Publisher Summary This chapter reviews the effects of alcohols on microorganisms. Alcohols are ubiquitous small molecules, which are produced both chemically and as products of microbial fermentation. Accumulation of alcohols in the microbial environment represents a form of environmental stress, analogous to extremes in pH value and temperature. The chapter discusses the action of ethanol and other alcohols on microorganisms, explains several important mechanisms of action. Alcohols have been employed for many years both as a disinfectant and as a preservative. Concentrations of ethanol above 15% result in immediate inactivation of most vegetative organisms, with spores being considerably more resistant. Low concentrations of ethanol also render bacteria more sensitive to inactivation by ionizing radiation and by lipophilic acids. The chapter concludes that the basic actions of alcohols on both eukaryotic and prokaryotic organisms share the same general principles. These effects appear to be dominated by the physicochemical properties of alcohols rather than involving specific receptors. All hydrophobic and electrostatic interactions in the cytosolic and envelope components of cells can potentially be affected. These include membranes, conformations of enzymes and macromolecules, activity coefficients of metabolites, permitivity, ionization potentials, pK values of functional groups, and pH value.

Effects of Alcohols on Micro-Organisms

It is now certain that the inherent ethanol tolerance of the Saccharomyces strain used is not the prime factor regulating the level of ethanol that can be produced in a high sugar brewing, wine, sake, or distillery fermentation. In fact, in terms of the maximum concentration that these yeasts can produce under batch (16 to 17% [v/v]) or fed-batch conditions, there is clearly no difference in ethanol tolerance. This is not to say, however, that under defined conditions there is no difference in ethanol tolerance among different Saccharomyces yeasts. This property, although a genetic determinant, is clearly influenced by many factors (carbohydrate level, wort nutrition, temperature, osmotic pressure/water activity, and substrate concentration), and each yeast strain reacts to each factor differently. This will indeed lead to differences in measured tolerance. Thus, it is extremely important that each of these be taken into consideration when determining "tolerance" for a particular set of fermentation conditions. The manner in which each alcohol-related industry has evolved is now known to have played a major role in determining traditional thinking on ethanol tolerance in Saccharomyces yeasts. It is interesting to speculate on how different our thinking on ethanol tolerance would be today if sake fermentations had not evolved with successive mashing and simultaneous saccharification and fermentation of rice carbohydrate, if distillers' worts were clarified prior to fermentation but brewers' wort were not, and if grape skins with their associated unsaturated lipids had not been an integral part of red wine musts. The time is now ripe for ethanol-related industries to take advantage of these findings to improve the economies of production. In the authors' opinion, breweries could produce higher alcohol beers if oxygenation (leading to unsaturated lipids) and "usable" nitrogen source levels were increased in high gravity worts. White wine fermentations could also, if desired, match the higher ethanol levels in red wines if oxygenation (to provide the unsaturated lipids deleted in part by the removal of the grape skins) were practiced and if care were given to assimilable nitrogen concentrations. This would hold true even at 10 to 14 degrees C, and the more rapid fermentations would maximize utilization of winery tankage.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)

Ethanol Tolerance in Yeasts

Summary: Accumulation of ethanol in supernatants from anaerobic cultures of Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC 431 closely paralleled growth during the early exponential phase of batch growth, and continued after growth had ceased. During the 8–64 h period of the fermentation, the intracellular ethanol concentration was greater than the extracellular concentration. Ethanol was very rapidly extracted from organisms by washing with water. During growth up to 32 h, there was a progressive decrease in fatty-acyl unsaturation in phospholipids, and a corresponding proportional increase in saturation. Thereafter, the trend was very slightly reversed. Supplementing cultures with ethanol (0.5 or 1.0m) after 8h incubation retarded growth rate, while supplementation with 1.5 m-ethanol immediately stopped growth. In cultures supplemented with 0.5 or 1.0 m-ethanol, viability was not lowered, but supplementation with 1.5 m-ethanol caused a rapid decline in viability. Supplementation of cultures with ethanol at any of the three concentrations led to an increase in the proportion of mono-unsaturated fatty-acyl residues in cellular phospholipids, especially in C18 residues, which was accompanied by a decrease in the proportion of saturated residues.

/pdf/production-and-tolerance-of-ethanol-in-relation-to-ok59dmt41z.pdf

Production and Tolerance of Ethanol in Relation to Phospholipid Fatty-acyl Composition in Saccharomyces cerevisiae NCYC 431

Biological principles for the effects of ethanol

The effects of ethanol on the fluidity of Escherichia coli plasma membranes were examined by using a variety of fluorescent probes: 1,6-diphenyl-1,3,5-hexatriene, perylene, and a set of n-(9-anthroyloxy) fatty acids. The anthroyloxy fatty acid probes were used to examine the fluidity gradient across the width of the plasma membrane and artificial membranes prepared from lipid extracts of plasma membranes. Ethanol caused a small decrease in the polarization of probes primarily located near the membrane surface. In comparison, hexanol decreased the polarization of probes located more deeply in the membrane. Temperature had a large effect on probes located at all depths. The effects of ethanol on E. coli membranes from cells grown with or without ethanol were also examined. Plasma membranes isolated from cells grown in the presence of ethanol were more rigid than those from control cells. In contrast to plasma membranes, artificial membranes prepared from lipid extracts of ethanol-grown cells were more fluid than those from control cells. These differences are explained by analyses of membrane composition. Membranes from cells grown in the presence of ethanol are more rigid than those from control cells due to a decrease in the lipid-to-protein ratio. This change more than compensates for the fluidizing effect of ethanol and the ethanol-induced increase in membrane C18:1 fatty acid which occurs during growth. Our results suggest that the regulation of the lipid-to-protein ratio of the plasma membrane may be an important adaptive response of E. coli to growth in the presence of ethanol.

S.G. Nandini-Kishore

Papers

Membrane changes during growth of Tetrahymena in the presence of ethanol.

Membrane fluidizing effects of the general anesthetic methoxyflurane elicit an acclimation response in Tetrahymena