Circadian cycles affect a variety of physiological processes, and disruptions of normal circadian biology therefore have the potential to influence a range of disease-related pathways. The genetic basis of circadian rhythms is well studied in model organisms and, more recently, studies of the genetic basis of circadian disorders has confirmed the conservation of key players in circadian biology from invertebrates to humans. In addition, important advances have been made in understanding how these molecules influence physiological functions in tissues throughout the body. Together, these studies set the scene for applying our knowledge of circadian biology to the understanding and treatment of a range of human diseases, including cancer and metabolic and behavioural disorders.

/pdf/the-genetics-of-mammalian-circadian-order-and-disorder-bpbner8gua.pdf

The Genetics of Mammalian Circadian Order and Disorder: Implications for Physiology and Disease

In October, 2007, 24 scientists from ten countries met at the International Agency for Research on Cancer (IARC), Lyon, France, to assess the carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fi re-fi ghting. These assessments will be published as volume 98 of the IARC Monographs. About 15–20% of the working population in Europe and the USA is engaged in shift-work that involves nightwork, which is most prevalent (above 30%) in the health-care, industrial manufactur ing, mining, transport, communication, leisure, and hospitality sectors. Among the many diff erent patterns of shiftwork, those including nightwork are the most disruptive for the circadian clock. Six of eight epidemiological studies from various geographical regions, most notably two independent cohort studies of nurses engaged in shiftwork at night, have noted a modestly increased risk of breast cancer in long-term employees compared with those who are not engaged in shiftwork at night. These studies are limited by potential confounding and inconsistent defi nitions of shiftwork, with several focused on a single profession. The incidence of breast cancer was also modestly increased in most cohorts of female fl ight attendants, who also experience circadian disruption by frequently crossing time zones. Limitations of studies in these fl ight attendants include the potential for detection bias, proxy measures of exposure, and potential uncontrolled confounding by reproductive factors and cosmic radiation. Several diff erent rodent models have been used to test the eff ect of disruption of the circadian system on tumour development. More than 20 studies investigated the eff ect of constant light, dim light at night, simulated chronic jet lag, or circadian timing of carcinogens, and most showed a major increase in tumour incidence. No clear eff ect was seen for light pulses at night or constant darkness. A similar number of studies investigated the eff ect of reduced nocturnal melatonin concentrations or removal of the pineal gland (where melatonin is produced) in tumour development and most showed increases in the incidence or growth of tumours. Exposure to light at night disturbs the circadian system with alterations of sleep-activity patterns, suppression of melatonin production, and de regul ation of circadian genes involved in cancer-related pathways. Inactivation of the circadian Period gene, Per2, promotes tumour develop ment in mice, and in human breast and endo metrial tumours, the expression of PERIOD genes is inhibited. In animals, melatonin suppression can lead to changes in the gonadotrophin axis. In humans, sleep deprivation and the ensuing melatonin suppression lead to immunodefi ciency. For example, sleep deprivation suppresses natural killer-cell activity and changes the T-helper 1/T-helper 2 cytokine balance, reducing cellular immune defence and surveillance. On the basis of “limited evidence in humans for the carcinogenicity of shift-work that involves nightwork”, and “suffi cient evidence in experimental animals for the carcinogenicity of light during the daily dark period (biological night)”, the Working Group concluded that “shift-work that involves circadian disruption is probably carcinogenic to humans” (Group 2A). Painters are potentially exposed to many chemicals used as pigments, extenders, binders, solvents, and additives. Painters can also be exposed to other workplace hazards, such as asbestos or crystalline silica. Cohort and linkage studies of painters have shown consistent and signifi cant increases in lung cancer compared with the general population. No information on tobacco smoking was available in the cohort studies; however, the increases are comparable to results from many case–control studies that controlled for smoking. A meta-analysis by the Working Group of all independent studies, including two recent large studies, showed a signifi cant excess risk of about 20% overall, and of 50% when the analysis was restricted to smoking-adjusted estimates from population-based case–control studies. Increased mortality from mesothelioma was consistently noted. Similarly, cohort and linkage studies showed consistent 20–25% increases in the occurrence of urinary bladder cancer in painters, and similar increases were noted in case– control studies that controlled for smoking. Although fi ndings for lymphatic and haemopoietic cancers in painters were inconsistent, four of fi ve case– control studies reported signifi cant increases in childhood leukaemia associated with maternal exposure to paint. The risks tended to be greater when mothers were exposed before or during, rather than after, pregnancy, and two studies showed some evidence of an increasing risk with increasing exposure. Upcoming meetings February 5–12, 2008 Industrial and cosmetic dyes and related exposures

https://www.thelancet.com/pdfs/journals/lanonc/PIIS1470-2045%2807%2970373-X.pdf

Carcinogenicity of shift-work, painting, and fire-fighting.

