The molar absorption coefficient, E, of a protein is usually based on concentrations measured by dry weight, nitrogen, or amino acid analysis. The studies reported here suggest that the Edelhoch method is the best method for measuring E for a protein. (This method is described by Gill and von Hippel [1989, Anal Biochem 182:3193261 and is based on data from Edelhoch [1967, Biochemistry 6:1948-19541.) The absorbance of a protein at 280 nm depends on the content of Trp, Tyr, and cystine (disulfide bonds). The average E values for these chromophores in a sample of 18 well-characterized proteins have been estimated, and the E values in water, propanol, 6 M guanidine hydrochloride (GdnHCI), and 8 M urea have been measured. For Trp, the average E values for the proteins are less than the E values measured in any of the solvents. For Tyr, the average E values for the proteins are intermediate between those measured in 6 M GdnHCl and those measured in propanol. Based on a sample of 116 measured t values for 80 proteins, the t at 280 nm of a folded protein in water, t(280), can best be predicted with this equation:

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1002/pro.5560041120

How to measure and predict the molar absorption coefficient of a protein.

The stabilization of proteins by sucrose.

An improved method is described for the purification of the DNA-dependent RNA polymerase [ribonucleosidetriphosphate:RNA nucleotidyltransferase, EC 2.7.7.6] from Escherichia coli. The method involves lysozyme-sodium deoxycholate lysis, low-speed centrifugation, precipitation with Polymin P, elution from the Polymin P precipitate, ammonium sulfate precipitation, and chromatography on DNA-cellulose and Bio-Gel A 5m. RNA polymerase is purified to electrophoretic homogeneity in 2 days with a recovery of 45%, resulting in a yield of 250 mg of holoenzyme from 500 g of cells.

A procedure for the rapid, large-scall purification of Escherichia coli DNA-dependent RNA polymerase involving Polymin P precipitation and DNA-cellulose chromatography.

Publisher Summary This chapter reviews that the simplest way of accounting for the absorption spectrum of a protein is as the sum of the spectra of its components. This gives results which are often good approximations to the observed protein spectrum. The assumption of additivity is basic for useful analytical applications of spectral measurements. It discusses that in another perspective, the failure of perfect additivity of the component absorptivities affords the possibility of obtaining structural information about proteins. The absorptivity of the peptide bond can change by as much as a factor of two with a change in the conformation of a peptide chain. Since the absorptivity of aromatic side chains is much less sensitive to environmental change, correspondingly, more sensitive techniques are required to measure the small changes which do occur. The nature and limitations of the structural information resulting from both peptide-bond and side-chain absorption are discussed. Absorption spectra can occasionally be a useful tool in the identification of unusual structural features in proteins and polypeptides. Several such applications are also explained in this chapter.

Ultraviolet spectra Of Proteins and Amino Acids

The measurement of protein concentration in an aqueous sample is an important assay in biochemistry research and development labs for applications ranging from enzymatic studies to providing data for biopharmaceutical lot release. Spectrophotometric protein quantitation assays are methods that use UV and visible spectroscopy to rapidly determine the concentration of protein, relative to a standard, or using an assigned extinction coefficient. Methods are described to provide information on how to analyze protein concentration using UV protein spectroscopy measurements, traditional dye-based absorbance measurements; BCA, Lowry, and Bradford assays and the fluorescent dye-based assays; amine derivatization and detergent partition assays. The observation that no single assay dominates the market is due to specific limitations of certain methods that investigators need to consider before selecting the most appropriate assay for their sample. Many of the dye-based assays have unique chemical mechanisms that are prone to interference from chemicals prevalent in many biological buffer preparations. A discussion of which assays are prone to interference and the selection of alternative methods is included.

https://www.researchgate.net/file.PostFileLoader.html?id=5579ae515e9d9733ac8b4575&assetKey=AS%3A273794600505367%401442289127968

S. J. Leach

Papers

Effect of Light Scattering on Ultraviolet Difference Spectra1