XI. STRATEGIES FOR IMPROVING DIABETES CARE D iabetes is a chronic illness that requires continuing medical care and patient self-management education to prevent acute complications and to reduce the risk of long-term complications. Diabetes care is complex and requires that many issues, beyond glycemic control, be addressed. A large body of evidence exists that supports a range of interventions to improve diabetes outcomes. These standards of care are intended to provide clinicians, patients, researchers, payors, and other interested individuals with the components of diabetes care, treatment goals, and tools to evaluate the quality of care. While individual preferences, comorbidities, and other patient factors may require modification of goals, targets that are desirable for most patients with diabetes are provided. These standards are not intended to preclude more extensive evaluation and management of the patient by other specialists as needed. For more detailed information, refer to Bode (Ed.): Medical Management of Type 1 Diabetes (1), Burant (Ed): Medical Management of Type 2 Diabetes (2), and Klingensmith (Ed): Intensive Diabetes Management (3). The recommendations included are diagnostic and therapeutic actions that are known or believed to favorably affect health outcomes of patients with diabetes. A grading system (Table 1), developed by the American Diabetes Association (ADA) and modeled after existing methods, was utilized to clarify and codify the evidence that forms the basis for the recommendations. The level of evidence that supports each recommendation is listed after each recommendation using the letters A, B, C, or E.

Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes

OBJECTIVE — To systematically review the incidence of posttransplantation diabetes (PTD), risk factors for its development, prognostic implications, and optimal management. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS — We searched databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and others) from inception to September 2000, reviewed bibliographies in reports retrieved, contacted transplantation experts, and reviewed specialty journals. Two reviewers independently determined report inclusion (original studies, in all languages, of PTD in adults with no history of diabetes before transplantation), assessed study methods, and extracted data using a standardized form. Meta-regression was used to explain between-study differences in incidence. RESULTS — Nineteen studies with 3,611 patients were included. The 12-month cumulative incidence of PTD is lower (10% in most studies) than it was 3 decades ago. The type of immunosuppression explained 74% of the variability in incidence (P 0.0004). Risk factors were patient age, nonwhite ethnicity, glucocorticoid treatment for rejection, and immunosuppression with high-dose cyclosporine and tacrolimus. PTD was associated with decreased graft and patient survival in earlier studies; later studies showed improved outcomes. Randomized trials of treatment regimens have not been conducted. CONCLUSIONS — Physicians should consider modification of immunosuppressive regimens to decrease the risk of PTD in high-risk transplant recipients. Randomized trials are needed to evaluate the use of oral glucose-lowering agents in transplant recipients, paying particular attention to interactions with immunosuppressive drugs. Diabetes Care 25:583–592, 2002

A systematic review of the literature

Fibroblasts can condense a hydrated collagen lattice to a tissue-like structure 1/28th the area of the starting gel in 24 hr. The rate of the process can be regulated by varying the protein content of the lattice, the cell number, or the con- centration of an inhibitor such as Colcemid. Fibroblasts of high population doubling level propagated in vitro, which have left the cell cycle, can carry out the contraction at least as efficiently as cycling cells. The potential uses of the system as an immu- nologically tolerated "tissue" for wound hea ing and as a model for studying fibroblast function are discussed.

Production of a tissue-like structure by contraction of collagen lattices by human fibroblasts of different proliferative

These guidelines were developed jointly by the American Society of Health-System Pharmacists (ASHP), the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA), the Surgical Infection Society (SIS), and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA). This work represents an update to the

/pdf/clinical-practice-guidelines-for-antimicrobial-prophylaxis-1gq1adk8ux.pdf

Clinical practice guidelines for antimicrobial prophylaxis in surgery

The American Society for Apheresis (ASFA) Journal of Clinical Apheresis (JCA) Special Issue Writing Committee is charged with reviewing, updating, and categorizing indications for the evidence-based use of therapeutic apheresis in human disease. Since the 2007 JCA Special Issue (Fourth Edition), the Committee has incorporated systematic review and evidence-based approaches in the grading and categorization of apheresis indications. This Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue continues to maintain this methodology and rigor to make recommendations on the use of apheresis in a wide variety of diseases/conditions. The JCA Seventh Edition, like its predecessor, has consistently applied the category and grading system definitions in the fact sheets. The general layout and concept of a fact sheet that was used since the fourth edition has largely been maintained in this edition. Each fact sheet succinctly summarizes the evidence for the use of therapeutic apheresis in a specific disease entity. The Seventh Edition discusses 87 fact sheets (14 new fact sheets since the Sixth Edition) for therapeutic apheresis diseases and medical conditions, with 179 indications, which are separately graded and categorized within the listed fact sheets. Several diseases that are Category IV which have been described in detail in previous editions and do not have significant new evidence since the last publication are summarized in a separate table. The Seventh Edition of the JCA Special Issue serves as a key resource that guides the utilization of therapeutic apheresis in the treatment of human disease. J. Clin. Apheresis 31:149-162, 2016. © 2016 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice—Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Sixth Special Issue

Preemptive combined pancreas-kidney transplantation: Is earlier better?

