R
Rorden Wilkinson
Researcher at University of Sussex
Publications - 100
Citations - 1776
Rorden Wilkinson is an academic researcher from University of Sussex. The author has contributed to research in topics: Global governance & Corporate governance. The author has an hindex of 23, co-authored 97 publications receiving 1664 citations. Previous affiliations of Rorden Wilkinson include University of New South Wales & University of Manchester.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Rethinking Global Governance? Complexity, Authority, Power, Change
Thomas G. Weiss,Rorden Wilkinson +1 more
TL;DR: A more rigorous conception of global governance should help us understand the nature of the contemporary phenomenon as well as look "backwards" and "forwards" as mentioned in this paper, and such an investigation should provide historical insights and prescriptive elements to understand the kind of world order that we ought to be seeking and encourage us to investigate how that global governance could be realized.
Book
Global Governance: Critical Perspectives
Rorden Wilkinson,Steve Hughes +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the role of global institutions such as the United Nations, World Trade Organization, International Monetary Fund and the World Bank has never been more important to the lives of individuals throughout the world.
The Encyclopedia of Governance
TL;DR: The Encyclopedia of Governance as mentioned in this paper provides a one-stop point of reference for the diverse and complex topics surrounding governance for the period between the collapse of the post-war consensus and the rise of neoliberal regimes in the 1970s.
Book
The WTO: Crisis and the Governance of Global Trade
TL;DR: Rorden Wilkinson explores the factors behind the collapse of World Trade Organisation (WTO) ministerials and asks why such events have not significantly disrupted the development of the multilateral trading system as discussed by the authors.
Journal ArticleDOI
Collapse at the WTO: a Cancun post‐mortem
Amrita Narlikar,Rorden Wilkinson +1 more
TL;DR: This article argued that the collapse of the talks should not be regarded as a victory for the developing world, as many have suggested, rather, the collapse should be seen as the inevitable result of deep-seated tensions within the wto's institutional framework, both in terms of the processes that underlie its working and the substance of its agreements.