scispace - formally typeset
S

Sena Koleva

Researcher at New York University

Publications -  5
Citations -  974

Sena Koleva is an academic researcher from New York University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Morality & Moral psychology. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 5 publications receiving 760 citations. Previous affiliations of Sena Koleva include University of California, Irvine & University of Southern California.

Papers
More filters
Book ChapterDOI

Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism

TL;DR: The Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) as discussed by the authors was created to answer these questions, including: where does morality come from? Why are moral judgments often so similar across cultures, yet sometimes so variable? Is morality one thing, or many?
Book Chapter

Moral Foundations Theory: The Pragmatic Validity of Moral Pluralism

TL;DR: The Moral Foundations Theory (MFT) as discussed by the authors was created to answer these questions, including: where does morality come from? Why are moral judgments often so similar across cultures, yet sometimes so variable? Is morality one thing, or many?
Journal ArticleDOI

Understanding Libertarian Morality: The Psychological Roots of an Individualist Ideology

TL;DR: The authors found that, compared to liberals and conservatives, libertarians show stronger endorsement of individual liberty as their foremost guiding principle and correspondingly weaker endorsement of other moral principles, a relatively cerebral as opposed to emotional intellectual style, and lower interdependence and social relatedness.
Journal ArticleDOI

Moral judgment toward relationship betrayals and those who commit them

TL;DR: Selterman et al. as discussed by the authors examined moral judgments toward relationship betrayals, and how these judgments depended on whether characters and their actions were perceived to be pure and loyal compared to the level of harm caused.
Journal ArticleDOI

Beyond Kohlberg vs. Gilligan: Empathy and Disgust Sensitivity Mediate Gender Differences in Moral Judgments

TL;DR: This article found that women have stronger moral concerns related to care and purity, are less utilitarian, have a stronger sense of moral identity, and moralize everyday actions more than men, and these effects are mediated by gender differences in the emotion tendencies of empathic concern and disgust sensitivity.