scispace - formally typeset
S

Scott G. Goddard

Researcher at Southern Cross University

Publications -  9
Citations -  61

Scott G. Goddard is an academic researcher from Southern Cross University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Psychological intervention & Computer science. The author has an hindex of 2, co-authored 5 publications receiving 11 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

A systematic review of flow interventions in sport and exercise

TL;DR: A systematic review and evaluation of flow interventions in sport and exercise is presented in this paper, which suggests interventions reported to date have largely been unsuccessful at producing flow experiences, and recommendations are made to improve the efficacy of Flow interventions in future.
Journal ArticleDOI

The (over)use of SMART goals for physical activity promotion: A narrative review and critique

TL;DR: A narratively review and critically examine the scientific underpinnings of the SMART acronym and its application in physical activity promotion suggests that the SMart acronym is not based on scientific theory; is not consistent with empirical evidence; does not consider what type of goal is set; and has redundancy in its criteria.
Journal ArticleDOI

The event-focused interview: what is it, why is it useful, and how is it used?

TL;DR: There has been a longstanding interest in understanding how people think, feel, and behave in sport and exercise activities as mentioned in this paper, although naturalistic recordings, momentary assessments, and post-event qu...
Journal ArticleDOI

The Flow-Clutch Scale: Development and preliminary validation in sport and exercise

TL;DR: The Flow-Clutch Scale as mentioned in this paper describes two overlapping psychological states that underlie exceptional performance and rewarding exercise experiences: flow and clutch states, and is used in sport and exercise.
Journal ArticleDOI

Exploring runners’ perspectives of potential strategies for flow interventions

TL;DR: In this paper , the authors examined runners' perspectives on potential strategies that should be considered during the development of flow interventions, and provided researchers with detailed end-user perspectives of strategies that may inform the development, and in turn, increase the likelihood of their efficacy.