S
Stephen L. Payne
Researcher at Eastern Illinois University
Publications - 16
Citations - 326
Stephen L. Payne is an academic researcher from Eastern Illinois University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Business ethics & Business analysis. The author has an hindex of 9, co-authored 16 publications receiving 318 citations. Previous affiliations of Stephen L. Payne include University of Richmond.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
Social Accounts and Metaphors about Cheating
Stephen L. Payne,Karen S. Nantz +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, social accounts and metaphorical metaphors about cheating college teaching are discussed. But they focus on cheating college teachers and not cheating college students themselves, rather than cheating students.
Journal ArticleDOI
Social Psychological Approaches to the Perception of Ethical Dilemmas
TL;DR: In this article, moral psychology and social psychology theories are examined to illustrate their usefulness for evolving research on topics of business and organizational ethics, and the authors believe that social psychological concepts such as attribution, cognitive distortion, and impression management can contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of processes of moral perception and judgment.
Journal ArticleDOI
New Directions for the Business Curriculum.
TL;DR: In this article, the authors analyze the current state of the business curriculum and offer recommendations for a cross-functional curriculum that provides the foundation students need for career success, and propose a crossfunctional curriculum to provide the foundation for success.
Journal ArticleDOI
Capstone Business Course Assessment: Exploring Student Readiness Perspectives
TL;DR: The authors recommend forms of feed-forward controls, concurrent controls, and feedback controls for capstone courses to enable business educators to assess student learning from a more systemic perspective.
Journal ArticleDOI
Endorsement of managers following accusations of breaches in confidentiality
TL;DR: In this paper, two related studies focused on the effects that a questionable supervisory conduct has on the endorsement and vulnerability of the supervisor, as well as on judgments of supervisory morality.