scispace - formally typeset
S

Stephanie T. Solansky

Researcher at Texas State University

Publications -  24
Citations -  1387

Stephanie T. Solansky is an academic researcher from Texas State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Shared leadership & Leadership style. The author has an hindex of 11, co-authored 22 publications receiving 1237 citations. Previous affiliations of Stephanie T. Solansky include University of Houston–Victoria & University of Houston.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Radical change accidentally: the emergence and amplification of small change

TL;DR: In this paper, a decision to offer breakfast to homeless people led to radical change in a church and its environment, and the dynamic interaction of amplifying actions, contextual conditions, and small changes led to continuous radical change.
Journal ArticleDOI

The role of leadership in emergent, self-organization

TL;DR: In this paper, the role of leadership in complex systems is investigated and it is shown that as enablers, leaders disrupt existing patterns of behavior, encourage novelty, and make sense of emerging events for others.
Journal ArticleDOI

The evaluation of two key leadership development program components: Leadership skills assessment and leadership mentoring

TL;DR: In this article, the authors evaluated two key components in leadership development programs: a 360-degree assessment of leadership skills and leadership mentoring and found that mentees open up when mentors focus more on coaching and less on compliance and when mentors initiate personal contact with the mentees more often.
Journal ArticleDOI

Leadership Style and Team Processes in Self-Managed Teams:

TL;DR: In this paper, team processes are explored within self-managed teams that develop and perform team leadership in a self-managing environment, where leaders have an impact on how the team develops and performs.
Journal ArticleDOI

Team identification: a determining factor of performance

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explored why some teams realize performance gains and others do not, and proposed team identification as an explanatory mechanism of performance, and empirically provided evidence that team identification is linked to team performance across three settings.