scispace - formally typeset
R

Roel Smits

Researcher at Max Planck Society

Publications -  19
Citations -  1422

Roel Smits is an academic researcher from Max Planck Society. The author has contributed to research in topics: Vowel & Categorization. The author has an hindex of 13, co-authored 19 publications receiving 1306 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A comparison of vowel normalization procedures for language variation research.

TL;DR: The results show that normalization procedures that use information across multiple vowels to normalize a single vowel token performed better than those that include only information contained in the vowel token itself ("vowel-intrinsic" information).
Journal ArticleDOI

Patterns of English phoneme confusions by native and non-native listeners

TL;DR: It is concluded that the frequently reported disproportionate difficulty of non-native listening under disadvantageous conditions is not due to a disproportionate increase in phoneme misidentifications.
Journal ArticleDOI

An acoustic description of the vowels of Northern and Southern Standard Dutch.

TL;DR: The analysis of the formants indicated that Northern Standard Dutch and Southern Standard Dutch differ little in the formant frequencies at steady-state for the nine monophthongal vowels, but larger differences between these two language varieties were found for the dynamic specifications of the three long mid vowels and, to a lesser extent, of theThree diphthongAl vowels.
Journal ArticleDOI

Acoustical and perceptual analysis of the voicing distinction in Dutch initial plosives: The role of prevoicing

TL;DR: The paradox raised is that although prevoicing is the most reliable cue to the voicing distinction for listeners, it is not reliably produced by speakers.
Journal ArticleDOI

Supervised and unsupervised learning of multidimensionally varying non-native speech categories

TL;DR: In four experiments in which listeners were presented with novel categories based on vowels of Dutch, feedback was either available or not; this comparison showed supervised learning to be significantly superior to unsupervised learning.