S
Steven P. Cassou
Researcher at Kansas State University
Publications - 51
Citations - 888
Steven P. Cassou is an academic researcher from Kansas State University. The author has contributed to research in topics: Fiscal policy & Endogenous growth theory. The author has an hindex of 15, co-authored 51 publications receiving 836 citations. Previous affiliations of Steven P. Cassou include Fairfield University & State University of New York System.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The link between tax rates and foreign direct investment
TL;DR: In this article, the authors investigated the impact of tax policy on foreign direct investment flows between the US and other countries using a panel data empirical approach and found that the host and home country income tax rates are significant factors influencing the transfer of funds component of FDI.
Journal ArticleDOI
A normative analysis of public capital
Chunrong Ai,Steven P. Cassou +1 more
TL;DR: In this paper, a normative analysis of short-term public capital investment is carried out using cost benefit analysis, which explicitly incorporates the durability of capital into the computation and thus include an aspect of public capital omitted from previous studies which focus on productivity.
Journal ArticleDOI
Optimal fiscal policy, public capital, and the productivity slowdown
TL;DR: This paper developed a quantitative theoretical model for the optimal provision of public capital and showed that the ratio of public to private capital in the US economy since 1925 evolves in a manner that is broadly consistent with an optimal transition path derived from a simple growth model.
Journal ArticleDOI
Growth Effects of Shifting from a Graduated‐rate Tax System to a Flat Tax
TL;DR: In this article, the authors developed a quantitative general equilibrium model to assess the growth effects of adopting a flat tax plan similar to the one proposed by Hall and Rabushka (1995).
Journal ArticleDOI
Health Plan Choice and the Utilization of Health Care Services
TL;DR: After controlling for chronic illness and other observed variables, the authors find no evidence of further selectivity bias in equations for physician contacts and inpatient days.