scispace - formally typeset
S

Stephen Bax

Researcher at University of Bedfordshire

Publications -  32
Citations -  1983

Stephen Bax is an academic researcher from University of Bedfordshire. The author has contributed to research in topics: Language assessment & Test (assessment). The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 32 publications receiving 1797 citations. Previous affiliations of Stephen Bax include University of Oxford & Canterbury Christ Church University.

Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI

CALL—past, present and future

TL;DR: In this paper, a critical examination and reassessment of the history of CALL is presented, and three new categories (restricted, open and integrated CALL) are proposed: Restricted, Open and Integrated CALL.
Journal ArticleDOI

The end of CLT: a context approach to language teaching

Stephen Bax
- 01 Jul 2003 - 
TL;DR: The authors argue that the dominance of CLT has led to the neglect of one crucial aspect of language pedagogy, namely the context in which that teaching takes place, and argue that it is time to replace CLT as the central paradigm in language teaching with a Context Approach which places context at the heart of the profession.
Journal ArticleDOI

Normalisation Revisited: The Effective Use of Technology in Language Education

TL;DR: The issue of the normalisation of technology in language education is revisited and normalisation in the light of a neo-Vygotskian conceptual framework is examined, with proposals for how to introduce new technologies into language education settings with maximum impact.
Journal ArticleDOI

Making CALL work: Towards normalisation

TL;DR: A qualitative research study into two EFL settings is drawn on to discuss obstacles to normalisation and ways of overcoming them, and identifies a number of key features which appear to be significant in achieving normalisation.
Journal ArticleDOI

The cognitive processing of candidates during reading tests: Evidence from eye-tracking

TL;DR: Khalifa et al. as mentioned in this paper investigated test takers' cognitive processing while completing on-screen IELTS reading test items, and found significant differences between successful and unsuccessful readers on a number of dimensions, including their ability to read expeditiously and their focus on particular aspects of the test items and texts.