Ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease are the principal forms of inflammatory bowel disease. Both represent chronic inflammation of the gastrointestinal tract, which displays heterogeneity in inflammatory and symptomatic burden between patients and within individuals over time. Optimal management relies on understanding and tailoring evidence-based interventions by clinicians in partnership with patients. This guideline for management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults over 16 years of age was developed by Stakeholders representing UK physicians (British Society of Gastroenterology), surgeons (Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland), specialist nurses (Royal College of Nursing), paediatricians (British Society of Paediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition), dietitians (British Dietetic Association), radiologists (British Society of Gastrointestinal and Abdominal Radiology), general practitioners (Primary Care Society for Gastroenterology) and patients (Crohn’s and Colitis UK). A systematic review of 88 247 publications and a Delphi consensus process involving 81 multidisciplinary clinicians and patients was undertaken to develop 168 evidence- and expert opinion-based recommendations for pharmacological, non-pharmacological and surgical interventions, as well as optimal service delivery in the management of both ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease. Comprehensive up-to-date guidance is provided regarding indications for, initiation and monitoring of immunosuppressive therapies, nutrition interventions, pre-, peri- and postoperative management, as well as structure and function of the multidisciplinary team and integration between primary and secondary care. Twenty research priorities to inform future clinical management are presented, alongside objective measurement of priority importance, determined by 2379 electronic survey responses from individuals living with ulcerative colitis and Crohn’s disease, including patients, their families and friends.

https://gut.bmj.com/content/gutjnl/68/Suppl_3/s1.full.pdf

British Society of Gastroenterology consensus guidelines on the management of inflammatory bowel disease in adults

Patients diagnosed with inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) are most commonly diagnosed in late adolescence or early adulthood, with half of patients being diagnosed before age 32, thus impacting peak years of reproduction and family planning. While controlled IBD has no negative effects on the ability to conceive, there is overall a trend towards voluntary childlessness due to patients' concerns for adverse fetal outcomes from underlying IBD and from adverse medication effects. Active disease at the time of conception is associated with worsening disease activity during pregnancy and carries a higher risk of poor fetal outcomes. It is therefore important to maintain remission during pregnancy, which is often achieved with pharmacologic therapy. The goal of this paper is to provide a comprehensive review of the current literature and safety data for pharmacologic treatment of IBD in pregnancy, in breastfeeding women, and in men planning to have children.

https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/pdf/10.1177/1756284819852231

Insights into the treatment of inflammatory bowel disease in pregnancy.

Background: Inflammatory autoimmune diseases are chronic diseases that often affect women of childbearing age. Therefore, detailed knowledge of the safety profile of medications used for management of inflammatory autoimmune diseases during pregnancy is important. However, in many cases the potential harmful effects of medications (especially biologics) during pregnancy (and lactation) on mother and child have not been fully identified. Objective: Our aim was to update the data on the occurrence of miscarriages and (major) congenital malformations when using biologics during pregnancy based on newly published articles. Additionally, we selected several different secondary outcomes that may be of interest for clinicians, especially information on adverse events in the use of a specific biologic during pregnancy. Material and Methods: A search was conducted from 1 January 2015 until 4 July 2019 in Embase.com, Medline Ovid, Web of Science, Cochrane CENTRAL, and Google Scholar with specific search terms for each database. Selection of publications was based on title/abstract and followed by full text (double blinded, two researchers). An overview was made based on outcomes of interest. References of the included publications were reviewed to include and minimize the missing publications. Results: A total of 143 publications were included. The total number of cases ranged from nine for canakinumab to 4276 for infliximab. The rates of miscarriages and major congenital malformations did not show relevant differences from those rates in the general population. Conclusion: Despite limitations to our study, no major safety issues were reported and no trend could be identified in the reported malformations.

/pdf/intrauterine-exposure-to-biologics-in-inflammatory-179jgmol5l.pdf

Intrauterine Exposure to Biologics in Inflammatory Autoimmune Diseases: A Systematic Review

KEY POINTS
Monoclonal antibody biologics, also known as biologics, have revolutionized the treatment and quality of life of many patients with inflammatory and autoimmune conditions. [1][1] Women of reproductive age are increasingly using these agents to maintain disease remission because of

/pdf/the-use-and-impact-of-monoclonal-antibody-biologics-during-35s2mrcv6l.pdf

The use and impact of monoclonal antibody biologics during pregnancy.

Points cles
Les agents biologiques a base d’anticorps monoclonaux, parfois appeles produits biologiques, ont revolutionne le traitement et la qualite de vie de nombreux patients atteints de maladies inflammatoires et auto-imunes[1][1]. Compte tenu des donnees emergentes concernant l’

/pdf/utilisation-et-incidence-des-agents-biologiques-a-base-d-1ouqx081zh.pdf

S Bendaoud

Papers

P817 Live-vaccines and lactation in newborn exposed in utero to anti-TNF: A multi-centre French experience in inflammatory bowel disease

Some generalizations of integral inequalities similar to Hardy’s inequality

Some generalizations of integral inequalities similar to Hardy’s inequality