R
Rudolph S. Parrish
Researcher at United States Environmental Protection Agency
Publications - 6
Citations - 111
Rudolph S. Parrish is an academic researcher from United States Environmental Protection Agency. The author has contributed to research in topics: Order statistic & Sample size determination. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 6 publications receiving 108 citations.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Characterizing the uncertainty of pesticide leaching in agricultural soils
TL;DR: A Monte-Carlo numerical simulation procedure for making regional assessments of pesticide leaching has been developed as discussed by the authors using probability density functions for organic matter, field capacity, and wilting point developed from information on approximately 3000 soils.
Journal ArticleDOI
Computing expected values of normal order statistics
TL;DR: In this paper, the expected values and standard deviations of order statistics in samples from a normal parent distribution were developed, and values were coinputed on the basis of a Gauss-Legendre quadrature technique to 25 decimal places for sample sizes of 2(1)50, 60(10)200, and 225(25)500.
Journal ArticleDOI
Conducting Field Studies for Testing Pesticide Leaching Models
TL;DR: In this article, the authors provide guidance on many of the theoretical and practical problems encountered in the design and implementation of field-scale model validation studies, including site selection and characterization, test compound selection, data needs, measurement techniques, statistical design considerations and sampling techniques.
Journal ArticleDOI
Computing variances and covariances of normal order statistics
TL;DR: In this article, a technique for computing variances and covariances of normal order statistics is presented, which provides the means to extend the precision of and correct errors in current tables.
Journal ArticleDOI
An estimate of the variability in biotransformation kinetics of xenobiotics in natural waters by aufwuchs communities
TL;DR: Differences in biotransformation rates were less variable and more detectable in quiescent waters than in faster flowing waters and no significant difference was found between sites within rivers for either xenobiotic.