scispace - formally typeset
S

Stephen A.W. Drew

Researcher at Florida Gulf Coast University

Publications -  6
Citations -  250

Stephen A.W. Drew is an academic researcher from Florida Gulf Coast University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Strategic planning & Strategic management. The author has an hindex of 5, co-authored 6 publications receiving 222 citations.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

Building technology foresight: using scenarios to embrace innovation

TL;DR: The application of scenario planning methods to identifying disruptive innovations at an early stage, mapping out potential development paths for such innovations, and building appropriate organizational capabilities are described.
Journal ArticleDOI

Foreign Investment and Ethics: How to Contribute to Social Responsibility by Doing Business in Less-Developed Countries.

TL;DR: In this paper, the authors explore the evidence to support the proposition that FDI and international business improve social conditions in less-developed countries, and how these improvements are linked to strategies of corporate social responsibility (CSR) and ethical business practice.
Journal ArticleDOI

Engaging Boards in Corporate Direction-Setting: Strategic Scorecards

TL;DR: In this article, the authors discuss how boards can contribute to strategic conversations and share responsibilities for strategic management with the CEO and top teams, and suggest that boards adopt a strategic scorecard as implemented by CIMA1 to engage in strategy.
Journal ArticleDOI

Team Culture and Business Strategy Simulation Performance

TL;DR: The findings of a multiyear study are reported that uncovered a clear link between specific team cultural values, as measured by the Competing Values Framework, and simulation performance and how these findings may influence the pedagogical use of simulations in the strategy classroom.
Journal ArticleDOI

Application of a Learning Management System for Knowledge Management: Adoption and Cross-cultural Factors

TL;DR: The results indicated very favorable acceptance and use of the LMS for sales team training and support and the relationship between perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness was moderated by whether users were located in the head offices or in various international locations.