Summary


As a result of the ever widening disparity between organ supply and demand, a resurgence of interest has occurred in kidney recovery from donation after cardiac death (DCD) donors. New techniques of in situ extracorporeal support offer the potential to reduce warm ischemic injury and optimize donor management prior to organ recovery. In addition, preliminary outcomes using kidneys from selected deceased donors with rising serum creatinine levels have been promising. However, contraindications to successful organ donation and transplantation may include the presence of abdominal compartment syndrome, generalized bowel infarction, refractory shock with profound metabolic and lactic acidosis, and acute anuric renal failure, particularly in the setting of DCD. We report herein the successful recovery and transplantation of kidneys from an unstable donor with the above constellation of conditions in the setting of extracorporeal support after declaration of death by asystole.

Successful kidney transplantation from a donation after cardiac death donor with acute renal failure and bowel infarction using extracorporeal support.

The role of intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy in liver transplant recipients after extensive destruction of the extrahepatic biliary system

Combined kidney-pancreas transplantation has become the treatment of choice for many patients with end-stage diabetic nephropathy. Pancreas transplantation (PTx) alone is an option for type I diabetic patients without end-stage diabetic nephropathy. Knowledge of factors contributing to or predicting the rate of renal deterioration (including the effect of CsA on the patient's renal function before transplantation) is necessary to determine candidacy for either kidney-pancreas transplantation or PTx alone. To address this issue, we selected 12 pre-uremic patients with creatinine clearances (CrCl) above 40 ml/min and less than 100 ml/min to participate in a 6-week oral CsA challenge test. Serum chemistries, including serum creatinine (SCr) and CsA level, were measured weekly. Urinary protein and CrCl were measured at 0, 2, 4, and 6 weeks. Glomerular filtration rate (GFR) (by 125I-sodium iothalamate clearance) was measured at 0, 3, and 6 weeks. All patients initially received oral CsA at 10 mg/kg/day in 2 divided doses. Doses were adjusted to maintain a 12-hr trough level of 500-1000 ng/ml using a whole blood polyclonal TDX assay. Data are presented as mean +/- SEM and as box-plot graphs. One patient was a CsA challenge test failure because SCr exceeded 3.0 mg/dl despite a reduction in CsA dose and level. Therefore, this patient was not a candidate for PTx alone and was excluded from further analysis. Among the 11 nonfailures, the mean CsA level at 6 weeks was 640 +/- 76 ng/ml. SCr increased from 1.2 +/- 0.1 mg/dl to 1.6 +/- 0.1 mg/dl (33% increase) (P = 0.0001). CrCl decreased from 82 +/- 9 ml/min to 63 +/- 8 ml/min (24% decrease) (P = 0.03). GFR decreased from 95 +/- 15 ml/min to 70 +/- 10 ml/min (26% decrease) (P = 0.009). CrCl and GFR did not differ from one another at 0 and 6 weeks (r = 0.77 and 0.98; P = 0.3 and 0.7, respectively). Urinary protein decreased from 1.0 +/- 0.3 g/day to 0.7 +/- 0.3 g/day at both 4 and 6 weeks (P = 0.03 and 0.06, respectively). Three of the 11 patients have not yet received transplants. Eight patients subsequently received PTx alone and were followed prospectively. Two allografts were lost early to rejection. Six were followed from 5 to 19 months after PTx alone. Serum creatinine and CrCL measurements during the CsA challenge test predicted post-PTx levels: SCr 1.6 +/- 0.1 vs. 1.7 +/- 0.3 mg/dl, P = 0.48, and CrCl 68 +/- 10 vs. 53 +/- 3 ml/min, P = 0.17, respectively.

Robert J. Stratta

Papers

Preemptive combined pancreas-kidney transplantation: Is earlier better?

Successful kidney transplantation from a donation after cardiac death donor with acute renal failure and bowel infarction using extracorporeal support.

The role of intrahepatic cholangiojejunostomy in liver transplant recipients after extensive destruction of the extrahepatic biliary system

Cyclosporine challenge in the decision of combined kidney-pancreas versus solitary pancreas transplantation.

Patterns of Graft Loss Following Simultaneous Kidney–Pancreas Transplantation