S
Stephen Honeybul
Researcher at Royal Perth Hospital
Publications - 21
Citations - 340
Stephen Honeybul is an academic researcher from Royal Perth Hospital. The author has contributed to research in topics: Decompressive craniectomy & Traumatic brain injury. The author has an hindex of 7, co-authored 21 publications receiving 238 citations. Previous affiliations of Stephen Honeybul include Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital & University of Western Australia.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
A multicenter trial of vena cava filters in severely injured patients
Kwok M. Ho,Sudhakar Rao,Stephen Honeybul,Stephen Honeybul,René Zellweger,Bradley Wibrow,Jeffrey Lipman,Anthony Holley,Alan Kop,Elizabeth Geelhoed,Tomas Corcoran,Philip Misur,Cyrus Edibam,Ross I. Baker,Jenny Chamberlain,Claire Forsdyke,Frederick B. Rogers +16 more
TL;DR: Early prophylactic placement of a vena cava filter after major trauma did not result in a lower incidence of symptomatic pulmonary embolism or death at 90 days than no placing of a filter.
Journal ArticleDOI
How "successful" is calvarial reconstruction using frozen autologous bone?
Stephen Honeybul,Kwok M. Ho +1 more
TL;DR: This study has demonstrated that the use of frozen autologous bone is associated with a high long-term failure rate; however, this does not necessarily imply that alternative materials should be routinely used.
Journal ArticleDOI
Neurotrauma and the RUB: where tragedy meets ethics and science
TL;DR: By using predicted and observed outcome data this paper considers the ethical implications in three cases of differing severity of head injury in view of the fact that it is possible to calculate the RUB for each case.
Journal ArticleDOI
A randomised controlled trial comparing autologous cranioplasty with custom-made titanium cranioplasty: long-term follow-up.
Stephen Honeybul,Stephen Honeybul,David Anthony Morrison,Kwok M. Ho,Kwok M. Ho,Christopher Lind,Christopher Lind,Elizabeth Geelhoed +7 more
TL;DR: Use of primary titanium cranioplasty after decompressive craniectomy reduced the number of reoperations needed and the associated long-term total hospital costs.
Journal ArticleDOI
Predicting long-term neurological outcomes after severe traumatic brain injury requiring decompressive craniectomy: A comparison of the CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models.
TL;DR: Both CRASH and IMPACT prognostic models were good in discriminating between favourable and unfavourable long-term neurological outcome for patients with severe TBI requiring decompressive craniectomy, but the calibration of the IMPACT full-model was better than the CRASH model.