R
Ronald W. Marx
Researcher at University of Arizona
Publications - 102
Citations - 15355
Ronald W. Marx is an academic researcher from University of Arizona. The author has contributed to research in topics: Science education & Curriculum. The author has an hindex of 42, co-authored 101 publications receiving 14641 citations. Previous affiliations of Ronald W. Marx include Simon Fraser University & University of Michigan.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Motivating Project-Based Learning: Sustaining the Doing, Supporting the Learning
Phyllis C. Blumenfeld,Elliot Soloway,Ronald W. Marx,Joseph Krajcik,Mark Guzdial,Annemarie Sullivan Palincsar +5 more
TL;DR: Project-based learning as discussed by the authors is a comprehensive approach to classroom teaching and learning that is designed to engage students in investigation of authentic problems, and it has the potential to help people learn.
Journal ArticleDOI
Beyond Cold Conceptual Change: The Role of Motivational Beliefs and Classroom Contextual Factors in the Process of Conceptual Change
TL;DR: The authors presented an analysis of a conceptual change model for describing student learning by applying research on student motivation to the process of conceptual change and discussed the role of classroom contextual factors as moderators of the relations between student motivation and conceptual change.
Journal ArticleDOI
Linking Teacher and Student Learning to Improve Professional Development in Systemic Reform.
TL;DR: In this paper, a model of teacher learning and an analytic framework linking professional development to student and teacher learning is presented, and evaluated using a combination of teacher reflection, classroom observation, and ongoing assessment of student performance.
Journal ArticleDOI
Inquiry in Project-Based Science Classrooms: Initial Attempts by Middle School Students
Joseph Krajcik,Phyllis C. Blumenfeld,Ronald W. Marx,Kristin M. Bass,Jennifer Fredricks,Elliot Soloway +5 more
TL;DR: For instance, this article found that middle school students were thoughtful in designing investigations and in planning procedures; for instance, they thought about controls, about samples, and about how to organize data collection However, the cases also reveal that failures to focus on the scientific merit of questions generated and to systematically collect and analyze data and draw conclusions.
Journal ArticleDOI
Supporting Students' Construction of Scientific Explanations by Fading Scaffolds in Instructional Materials
TL;DR: Fading written scaffolds better equipped students to write explanations when they were not provided with support, and showed significant learning gains for students for all components of scientific explanation.