During the last 30 years, deep brain stimulation (DBS) has evolved into the clinical standard of care as a highly effective treatment for advanced Parkinson's disease. Careful patient selection, an individualized anatomical target localization and meticulous evaluation of stimulation parameters for chronic DBS are crucial requirements to achieve optimal results. Current hardware-related advances allow for a more focused, individualized stimulation and hence may help to achieve optimal clinical results. However, current advances also increase the degrees of freedom for DBS programming and therefore challenge the skills of healthcare providers. This review gives an overview of the clinical effects of DBS, the criteria for patient, target, and device selection, and finally, offers strategies for a structured programming approach.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1756286419838096

An update on best practice of deep brain stimulation in Parkinson's disease.

Lumbar fusion is an accepted and effective technique for the treatment of lumbar degenerative disease. The practice has evolved continually since Albee and Hibbs independently reported the first cases in 1913, and advancements in both technique and patient selection continue through the present day. Clinical and radiological indications for surgery have been tested in trials, and other diagnostic modalities have developed and been studied. Fusion practices have also advanced; instrumentation, surgical approaches, biologics, and more recently, operative planning, have undergone stark changes at a seemingly increasing pace over the last decade. As the general population ages, treatment of degenerative lumbar disease will become a more prevalent-and costlier-issue for surgeons as well as the healthcare system overall. This review will cover the evolution of indications and techniques for fusion in degenerative lumbar disease, with emphasis on the evidence for current practices.

/pdf/state-of-the-union-a-review-of-lumbar-fusion-indications-and-24i9mqjqnq.pdf

State of the union: a review of lumbar fusion indications and techniques for degenerative spine disease.

Instrumented spine procedures have been performed for decades to treat a wide variety of spinal disorders. New technologies have been employed to obtain a high degree of precision, to minimize risks of damage to neurovascular structures and to diminish harmful exposure of patients and the operative team to ionizing radiations. Robotic spine surgery comprehends 3 major categories: telesurgical robotic systems, robotic-assisted navigation (RAN) and virtual augmented reality (AR) systems, including AR and virtual reality. Telesurgical systems encompass devices that can be operated from a remote command station, allowing to perform surgery via instruments being manipulated by the robot. On the other hand, RAN technologies are characterized by the robotic guidance of surgeon-operated instruments based on real-time imaging. Virtual AR systems are able to show images directly on special visors and screens allowing the surgeon to visualize information about the patient and the procedure (i.e., anatomical landmarks, screw direction and inclination, distance from neurological and vascular structures etc.). The aim of this review is to focus on the current state of the art of robotics and AR in spine surgery and perspectives of these emerging technologies that hold promises for future applications.

Robotic Spine Surgery and Augmented Reality Systems: A State of the Art

Over the past few decades, interest in minimally invasive spine surgery (MISS) has increased tremendously due to its core principle of minimizing approach-related injury while providing outcomes similar to traditional open spine procedures. With technical and technological advancements, MISS has expanded its utility not only to simple spinal stenosis, but also to complex spinal pathologies such as metastasis, trauma, or adult spinal deformity. In this article, we review the techniques and technology in MISS and discuss the indications, benefits, and limitations of MISS.

/pdf/minimally-invasive-spine-surgery-techniques-technologies-and-5466kgk2sr.pdf

Minimally Invasive Spine Surgery: Techniques, Technologies, and Indications.

Deep Brain Stimulation for Parkinson Disease.

Image guidance (IG) and robotics systems are becoming more widespread in their utilization and can be invaluable intraoperative adjuncts during spine surgery. Both are highly reliant upon stereotaxy and either pre- or intraoperative radiographic imaging. While user-operated IG systems have been commercially available longer and subsequently are more widely utilized across centers, robotics systems provide unique theoretical advantages over freehand and IG techniques for placing instrumentation within the spine. While there is a growing plethora of data showing that IG and robotic systems decrease the incidence of malpositioned screws, less is known about their impact on clinical outcomes. Both robotics and IG may be of particular value in cases of substantial deformity or complex anatomy. Indications for the use of these systems continue to expand with an increasing body of literature justifying their use in not only guiding thoracolumbar pedicle screw placement, but also in cases of cervical and pelvic instrumentation as well as spinal tumor resection. Both techniques also offer the potential benefit of reducing occupational exposures to ionizing radiation for the operating room staff, the surgeon, and the patient. As the use of IG and robotics in spine surgery continues to expand, these systems' value in improving surgical accuracy and clinical outcomes must be weighed against concerns over cost and workflow. As newer systems incorporating both real-time IG and robotics become more utilized, further research is necessary to better elucidate situations where these systems may be particularly beneficial in spine surgery.

Image-Guided Navigation and Robotics in Spine Surgery

Advancements in neuroimaging have led to a trend toward direct, image-based targeting under general anesthesia without the use of microelectrode recording (MER) or intraoperative test stimulation, also referred to as "asleep" deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Asleep DBS, utilizing imaging in the form of intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) or magnetic resonance imaging (iMRI), has demonstrated reliable targeting accuracy of DBS leads implanted within the globus pallidus and subthalamic nucleus while also improving clinical outcomes in patients with Parkinson's disease. In lieu, of randomized control trials, retrospective comparisons between asleep and awake DBS with MER have shown similar short-term efficacy with the potential for decreased complications in asleep cohorts. In lieu of long-term outcome data, awake DBS using MER must demonstrate more durable outcomes with fewer stimulation-induced side effects and lead revisions in order for its use to remain justifiable; although patient-specific factors may also be used to guide the decision regarding which technique may be most appropriate and tolerable to the patient.

https://www.mdpi.com/2076-3425/8/1/17/pdf

Awake versus Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Technical Considerations and Critical Review of the Literature.

Background The impact of vancomycin powder on reducing postoperative surgical site infections (SSIs) in spine surgery has been studied extensively and is considered standard of care at many institutions. More recently, vancomycin powder has been shown to reduce SSI in cranial neurosurgery; however, limited studies have been performed assessing its impact in reducing SSIs in deep brain stimulation (DBS) surgery. Objective To investigate the use of vancomycin powder as an adjunct to the current antibiotic prophylaxis regimen in DBS surgery in a large cohort of patients. Methods All patients undergoing DBS-lead implantation surgery and chest generator placement or exchange were analyzed prior to and after the implementation of intrawound vancomycin powder, and the impact on infection rate and any complications were subsequently examined. Results From 2015 to 2017, a total of 419 consecutive patients (159 in the pretreatment group, 260 in the post-treatment group) were included in the study. The rate of SSI prior to implementation of intrawound vancomycin was 3.1% (n = 5), which was reduced to 0.38% (n = 1) in the post-treatment group. No complications were noted as a direct result of using vancomycin powder. Conclusion Given its relatively low cost and side effect profile, the use of vancomycin powder may be an effective adjunct in reducing the rate of SSI in DBS surgery.

Ryan B. Kochanski

Papers

Image-Guided Navigation and Robotics in Spine Surgery

Awake versus Asleep Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery: Technical Considerations and Critical Review of the Literature.

The Utility of Vancomycin Powder in Reducing Surgical Site Infections in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery.

Optimization of Microelectrode Recording in Deep Brain Stimulation Surgery Using Intraoperative Computed Tomography.

Microelectrode accuracy in deep brain stimulation surgery.