S
Stav Fainshmidt
Researcher at Florida International University
Publications - 53
Citations - 2644
Stav Fainshmidt is an academic researcher from Florida International University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Dynamic capabilities & Corporate governance. The author has an hindex of 21, co-authored 48 publications receiving 1602 citations. Previous affiliations of Stav Fainshmidt include State University System of Florida & Old Dominion University.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Psychological Safety: A Meta-Analytic Review and Extension
TL;DR: The authors conducted a comprehensive meta-analysis on the antecedents and outcomes of psychological safety in the workplace and examined the extent to which psychological safety influences both task performance and organizational citizenship behaviors over and beyond related concepts such as positive leader relations and work engagement.
Journal ArticleDOI
Dynamic Capabilities and Organizational Performance: A Meta‐Analytic Evaluation and Extension
TL;DR: Findings illustrate how the nature of the dynamic capability and the economic context in which it is utilized shape its value, thus offering a more nuanced conceptualization of theynamic capabilities-performance relationship.
Journal ArticleDOI
Varieties of institutional systems: A contextual taxonomy of understudied countries
TL;DR: In this paper, a new theoretical framework is proposed to capture the diverse and unique institutional context of understudied economies in Africa, Middle East, East Europe, Latin America, and Asia.
Journal ArticleDOI
The contributions of qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) to international business research
Stav Fainshmidt,Michael A. Witt,Ruth V. Aguilera,Ruth V. Aguilera,Alain Verbeke,Alain Verbeke,Alain Verbeke +6 more
TL;DR: In this article, the authors introduce IB scholars to contemporary configurational thinking and its analytical tool, fuzzy-set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA), and present a wide range of IB phenomena where it could be usefully applied.
Journal ArticleDOI
An empirical assessment of the dynamic capabilities–performance relationship
TL;DR: This study takes stock of the empirical DC literature by conducting a systematic, vote-count assessment of the level of empirical support for the DC view, which shows that theDC view received 60% support in empirical testing, which is higher than a previous, similar examination of the resource-based view.