafts, the arthroscopic surgical technique was identical. Prospective assessment was performed on 90 patients with isolated anterior cruciate ligament injury undergoing reconstruction with a patellar tendon autograft; 82 were available for follow-up. The hamstring tendon autograft group consisted of the next 90 consecutive patients fulfilling the same criteria; 85 were available for follow-up. Clinical review included the Lysholm and International Knee Documentation Committee scores, instrumented testing, thigh atrophy, and kneeling pain. These methods revealed no difference between the groups in terms of ligament stability, range of motion, and general symptoms. Thigh atrophy was significantly less in the hamstring tendon group at 1 year after surgery, a difference that had disappeared by 2 years. The KT-1000 arthrometer testing showed a slightly increased mean laxity in the female patients in the hamstring tendon graft group. Kneeling pain after reconstruction with the hamstring tendon autograft was significantly less common than with the patellar tendon autograft, suggesting lower donor-site morbidity with hamstring tendon harvest.

Arthroscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A comparison of patellar tendon autograft and four-strand hamstring tendon autograft.

The results of the first sixty-nine consecutive patients who had had seventy arthroscopically assisted reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of an autogenous patellar-ligament graft at our institution were reviewed retrospectively. Sixty-seven patients (sixty-eight knees) were available for evaluation after a minimum of two years. All patients had been managed with early, postoperative range-of-motion exercises and a standardized program of physical therapy. At the time of the most recent follow-up evaluation, the median ligament score, according to the rating system of The Hospital for Special Surgery, was 93 of a possible 100 points. Of the sixty-eight knees, forty-four were rated excellent; fifteen, good; six, fair; and three, poor. Eighteen knees had symptoms related to the patellofemoral joint and sixty-three had a full range of motion; two knees had had manipulation for loss of flexion. At the follow-up evaluation, KT-1000 arthrometric measurements were obtained for both knees of fifty-six patients. Eighty-four per cent of the patients had an increase of three millimeters or less in anterior-posterior displacement of the tibia on the reconstructed side compared with the normal side, while 93 per cent had an increase of four millimeters or less. Postoperatively, there was no apparent association between changes in the Insall-Salvati patellar ligament-to-patella ratios and pain in the patellofemoral joint. The results of the arthroscopically assisted reconstructions combined with use of early range-of-motion exercises were comparable with those reported after open reconstruction and immobilization of the limb in a plaster cast. The frequency of pain in the patellofemoral joint and the need for manipulation because of loss of motion were decreased after the arthroscopically assisted procedures.

Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of autogenous patellar-ligament grafts. Results after twenty-four to forty-two months.

A retrospective study was performed to determine the etiology of failed primary anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction and evaluate the clinical results of revision ACL surgery. From January 1989 to January 1996, 90 patients with failed ACL reconstructions underwent revision ACL surgery. The etiology of failed ACL reconstruction included 47 surgical technical errors, 22 traumatic reinjuries, 7 lack of graft incorporation, 3 loss of motion, 3 related to synthetic grafts, and 8 alignment or combined ligamentous instability patterns not addressed. Of 52 revision ACL patients with minimum 2-year follow-up, 43 responded to a questionnaire and underwent a comprehensive physical examination. The Hospital for Special Surgery knee ligament evaluation revealed 63% good/excellent results. Objective laxity test revealed 77% of all patients had 0/+1 grade on Lachman and a mean 2.86-mm KT 1000. The overall results of revision ACL surgery are encouraging in providing symptomatic relief and restoring stability; however, they are significantly lower than primary ACL surgery.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: etiology of failures and clinical results.

A retrospective review of 72 acute ACL injuries in 70 athletically active patients (50 recreational and 20 com petitive athletes) treated with primary repair and semi tendinosus tendon augmentation was conducted (mean follow-up time, 38.5 months). All patients had open primary multiple loop depth-varying suture repair and semitendinosus tendon augmentation at a mean injury to surgery interval of 9.1 days. Fifty-one cases (70.8%) were supplemented with an extraarticular procedure consisting in all cases of an iliotibial band lateral sling reinforcement. All patients underwent 6 weeks of post operative immobilization followed by a graduated re habilitation regimen lasting a mean 7.2 months. In 22 of the ACL tears, no other associated injury could be defined at arthrotomy, while in 27, significant medial collateral ligament injuries were noted. Lateral meniscal injuries (24) were more commonly noted than medial meniscal injuries (19).Good to excellent subjective results were reported in 82%, while 77.1 % ret...

Primary repair with semitendinosus tendon augmentation of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries

The effect of iliotibial band "lateral sling" augmentation on long-term outcome in ACL reconstruction using free autogenous central-third patellar tendon was evaluated retrospectively. Eighty reconstructions were reviewed; the minimum followup was 2 years and the average was 4 years. Sixty percent of the procedures involved supplementation with a lateral sling. By both clinical evaluation and KT-1000 measurement, there were no differences in the results of patients with lateral sling augmentation and those without it. In addition, 40% of patients had chronic pain and/or swelling related to the lateral sling. We do not currently recommend the routine use of a lateral sling augmentation for ACL reconstruction using central-third patellar tendon.

The iliotibial band lateral sling procedure and its effect on the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

Although the squat exercise is considered essential for optimal athletic performance, controversy exists regarding the effect on knee stability. The purpose of this prospective study was to determine the effect of squat exercises on in vivo knee joint stability of professional football players. Thirty-two subjects with normal knees participated in a 21-week off-season training program. Subjects performed power squat exercises with barbell loads of 130% to 200% body weight twice weekly. Both knees of each subject were tested by a single examiner with a knee ligament arthrometer before the training program and at 12 and 21 weeks. Passive displacements were recorded at 67, 89, and 133 N with the knee at 30 degrees and 90 degrees of flexion. Active testing was performed with the knee in the same positions. Student's paired t-tests were used to compare pre- and postexercise measures. For all subjects, no significant differences were found between pre- and postexercise results for active and passive tests. Of the 2440 measurements taken, only 8 demonstrated increased excursions greater than 2 mm. This study demonstrates no significant increases in anterior-posterior tibiofemoral translation in athletes using the squat exercise as part of their off-season training program.

/pdf/the-effect-of-the-squat-exercise-on-anterior-posterior-knee-3nxv295agb.pdf

Robert A. Panariello

Papers

Arthroscopically assisted reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with use of autogenous patellar-ligament grafts. Results after twenty-four to forty-two months.

Revision anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: etiology of failures and clinical results.

Primary repair with semitendinosus tendon augmentation of acute anterior cruciate ligament injuries

The iliotibial band lateral sling procedure and its effect on the results of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

The effect of the squat exercise on anterior-posterior knee translation in professional football players