Cytochrome P450 (CYP) 2D6 is one of the most investigated CYPs in relation to genetic polymorphism, but accounts for only a small percentage of all hepatic CYPs (∼2–4%). There is a large interindividual variation in the enzyme activity of CYP2D6. The enzyme is largely non-inducible and metabolizes ∼25% of current drugs. Typical substrates for CYP2D6 are largely lipophilic bases and include some antidepressants, antipsychotics, antiarrhythmics, antiemetics, β-adrenoceptor antagonists (β-blockers) and opioids. The CYP2D6 activity ranges considerably within a population and includes ultrarapid metabolizers (UMs), extensive metabolizers (EMs), intermediate metabolizers (IMs) and poor metabolizers (PMs). There is a considerable variability in the CYP2D6 allele distribution among different ethnic groups, resulting in variable percentages of PMs, IMs, EMs and UMs in a given population. To date, 74 allelic variants and a series of subvariants of the CYP2D6 gene have been reported and the number of alleles is still growing. Among these are fully functional alleles, alleles with reduced function and null (non-functional) alleles, which convey a wide range of enzyme activity, from no activity to ultrarapid metabolism of substrates. As a consequence, drug adverse effects or lack of drug effect may occur if standard doses are applied. The alleles *10, *17, *36 and *41 give rise to substrate-dependent decreased activity. Null alleles of CYP2D6 do not encode a functional protein and there is no detectable residual enzymatic activity. It is clear that alleles *3, *4, *5, *6, *7, *8, *11, *12, *13, *14, *15, *16, *18, *19, *20, *21, *38, *40, *42, *44, *56 and *62 have no enzyme activity. They are responsible for the PM phenotype when present in homozygous or compound heterozygous constellations. These alleles are of clinical significance as they often cause altered drug clearance and drug response. Among the most important variants are CYP2D6*2, *3, *4, *5, *10, *17 and *41. On the other hand, the CYP2D6 gene is subject to copy number variations that are often associated with the UM phenotype. Marked decreases in drug concentrations have been observed in UMs with tramadol, venlafaxine, morphine, mirtazapine and metoprolol. The functional impact of CYP2D6 alleles may be substrate-dependent. For example, CYP2D6*17 is generally considered as an allele with reduced function, but it displays remarkable variability in its activity towards substrates such as dextromethorphan, risperidone, codeine and haloperidol. The clinical consequence of the CYP2D6 polymorphism can be either occurrence of adverse drug reactions or altered drug response. Drugs that are most affected by CYP2D6 polymorphisms are commonly those in which CYP2D6 represents a substantial metabolic pathway either in the activation to form active metabolites or clearance of the agent. For example, encainide metabolites are more potent than the parent drug and thus QRS prolongation is more apparent in EMs than in PMs. In contrast, propafenone is a more potent b-blocker than its metabolites and the β-blocking activity during propafenone therapy is more prominent in PMs than EMs, as the parent drug accumulates in PMs. Since flecainide is mainly eliminated through renal excretion, and both R- and S-flecainide possess equivalent potency for sodium channel inhibition, the CYP2D6 phenotype has a minor impact on the response to flecainide. Since the contribution of CYP2D6 is greater for metoprolol than for carvedilol, propranolol and timolol, a stronger gene-dose effect is seen with this β-blocker, while such an effect is lesser or marginal in other β-blockers. Concordant genotype-phenotype correlation provides a basis for predicting the phenotype based on genetic testing, which has the potential to achieve optimal pharmacotherapy. However, genotype testing for CYP2D6 is not routinely performed in clinical practice and there is uncertainty regarding genotype-phenotype, gene-concentration and gene-dose relationships. Further prospective studies on the clinical impact of CYP2D6-dependent metabolism of drugs are warranted in large cohorts of subjects.

Polymorphism of human cytochrome P450 2D6 and its clinical significance: part II.

