A new method called the neighbor-joining method is proposed for reconstructing phylogenetic trees from evolutionary distance data. The principle of this method is to find pairs of operational taxonomic units (OTUs [= neighbors]) that minimize the total branch length at each stage of clustering of OTUs starting with a starlike tree. The branch lengths as well as the topology of a parsimonious tree can quickly be obtained by using this method. Using computer simulation, we studied the efficiency of this method in obtaining the correct unrooted tree in comparison with that of five other tree-making methods: the unweighted pair group method of analysis, Farris's method, Sattath and Tversky's method, Li's method, and Tateno et al.'s modified Farris method. The new, neighbor-joining method and Sattath and Tversky's method are shown to be generally better than the other methods.

/pdf/the-neighbor-joining-method-a-new-method-for-reconstructing-j5gk4xv4lj.pdf

The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees.

The recently-developed statistical method known as the "bootstrap" can be used to place confidence intervals on phylogenies. It involves resampling points from one's own data, with replacement, to create a series of bootstrap samples of the same size as the original data. Each of these is analyzed, and the variation among the resulting estimates taken to indicate the size of the error involved in making estimates from the original data. In the case of phylogenies, it is argued that the proper method of resampling is to keep all of the original species while sampling characters with replacement, under the assumption that the characters have been independently drawn by the systematist and have evolved independently. Majority-rule consensus trees can be used to construct a phylogeny showing all of the inferred monophyletic groups that occurred in a majority of the bootstrap samples. If a group shows up 95% of the time or more, the evidence for it is taken to be statistically significant. Existing computer programs can be used to analyze different bootstrap samples by using weights on the characters, the weight of a character being how many times it was drawn in bootstrap sampling. When all characters are perfectly compatible, as envisioned by Hennig, bootstrap sampling becomes unnecessary; the bootstrap method would show significant evidence for a group if it is defined by three or more characters.

Confidence limits on phylogenies: an approach using the bootstrap.

The main purpose of this paper is to describe a process for partitioning an N-dimensional population into k sets on the basis of a sample. The process, which is called 'k-means,' appears to give partitions which are reasonably efficient in the sense of within-class variance. That is, if p is the probability mass function for the population, S = {S1, S2, * *, Sk} is a partition of EN, and ui, i = 1, 2, * , k, is the conditional mean of p over the set Si, then W2(S) = ff=ISi f z u42 dp(z) tends to be low for the partitions S generated by the method. We say 'tends to be low,' primarily because of intuitive considerations, corroborated to some extent by mathematical analysis and practical computational experience. Also, the k-means procedure is easily programmed and is computationally economical, so that it is feasible to process very large samples on a digital computer. Possible applications include methods for similarity grouping, nonlinear prediction, approximating multivariate distributions, and nonparametric tests for independence among several variables. In addition to suggesting practical classification methods, the study of k-means has proved to be theoretically interesting. The k-means concept represents a generalization of the ordinary sample mean, and one is naturally led to study the pertinent asymptotic behavior, the object being to establish some sort of law of large numbers for the k-means. This problem is sufficiently interesting, in fact, for us to devote a good portion of this paper to it. The k-means are defined in section 2.1, and the main results which have been obtained on the asymptotic behavior are given there. The rest of section 2 is devoted to the proofs of these results. Section 3 describes several specific possible applications, and reports some preliminary results from computer experiments conducted to explore the possibilities inherent in the k-means idea. The extension to general metric spaces is indicated briefly in section 4. The original point of departure for the work described here was a series of problems in optimal classification (MacQueen [9]) which represented special

/pdf/some-methods-for-classification-and-analysis-of-multivariate-4pswti19oz.pdf

Some methods for classification and analysis of multivariate observations

genalex is a user-friendly cross-platform package that runs within Microsoft Excel, enabling population genetic analyses of codominant, haploid and binary data. Allele frequency-based analyses include heterozygosity, F statistics, Nei's genetic distance, population assignment, probabilities of identity and pairwise relatedness. Distance-based calculations include amova, principal coordinates analysis (PCA), Mantel tests, multivariate and 2D spatial autocorrelation and twogener. More than 20 different graphs summarize data and aid exploration. Sequence and genotype data can be imported from automated sequencers, and exported to other software. Initially designed as tool for teaching, genalex 6 now offers features for researchers as well. Documentation and the program are available at http://www.anu.edu.au/BoZo/GenAlEx/

genalex 6: genetic analysis in Excel. Population genetic software for teaching and research

Arlequin ver 3.0 is a software package integrating several basic and advanced methods for population genetics data analysis, like the computation of standard genetic diversity indices, the estimation of allele and haplotype frequencies, tests of departure from linkage equilibrium, departure from selective neutrality and demographic equilibrium, estimation or parameters from past population expansions, and thorough analyses of population subdivision under the AMOVA framework. Arlequin 3 introduces a completely new graphical interface written in C++, a more robust semantic analysis of input files, and two new methods: a Bayesian estimation of gametic phase from multi-locus genotypes, and an estimation of the parameters of an instantaneous spatial expansion from DNA sequence polymorphism. Arlequin can handle several data types like DNA sequences, microsatellite data, or standard multi-locus genotypes. A Windows version of the software is freely available on http://cmpg.unibe.ch/software/arlequin3.

/pdf/arlequin-version-3-0-an-integrated-software-package-for-4cs6nd3y2p.pdf

Arlequin (version 3.0): An integrated software package for population genetics data analysis

Discussion of Symposium Papers on Contemporary Systematic Philosophies

A species concept has been a central tenet of biological belief since the early origins of biology as a science. The implications of this term have changed over the years: the fixed, immutable, and sharply distinct entities of the Linnaean period gave way to the more variable and intergrading units of the post-Darwinian era. For many taxonomists before and after Darwin, the species has simply implied the recognition of groups of morphologically similar individuals that differ from other such groups. Through much of biological history there has been controversy regarding the existence of species in nature. Are species real units in nature? Can the species category be defined objectively? Given an affirmative answer to the above two questions, can real organisms be assigned to one of the nonoverlapping species so delimited? Darwin's work contributed to the recognition of species as real entities. The very title of his book, On the Origin of Species, stressed this category. But as Mayr (1959) has pointed out, Darwin himself was so impressed by the variability and intergradation in the material he studied that he considered the term "species" to be arbitrary, not differing in essential features from "variety." Argument regarding these questions has persisted through changing concepts of the biological universe and with increasing insights into the genetic and ecological mechanisms governing the behavior of individuals and populations. The history of these ideas and controversies is reviewed by Mayr (1957), and we shall not enlarge upon it here. Some have considered species as man-made, arbitrary units either because of their philosophical orientation or because of the difficulty of interpreting variable material from widely ranging organisms as consisting of one or more species. These arguments have been countered by evidence of the common-sense recognition of discontinuities in nature even by lay observers (see Mayr [1963, p. 17] for an account of species recognition by New Guinea natives, but see Berlin, Breedlove, and Raven [1966] for a contrary view) and also of species recognition, pre

Robert R. Sokal

Papers

Discussion of Symposium Papers on Contemporary Systematic Philosophies

A critical evaluation

Ethnic and familial spatial patterns of abo serotypes in three medieval cemeteries

Genes, Geography, and the Human Family

Principles of Taxonomy. (Book Reviews: Phylogenetic Systematics)