R
Robert J. House
Researcher at University of Pennsylvania
Publications - 89
Citations - 41778
Robert J. House is an academic researcher from University of Pennsylvania. The author has contributed to research in topics: Transformational leadership & Leadership style. The author has an hindex of 53, co-authored 89 publications receiving 39932 citations. Previous affiliations of Robert J. House include University of Toronto & City University of New York.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Role Conflict and Ambiguity in Complex Organizations.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors describe the development and testing of questionnaire measures of role conflict and ambiguity and show that these two constructs are factorially identifiable and independent, and that they tend to correlate with measures of organizational and managerial practices and leader behavior.
Journal ArticleDOI
Culture, leadership, and organizations : the GLOBE study of 62 societies
TL;DR: The GLOBE culture and leadership scales as mentioned in this paper were developed by the Globe Research Program at the University of Southern California (U.S.A. in the early 1990s).
Journal ArticleDOI
The Motivational Effects of Charismatic Leadership: A Self-Concept Based Theory
TL;DR: In this article, a self-concept based motivational theory is proposed to explain the process by which charismatic leader behaviors cause profound transformational effects on followers, and testable propositions about the behavior of charismatic leaders and their effects on the followers are derived.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Path-Goal Theory of Leader Effectiveness
TL;DR: In this article, an explanation of the effects of leader behavior on subordinate satisfaction, motivation, and performance is presented, derived from a path-goal theory of motivation, which specifies some of the situational moderators on which the effect of specific leader behaviors are contingent.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Social Scientific Study of Leadership: Quo Vadis?
Robert J. House,Ram N. Aditya +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors review the history of the social scientific study of leadership and the prevailing theories of leadership that enjoy empirical support and identify the contributions of the trait, behavioral, contingency and neocharismatic paradigms and the results of empirical research on prevailing theories.