Scott J. Shapiro

TL;DR: In this article, the authors present a philosophy of natural law: Natural Law: The Classical Tradition, Natural Law The Modern Tradition, Exclusive Legal Positivism 4. Inclusive legal positivism 5. Formalism 6. Adjudication 7. Constitutional and Statutory Interpretation 8. Legal and Political Philosophy 10. Authority 11. Reasons 12. Rights 13. Law and Obligations 14. Responsibility 15. Private Law 16. Tort Law 17. Philosophy of Private Law 18. Contract Law 19. Property Law 20. The Philosophy of Criminal Law 21. International Law 22

TL;DR: The Hart-Dworkin debate as discussed by the authors is a classic example of a philosophical debate about the relation between law and morality, and it has been studied extensively in the legal community.

TL;DR: The results indicate that passive antibody-mediated protection against C. neoformans requires both Th1- and Th2-associated cytokines and reveal the complexity of the mechanisms through which antibodies modulate infection with this organism.

TL;DR: In the absence of C3, all IgG isotypes prolonged the lives of mice infected with C. neoformans, indicating that protection by IgG does not require the complement pathways, and protection with IgG3 in the complement-deficient mice was observed, suggesting that complement is involved in the lack of protection observed with Igg3 in other mouse models.

TL;DR: It is hard to think of a more banal statement one could make about the law than to say that it necessarily claims legal authority to govern conduct as mentioned in this paper. But no one has ever denied (how could they?) that the law holds itself out as having the legal power to tell us what we may or may not do.