scispace - formally typeset
R

Roberto Scarsini

Researcher at University of Verona

Publications -  66
Citations -  625

Roberto Scarsini is an academic researcher from University of Verona. The author has contributed to research in topics: Medicine & Internal medicine. The author has an hindex of 10, co-authored 38 publications receiving 357 citations. Previous affiliations of Roberto Scarsini include John Radcliffe Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Functional Assessment of Coronary Artery Disease in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation: Influence of Pressure Overload on the Evaluation of Lesions Severity.

TL;DR: Coronary hemodynamics are influenced by aortic valve stenosis removal, although FFR variations after TAVI are minor and crossed the diagnostic cutoff of 0.8 in a small number of patients after valve replacement.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physiologic evaluation of coronary lesions using instantaneous wave-free ratio (iFR) in patients with severe aortic stenosis undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

TL;DR: Although overall values did not change after TAVI, iFR presented significant and mostly erratic individual variations after valve replacement, and Delta iFR was influenced by the extent of the transaortic gradient drop induced by T AVI.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coronary Catheterization and Percutaneous Interventions After Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation

TL;DR: Catheterization of the coronary ostia after transfemoral TAVI with balloon or self-expandable valves is safe and feasible in almost all cases.
Journal ArticleDOI

Physiological Versus Angiographic Guidance for Myocardial Revascularization in Patients Undergoing Transcatheter Aortic Valve Implantation.

TL;DR: FFR guidance was associated with favorable outcome in this observational study in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation and Randomized trials are needed to investigate the long‐term effects of FFR‐guided revascularization against angiographic guidance alone in patients with aortsic stenosis.
Journal ArticleDOI

Coronary physiology in patients with severe aortic stenosis: Comparison between fractional flow reserve and instantaneous wave-free ratio.

TL;DR: In the presence of severe AS, conventional iFR cut-off had lower diagnostic agreement with FFR classification of coronary lesions compared to stable CAD patients, and seems to influence iFRcut-off ischemic thresholds.