S
Signe Flottorp
Researcher at Norwegian Institute of Public Health
Publications - 152
Citations - 24433
Signe Flottorp is an academic researcher from Norwegian Institute of Public Health. The author has contributed to research in topics: Health care & Psychological intervention. The author has an hindex of 43, co-authored 139 publications receiving 20282 citations. Previous affiliations of Signe Flottorp include University of Oslo & Norwegian Directorate for Health and Social Affairs.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 3: how to assess methodological limitations
Heather Menzies Munthe-Kaas,Meghan A. Bohren,Claire Glenton,Simon Lewin,Simon Lewin,Jane Noyes,Özge Tunçalp,Andrew Booth,Ruth Garside,Christopher J. Colvin,Megan Wainwright,Arash Rashidian,Arash Rashidian,Signe Flottorp,Benedicte Carlsen +14 more
TL;DR: The methodological limitations component and its rationale is described and guidance on how to assess methodological limitations of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach is offered.
Journal ArticleDOI
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings-paper 5: how to assess adequacy of data
Claire Glenton,Benedicte Carlsen,Simon Lewin,Simon Lewin,Heather Menzies Munthe-Kaas,Christopher J. Colvin,Özge Tunçalp,Meghan A. Bohren,Jane Noyes,Andrew Booth,Ruth Garside,Arash Rashidian,Arash Rashidian,Signe Flottorp,Megan Wainwright +14 more
TL;DR: The adequacy component and its rationale is described and guidance on how to assess data adequacy in the context of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach is offered.
Journal ArticleDOI
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings–paper 6: how to assess relevance of the data
Jane Noyes,Andrew Booth,Simon Lewin,Simon Lewin,Benedicte Carlsen,Claire Glenton,Christopher J. Colvin,Ruth Garside,Meghan A. Bohren,Arash Rashidian,Arash Rashidian,Megan Wainwright,Özge Tunςalp,Jacqueline Chandler,Signe Flottorp,Tomas Pantoja,Joseph D. Tucker,Heather Menzies Munthe-Kaas +17 more
TL;DR: The relevance component and its rationale is described and guidance on how to assess relevance in the context of a review finding is offered, as well as examples of relevance assessments.
Journal ArticleDOI
GRADE guidelines: 20. Assessing the certainty of evidence in the importance of outcomes or values and preferences-inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains.
Yuan Zhang,Pablo Alonso Coello,Gordon H. Guyatt,Juan José Yepes-Nuñez,Elie A. Akl,Glen Hazlewood,Hector Pardo-Hernandez,Itziar Etxeandia-Ikobaltzeta,Amir Qaseem,John W Williams,Peter Tugwell,Signe Flottorp,Yaping Chang,Yuqing Zhang,Reem A. Mustafa,María Ximena Rojas,Feng Xie,Holger J. Schünemann +17 more
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors provide guidance and examples for rating inconsistency, imprecision, and other domains for a body of evidence describing the relative importance of outcomes, and also provide suggestions on how to detect publication bias and discuss the domains to rate up the certainty.
Journal ArticleDOI
Applying GRADE-CERQual to qualitative evidence synthesis findings—paper 4: how to assess coherence
Christopher J. Colvin,Ruth Garside,Megan Wainwright,Heather Menzies Munthe-Kaas,Claire Glenton,Meghan A. Bohren,Benedicte Carlsen,Özge Tunçalp,Jane Noyes,Andrew Booth,Arash Rashidian,Arash Rashidian,Signe Flottorp,Simon Lewin,Simon Lewin +14 more
TL;DR: The coherence component and its rationale is described and guidance on how to assess coherence in the context of a review finding as part of the CERQual approach is offered.