Genetic factors contribute to the phenotype of drug response. We systematically analyzed all available pharmacogenetic data from Medline databases (1970-2003) on the impact that genetic polymorphisms have on positive and adverse reactions to antidepressants and antipsychotics. Additionally, dose adjustments that would compensate for genetically caused differences in blood concentrations were calculated. To study pharmacokinetic effects, data for 36 antidepressants were screened. We found that for 20 of those, data on polymorphic CYP2D6 or CYP2C19 were found and that in 14 drugs such genetic variation would require at least doubling of the dose in extensive metabolizers in comparison to poor metabolizers. Data for 38 antipsychotics were examined: for 13 of those CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 genotype was of relevance. To study the effects of genetic variability on pharmacodynamic pathways, we reviewed 80 clinical studies on polymorphisms in candidate genes, but those did not for the most part reveal significant associations between neurotransmitter receptor and transporter genotypes and therapy response or adverse drug reactions. In addition associations found in one study could not be replicated in other studies. For this reason, it is not yet possible to translate pharmacogenetic parameters fully into therapeutic recommendations. At present, antidepressant and antipsychotic drug responses can best be explained as the combinatorial outcome of complex systems that interact at multiple levels. In spite of these limitations, combinations of polymorphisms in pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic pathways of relevance might contribute to identify genotypes associated with best and worst responders and they may also identify susceptibility to adverse drug reactions.

Pharmacogenetics of antidepressants and antipsychotics: the contribution of allelic variations to the phenotype of drug response

The application of pharmacogenetics holds great promise for individualized therapy. However, it has little clinical reality at present, despite many claims. The main problem is that the evidence base supporting genetic testing before therapy is weak. The pharmacology of the drugs subject to inherited variability in metabolism is often complex. Few have simple or single pathways of elimination. Some have active metabolites or enantiomers with different activities and pathways of elimination. Drug dosing is likely to be influenced only if the aggregate molar activity of all active moieties at the site of action is predictably affected by genotype or phenotype. Variation in drug concentration must be significant enough to provide “signal” over and above normal variation, and there must be a genuine concentration-effect relationship. The therapeutic index of the drug will also influence test utility. After considering all of these factors, the benefits of prospective testing need to be weighed against the costs and against other endpoints of effect. It is not surprising that few drugs satisfy these requirements. Drugs (and enzymes) for which there is a reasonable evidence base supporting genotyping or phenotyping include suxamethonium/mivacurium (butyrylcholinesterase), and azathioprine/6-mercaptopurine (thiopurine methyltransferase). Drugs for which there is a potential case for prospective testing include warfarin (CYP2C9), perhexiline (CYP2D6), and perhaps the proton pump inhibitors (CYP2C19). No other drugs have an evidence base that is sufficient to justify prospective testing at present, although some warrant further evaluation. In this review we summarize the current evidence base for pharmacogenetics in relation to drug-metabolizing enzymes.

Pharmacogenetics, Drug-Metabolizing Enzymes, and Clinical Practice

Purpose. The mechanisms for drug interactions with smoking and clinically significant pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic drug interactions with smoking are reviewed.

Summary. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are some of the major lung carcinogens found in tobacco smoke. PAHs are potent inducers of the hepatic cytochrome P-450 (CYP) isoenzymes 1A1, 1A2, and, possibly, 2E1. After a person quits smoking, an important consideration is how quickly the induction of CYP1A2 dissipates. The primary pharmacokinetic interactions with smoking occur with drugs that are CYP1A2 substrates, such as caffeine, clozapine, fluvoxamine, olanzapine, tacrine, and theophylline. Inhaled insulin’s pharmacokinetic profile is significantly affected, peaking faster and reaching higher concentrations in smokers compared with nonsmokers, achieving significantly faster onset and higher insulin levels. The primary pharmacodynamic drug interactions with smoking are hormonal contraceptives and inhaled corticosteroids. The most clinically significant interaction occurs with combined hormonal contraceptives. The use of hormonal contraceptives of any kind in women who are 35 years or older and smoke 15 or more cigarettes daily is considered contraindicated because of the increased risk of serious cardiovascular adverse effects. The efficacy of inhaled corticosteroids may be reduced in patients with asthma who smoke.

Conclusion. Numerous drug interactions exist with smoking. Therefore, smokers taking a medication that interacts with smoking may require higher dosages than nonsmokers. Conversely, upon smoking cessation, smokers may require a reduction in the dosage of an interacting medication.

