Robert E. Wright

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors outline the choice experiment approach to environmental valuation, which has its roots in Lancaster's characteristics theory of value, in random utility theory and in experimental design, and illustrate the use of choice experiments with reference to a recent UK study on public preferences for alternative forest landscapes.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors examine some popular choice modelling approaches to environmental valuation, which can be considered as alternatives to more familiar valuation techniques based on stated preferences such as the contingent valuation method.

TL;DR: In this article, the authors estimate the magnitude of these external costs and benefits for the case of renewable technologies in Scotland, a country which has set particularly ambitious targets for expanding renewable energy.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors compared two direct valuation methods, namely contingent valuation and choice experiments, to value the conservation benefits of Environmentally Sensitive Areas (ESAs) in Scotland.

TL;DR: This paper uses the choice experiment method to estimate the value of improvements in three components of ecological status and test the ability of choice experiments for benefits transfer across two very similar rivers in the UK.