S
Sally M Thomas
Researcher at University of Bristol
Publications - 122
Citations - 5444
Sally M Thomas is an academic researcher from University of Bristol. The author has contributed to research in topics: Professional learning community & Value (mathematics). The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 121 publications receiving 5113 citations. Previous affiliations of Sally M Thomas include University of London & Institute of Education.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Professional Learning Communities: A Review of the Literature
TL;DR: The capacity is a complex blend of motivation, skill, positive learning, organizational conditions and culture, and infrastructure of support as mentioned in this paper, which gives individuals, groups, whole school communities and school systems the power to get involved in and sustain learning over time.
Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning Communities
TL;DR: In this article, the main finding from the Creating and Sustaining Effective Professional Learning Communities (EPLC) project was summarised, which was funded by the Department for Education and Skills (DfES), the General Teaching Council for England (GTCe), and the National College for School Leadership (NCSL).
Book
Forging Links: Effective Schools and Effective Departments
TL;DR: This book discusses the study of Academic Departmental Differences in Effectiveness in Schools and its implications for School Improvement.
Journal ArticleDOI
A Multilevel Analysis of School Examination Results
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors analyse the results of inner London schools in relation to intake achievement, pupil gender and school type, and find that confidence intervals for school "residuals" or "effects" are wide, so that few schools can be separated reliably.
Journal Article
Using Examination Results as Indicators of School and College Performance
Harvey Goldstein,Sally M Thomas +1 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors argue that institutional comparisons based on average, unadjusted, examination results are inadequate and potentially misleading for several reasons, such as: aggregate data obscure important information; the failure to take account of prior achievement leads to inaccurate and misleading inferences about school differences and they are always out of date because they refer to a cohort who began attending the institutions several years earlier.