Drug interactions with smoking

Newer antipsychotics introduced in clinical practice in recent years include clozapine, risperidone, olanzapine, quetiapine, sertindole, ziprasidone, aripiprazole and amisulpride. These agents are subject to drug-drug interactions with other psychotropic agents or with medications used in the treatment of concomitant physical illnesses. Most pharmacokinetic interactions with newer antipsychotics occur at the metabolic level and usually involve changes in the activity of the major drug-metabolizing enzymes involved in their biotransformation, i.e. the cytochrome P450 (CYP) monooxygenases and/or uridine diphosphate-glucuronosyltransferases (UGT). Clozapine is metabolized primarily by CYP1A2, with additional contribution by other CYP isoforms. Risperidone is metabolized primarily by CYP2D6 and, to a lesser extent, CYP3A4. Olanzapine undergoes both direct conjugation and CYP1A2-mediated oxidation. Quetiapine is metabolized by CYP3A4, while sertindole and aripiprazole are metabolized by CYP2D6 and CYP3A4. Ziprasidone pathways include aldehyde oxidase-mediated reduction and CYP3A4-mediated oxidation. Amisulpride is primarily excreted in the urine and undergoes relatively little metabolism. While novel antipsychotics are unlikely to interfere with the elimination of other drugs, co-administration of inhibitors or inducers of the major enzymes responsible for their metabolism may modify their plasma concentrations, leading to potentially significant effects. Most documented metabolic interactions involve antidepressant and anti-epileptic drugs. Of a particular clinical significance is the interaction between fluvoxamine, a potent CYP1A2 inhibitor, and clozapine. Differences in the interaction potential among the novel antipsychotics currently available may be predicted based on their metabolic pathways. The clinical relevance of these interactions should be interpreted in relation to the relative width of their therapeutic index. Avoidance of unnecessary polypharmacy, knowledge of the interaction profiles of individual agents, and careful individualization of dosage based on close evaluation of clinical response and, possibly, plasma drug concentrations are essential to prevent and minimize potentially adverse drug interactions in patients receiving newer antipsychotics.

https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1111/j.1742-7843.2007.00017.x

Metabolic drug interactions with newer antipsychotics: a comparative review.

:This study investigated whether the smokinginducible cytochrome P450 (CYP) 1A2 and the polymorphic CYP2D6 play significant roles in the metabolism of olanzapine and its clinical effects at steady-state treatment. Caffeine and debrisoquine were used as measures of CYP1A2 and CYP2D6, respecti

Role of the smoking-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2 and polymorphic CYP2D6 in steady-state concentration of olanzapine.

The goal of this study was to detect genotypic differences between Spaniards and other related populations regarding CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3, and ABCB1 (MDR1) C3435T polymorphisms. DNA from 177 Spanish patients were analyzed for the presence of these mutations using PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism or direct sequencing. The observed frequencies for CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3, and C3435T alleles were within normal values in Caucasians (0.04, 0.91, and 0.5, respectively). However, 2.8% of the patients were homozygous for the wild-type CYP3A5*1 allele, an extremely uncommon genotype in other Caucasians. In addition, analysis of CYP3A4-3A5 haplotypes revealed the existence of 2 unusual subgroups: patients who were homozygous wild-type for both polymorphisms, and patients showing a CYP3A4*1A/*1B-CYP3A5*3/*3 genotype combination. The incidence of CYP3A5*1/*1 carriers and the occurrence of subjects combining the 2 above-mentioned unusual genotype combinations were more frequent in Spanish-Caucasians compared with American- or European-Caucasians. ABCB1 C3435T genotype frequencies were equally distributed between both single and combined CYP3A4 and 3A5 genotypes. These findings suggest that dose requirements for drugs metabolized by CYP3A and certain allele-disease association studies in white populations could show discrepancies in Spaniards.

Differences in CYP3A5*3 genotype distribution and combinations with other polymorphisms between Spaniards and Other Caucasian populations.

Aims

To determine the effect of gender and the genetic polymorphisms of CYP2J2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and MDR1 on the urinary excretion of the H1 antihistamine ebastine in healthy subjects.



Methods

Eighty-nine Caucasians were studied. The presence of polymorphisms in genes known to be involved in ebastine metabolism and transport (CYP2J2*2,*3,*4,*6,*7, CYP3A4*1B, CYP3A5*3, *6 and MDR1(ABCB1)C3435T) was assessed by means of PCR-restriction fragment length polymorphism and sequencing methods. Genotype was correlated with the urinary excretion of the main ebastine metabolites (desalkylebastine and carebastine) under basal conditions and after administration of grapefruit juice.