A substantial body of research has investigated the associations between stress-related psychosocial factors and cancer outcomes. Previous narrative reviews have been inconclusive. In this Review, we evaluated longitudinal associations between stress and cancer using meta-analytic methods. The results of 165 studies indicate that stress-related psychosocial factors are associated with higher cancer incidence in initially healthy populations (P = 0.005); in addition, poorer survival in patients with diagnosed cancer was noted in 330 studies (P <0.001), and higher cancer mortality was seen in 53 studies (P <0.001). Subgroup meta-analyses demonstrate that stressful life experiences are related to poorer cancer survival and higher mortality but not to an increased incidence. Stress-prone personality or unfavorable coping styles and negative emotional responses or poor quality of life were related to higher cancer incidence, poorer cancer survival and higher cancer mortality. Site-specific analyses indicate that psychosocial factors are associated with a higher incidence of lung cancer and poorer survival in patients with breast, lung, head and neck, hepatobiliary, and lymphoid or hematopoietic cancers. These analyses suggest that stress-related psychosocial factors have an adverse effect on cancer incidence and survival, although there is evidence of publication bias and results should be interpreted with caution.

Do stress-related psychosocial factors contribute to cancer incidence and survival?

The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution have been a longstanding source of concern, accentuated by realized and projected growth in electrical lighting. As human communities and lighting technologies develop, artificial light increasingly modifies natural light regimes by encroaching on dark refuges in space, in time, and across wavelengths. A wide variety of ecological implications of artificial light have been identified. However, the primary research to date is largely focused on the disruptive influence of nighttime light on higher vertebrates, and while comprehensive reviews have been compiled along taxonomic lines and within specific research domains, the subject is in need of synthesis within a common mechanistic framework. Here we propose such a framework that focuses on the cross-factoring of the ways in which artificial lighting alters natural light regimes (spatially, temporally, and spectrally), and the ways in which light influences biological systems, particularly the distinction between light as a resource and light as an information source. We review the evidence for each of the combinations of this cross-factoring. As artificial lighting alters natural patterns of light in space, time and across wavelengths, natural patterns of resource use and information flows may be disrupted, with downstream effects to the structure and function of ecosystems. This review highlights: (i) the potential influence of nighttime lighting at all levels of biological organisation (from cell to ecosystem); (ii) the significant impact that even low levels of nighttime light pollution can have; and (iii) the existence of major research gaps, particularly in terms of the impacts of light at population and ecosystem levels, identification of intensity thresholds, and the spatial extent of impacts in the vicinity of artificial lights.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/brv.12036

The ecological impacts of nighttime light pollution: a mechanistic appraisal

Background Shift work, including night work, has been hypothesized to increase the risk of chronic diseases, including cancer, cardiovascular disease (CVD), metabolic syndrome and diabetes. Recent reviews of evidence relating to these hypotheses have focussed on specific diseases or potential mechanisms, but no general summary of the current data on shift work and chronic disease has been published.

Methods Systematic and critical reviews and recent original studies indexed in PubMed prior to 31 December 2009 were retrieved, aided by manual searches of reference lists. The main conclusions from reviews and principle results from recent studies are presented in text and tables.

Results Published evidence is suggestive but not conclusive for an adverse association between night work and breast cancer but limited and inconsistent for cancers at other sites and all cancers combined. Findings on shift work, in relation to risks of CVD, metabolic syndrome and diabetes are also suggestive but not conclusive for an adverse relationship.

Conclusions Heterogeneity of study exposures and outcomes and emphasis on positive but non-significant results make it difficult to draw general conclusions. Further data are needed for additional disease endpoints and study populations.

/pdf/shift-work-and-chronic-disease-the-epidemiological-evidence-501ny57t4n.pdf

Shift work and chronic disease: the epidemiological evidence

http://www.armoni.dk/sites/default/files/Armoni_Fildeling/files/Public/Uddannelse/Kursusmaterialer/cancer2johnni_hansen.pdf

Sarah P. Megdal

Papers

Night work and breast cancer risk: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Correlates for poor sleepers in a Los Angeles high school.