scispace - formally typeset
S

Sebastian M. Schmon

Researcher at University of Oxford

Publications -  19
Citations -  171

Sebastian M. Schmon is an academic researcher from University of Oxford. The author has contributed to research in topics: Computer science & Bayesian probability. The author has an hindex of 4, co-authored 10 publications receiving 61 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

AnoDDPM: Anomaly Detection with Denoising Diffusion Probabilistic Models using Simplex Noise

TL;DR: A novel partial diffusion anomaly detection strategy that scales to high-resolution imagery, named AnoDDPM, and a multi-scale simplex noise diffusion process that gives control over the target anomaly size is developed.
Journal ArticleDOI

Large-sample asymptotics of the pseudo-marginal method

TL;DR: A study of this limiting chain allows us to provide parameter dimension-dependent guidelines on how to optimally scale a normal random walk proposal, and the number of Monte Carlo samples for the pseudo-marginal method in the large-sample regime.
Journal ArticleDOI

Estimating the density of ethnic minorities and aged people in Berlin: multivariate kernel density estimation applied to sensitive georeferenced administrative data protected via measurement error

TL;DR: This work proposes multivariate non-parametric kernel density estimation that reverses the rounding process by using a Bayesian measurement error model, applied to the Berlin register of residents for deriving density estimates of ethnic minorities and aged people.
Journal ArticleDOI

Investigating the Impact of Model Misspecification in Neural Simulation-based Inference

TL;DR: It is concluded that new approaches are required to address model misspecification if neural SBI algorithms are to be relied upon to derive accurate conclusions about stochastic simulation models.
Posted Content

Generalized Posteriors in Approximate Bayesian Computation

TL;DR: First, the accept/reject step in ABC is re-interpreted as an implicitly defined error model, and it is argued that these implicit error models will invariably be misspecified.