Results

Women excreted statistically greater amounts of desalkylebastine in urine (mean ± SD (95% confidence intervals, 95% CI), 23.0 ± 19.5 (18.1, 27.9) µmol) than men (12.4 ± 11.0 (7.9, 16.9)), (mean difference: 10.6 (2.4, 18.7), P < 0.005). The CYP2J2, CYP3A4 and CYP3A5 analysed polymorphisms did not greatly affect ebastine metabolite excretion. The MDR1C3435T polymorphism was found to affect both the urinary excretion of the active metabolite carebastine (32.3 ± 18.3 (23.1, 41.4), 22.8 ± 14.7 (18.6, 27.0) and 21.5 ± 15.3 (14.7, 28.3) for CC, CT and TT carriers, respectively; P < 0.05) and the grapefruit juice-induced inhibition of its transport/formation (mean fold-decrease ± SD (95% CI), 1.5 ± 0.8 (1.0, 2.0), 1.1 ± 0.9 (0.7, 1.4) and 0.9 ± 0.4 (0.6, 1.2) for CC, CT and TT carriers, respectively; P = 0.01).



Conclusions

Gender and the presence of the MDR1C3435T polymorphism both influence the excretion of ebastine metabolites in urine.

/pdf/the-effect-of-cyp2j2-cyp3a4-cyp3a5-and-the-mdr1-c3435t-4tsod2uq0r.pdf

The effect of CYP2J2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and the MDR1 C3435T polymorphisms and gender on the urinary excretion of the metabolites of the H1-receptor antihistamine ebastine: a pilot study

The thienobenzodiazepine derivative olanzapine (OLZ) is a commonly used antipsychotic drug that has demonstrated efficacy against both positive and negative symptoms of schizophrenia (1).

OLZ shows variable pharmacokinetics, with induction of the CYP1A2 enzyme by cigarette smoking being one of the most important factors contributing to this variability (2). Moreover, because of the potential toxicity of OLZ at relatively low concentrations, monitoring of OLZ has been suggested to be necessary (3).

Several methods have been developed to measure OLZ in whole blood, plasma, or serum, including HPLC-based techniques (4)(5)(6)(7)(8)(9)(10), liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS) (11)(12)(13), and gas chromatography coupled with MS (14).

The goal of this work was to develop a rapid and technically simple assay based on LC coupled with electrospray MS that would be capable of routinely determining extremely low OLZ concentrations. This could be very useful for monitoring schizophrenic patients who are heavy smokers, a group that accounts for 70–90% of these patients (15), who are more likely to display lower OLZ concentrations than nonsmokers (2)(16).

The chromatographic system used consisted of a Hewlett-Packard (HP) 1100 series equipment (Agilent Technologies Spain S.L.) with a degasser (Model G1322A), quaternary pump (Model G1311A), autosampler (Model G1313A), ultraviolet/visible detector (Model G1315A) set at 260 nm wavelength, and a quadrupole mass spectrometer (model G1946A). A computer-assisted HP G2710AA LC/MS ChemStation (Agilent Technologies Spain S.L.) was used to operate the modules and facilitate data management.

Blood samples were collected in tubes containing EDTA, and plasma was immediately separated after centrifugation and stored frozen at −20 °C until assayed. To avoid OLZ oxidation during storage and manipulation (6), we added 5 μL of a 250 g/L ascorbic acid …

/pdf/applicability-of-an-assay-for-routine-monitoring-of-highly-4rsb4hwqla.pdf

Sonia Vizcaino

Papers

Role of the smoking-induced cytochrome P450 (CYP)1A2 and polymorphic CYP2D6 in steady-state concentration of olanzapine.

Differences in CYP3A5*3 genotype distribution and combinations with other polymorphisms between Spaniards and Other Caucasian populations.

The effect of CYP2J2, CYP3A4, CYP3A5 and the MDR1 C3435T polymorphisms and gender on the urinary excretion of the metabolites of the H1-receptor antihistamine ebastine: a pilot study

Applicability of an Assay for Routine Monitoring of Highly Variable Concentrations of Olanzapine Based on HPLC with Mass Spectrometric Detection