Showing papers by "Sanjeev Saksena published in 2022"

AIM‐AF: A Physician Survey in the United States and Europe

Abstract: Background Guideline recommendations are the accepted reference for selection of therapies for rhythm control of atrial fibrillation (AF). This study was designed to understand physicians’ treatment practices and adherence to guidelines. Methods and Results The AIM‐AF (Antiarrhythmic Medication for Atrial Fibrillation) study was an online survey of clinical cardiologists and electrophysiologists that was conducted in the United States and Europe (N=629). Respondents actively treated ≥30 patients with AF who received drug therapy, and had received or were referred for ablation every 3 months. The survey comprised 96 questions on physician demographics, AF types, and treatment practices. Overall, 54% of respondents considered guidelines to be the most important nonpatient factor influencing treatment choice. Across most queried comorbidities, amiodarone was selected by 60% to 80% of respondents. Other nonadherent usage included sotalol by 21% in patients with renal impairment; dofetilide initiation (16%, United States only) outside of hospital; class Ic agents by 6% in coronary artery disease; and dronedarone by 8% in patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction. Additionally, rhythm control strategies were frequently chosen in asymptomatic AF (antiarrhythmic drugs [AADs], 35%; ablation, 8%) and subclinical AF (AADs, 38%; ablation, 13%). Despite guideline algorithms emphasizing safety first, efficacy (48%) was selected as the most important consideration for AAD choice, followed by safety (34%). Conclusions Despite surveyed clinicians recognizing the importance of guidelines, nonadherence was frequently observed. While deviation may be reasonable in selected patients, in general, nonadherence has the potential to compromise patient safety. These findings highlight an underappreciation of the safe use of AADs, emphasizing the need for interventions to support optimal AAD selection.

Abstract 12553: Adverse Cardiovascular Outcomes in Heart Failure (HF) With Preserved Systolic Function Associated With Atrial Fibrillation Are Due to Loss of Rhythm Control Impacting HF Status : A Propensity Score Matched Analysis of the TOPCAT Americas Study

Abstract: Background: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is associated with excess mortality and cardiovascular (CV) hospitalizations in HF patients (pts) with preserved systolic function (pEF), Whether this is due to advanced co-morbidities or loss of atrioventricular (AV) synchrony & rate control in AF is unclear. Hypothesis: To analyze the independent impact of AF on clinical outcomes of HFpEF pts in the TOPCAT AMERICAS study using propensity score matched (PSM) cohorts to account for confounding by other comorbidities. Methods: Study cohorts were matched for 20 clinical, demographic & ECG variables. 3 matched cohorts based on baseline rhythm status at study entry were compared viz. subjects in sinus rhythm (SR), subjects in AF on baseline ECG & subjects with Any AF event by history or ECG. We analyzed CV mortality, adjudicated modes of death & morbidity during a mean follow up period of 2.9 yrs. Results: 418 subjects in SR (SR cohort) were PSM with 418 subjects in AF on baseline ECG (AF on ECG cohort) & 418 pts with any AF event by history or ECG (Any AF cohort) at study entry. Any AF increased risk of CV death(D), pump failure death (PFD), CV and HF hospitalization(H) and HF progression. AF on ECG increased risk of CVD, CVH, HFH and PFD (Tables). Neither AF cohort increased risk of sudden death (SD) {Figure}. Conclusion: 1. AF is an independent risk factor for worsening CV outcomes in HFpEF. 2. This increased risk is due to a selective increase in HF worsening, HFH and PFD rather than SD. 3. Loss of AV synchrony & rate control in AF can independently impact HF progression in HFpEF with consequent HFH and PFD. Restoration of SR may offer benefits for CV outcomes in HFpEF & warrants evaluation.