scispace - formally typeset
R

Roger P. Rose

Researcher at University of Minnesota

Publications -  5
Citations -  88

Roger P. Rose is an academic researcher from University of Minnesota. The author has contributed to research in topics: Government & Public service motivation. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 5 publications receiving 78 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Preferences for Careers in Public Work: Examining the Government-Nonprofit Divide Among Undergraduates Through Public Service Motivation

TL;DR: This article found that commitment to public interest, compassion, and self-sacrifice should explain student interest in nonprofits as well as teaching, both fields of work students see as more directly helping and serving people.
Journal ArticleDOI

Much Obliged: Volunteering, Normative Activities, and Willingness to Serve on Juries

TL;DR: The authors examined the conceptual and empirical links between participating in voluntary activity and stated willingness to serve on a jury and found that people who volunteered some, but not too much, were more willing; an analysis of domains of volunteering showed that engaging in public service work predicted willingness.
Journal ArticleDOI

The value of outside support for male and female politicians involved in a political sex scandal.

TL;DR: It is found that male respondents gave more negative evaluations of the female governor than female respondents, and implications for the gender stereotype and social influence literatures are discussed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Student Preferences for Federal, State, and Local Government Careers: National Opportunities and Local Service

TL;DR: Although scholars have examined the federal government competition with the private sector for talented new workers, undergraduate attraction to careers in state or local government has been largescale as mentioned in this paper, finding that the majority of students choose a career in government.
Journal ArticleDOI

Case Salience and the Attitudinal Model: An Analysis of Ordered and Unanimous Votes on the Rehnquist Court

TL;DR: This paper found that the influence of attitudes on Supreme Court decisions varies by the level of case saliency, when the case before the Court raises important questions of politics or policy, and therefore attracts a disproportionate amount of attention, the attitudinal model performs admirably: the justices are more likely to split into ideologically coherent blocs and less likely to produce unanimous opinions.