scispace - formally typeset
S

Shu-Chuen Li

Researcher at University of Newcastle

Publications -  184
Citations -  6155

Shu-Chuen Li is an academic researcher from University of Newcastle. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Population. The author has an hindex of 38, co-authored 181 publications receiving 5465 citations. Previous affiliations of Shu-Chuen Li include Health Sciences Authority & Alfred Hospital.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Factors affecting therapeutic compliance: A review from the patient's perspective.

TL;DR: From the literature review, it would appear that the definition of therapeutic compliance is adequately resolved and the factors related to compliance may be better categorized as “soft” and “hard” factors as the approach in countering their effects may differ.
Journal ArticleDOI

Metabolism and Transport of Oxazaphosphorines and the Clinical Implications

TL;DR: This review highlights the metabolism and transport of these oxazaphosphorines (mainly CPA and IFO, as these two oxazphosphorine drugs are the most widely used alkylating agents) and the clinical implications.
Journal ArticleDOI

The impact of diabetes mellitus and other chronic medical conditions on health-related Quality of Life: is the whole greater than the sum of its parts?

TL;DR: DM and chronic medical conditions generally reduced HRQoL in this multiethnic general population in an additive, rather than synergistic or subtractive fashion.
Journal ArticleDOI

Progression of Parkinson's disease as evaluated by Hoehn and Yahr stage transition times†

TL;DR: H&Y transition time is a useful measure of disease progression in PD and may be utilized in clinical studies evaluating therapeutic interventions and prognostic factors in PD.
Journal ArticleDOI

Does the 12-item General Health Questionnaire contain multiple factors and do we need them?

TL;DR: The 12-item General Health Questionnaire contains three factors, namely Anxiety and Depression, Social Dysfunction, and Loss of Confidence, Nevertheless, using them separately does not offer many practical advantages in differentiating clinical groups or identifying association with clinical or health-related quality of life variables.