scispace - formally typeset
Search or ask a question

Showing papers by "Steven S. Coughlin published in 2022"


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors examined cardiovascular conditions and obesity among 1824 gynecologic cancer survivors in a cross-sectional analysis, using data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (BRFSS).

3 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors examined geographic and racial variation in cancer mortality within the state of Georgia, and investigated the correlation between the observed spatial differences and county-level characteristics, and identified hot spot counties based on cancer mortality rates overall and stratified by non-Hispanic white (NH-white) and NH-black race/ethnicity.
Abstract: Abstract We examined geographic and racial variation in cancer mortality within the state of Georgia, and investigated the correlation between the observed spatial differences and county-level characteristics. We analyzed county-level cancer mortality data collected by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer mortality among adults (aged ≥ 18 years) in 159 Georgia counties from years 1999 through 2019. Geospatial methods were applied, and we identified hot spot counties based on cancer mortality rates overall and stratified by non-Hispanic white (NH-white) and NH-black race/ethnicity. Among all adults, 5.0% (8 of 159), 8.2% (13 of 159), 5.0% (8 of 159), and 6.9% (11 of 159) of Georgia counties were estimated hot spots for breast cancer, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer mortality, respectively. Cancer mortality hot spots were heavily concentrated in three major areas: (1) eastern Piedmont to Coastal Plain regions, (2) southwestern rural Georgia area, or (3) northern-most rural Georgia. Overall, hot spot counties generally had higher proportion of NH-black adults, older adult population, greater poverty, and more rurality. In Georgia, targeted cancer prevention strategies and allocation of health resources are needed in counties with elevated cancer mortality rates, focusing on interventions suitable for NH-black race/ethnicity, low-income, and rural residents.

2 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the cumulative burden of chronic stress and life events can be measured using allostatic load (AL) and the effect of AL changes over time on MACE development was calculated via piecewise Cox regression.
Abstract: Abstract Background Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death in men with prostate cancer (PC). Accumulated stress plays an important role in CVD development. The cumulative burden of chronic stress and life events can be measured using allostatic load (AL). Methods The initial cohort included males aged 18 years and older diagnosed with PC (2005-2019). AL was modeled as an ordinal variable (0-11). Fine-Gray competing risk regressions measured the impact of precancer diagnosis AL and postdiagnosis AL in 2-year major cardiac events (MACE). The effect of AL changes over time on MACE development was calculated via piecewise Cox regression (before, and 2 months, 6 months, and 1 year after PC diagnosis). Results We included 5261 PC patients of which 6.6% had a 2-year MACE. For every 1-point increase in AL before and within 60 days after PC diagnosis, the risk of MACE increased 25% (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR] =1.25, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.18 to 1.33) and 27% (aHR = 1.27, 95% CI = 1.20 to 1.35), respectively. Using AL as a time-varying exposure, the risk of MACE increased 19% (aHR = 1.19, 95% CI = 1.11 to 1.27), 22% (aHR = 1.22, 95% CI = 1.14 to 1.33), 28% (aHR = 1.28, 95% CI = 1.23 to 1.33), and 31% (aHR = 1.31, 95% CI = 1.27 to 1.35) for every 1-point increase in AL before, 2 months after, 6 months after, and 1 year after PC diagnosis, respectively. Conclusion AL and its changes over time are associated with MACE in PC patients, suggesting a role of a biological measure of stress as a marker of CVD risk among men with PC.

1 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
04 Mar 2022-Medicine
TL;DR: It was found that about 16% of cancer survivors had low health literacy, and the prevalence was higher among Hispanic and Black individuals, and among those with poor health status, low income and educational attainment.

1 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , the authors examined CV conditions and risk factors in cancer survivors in a cross-sectional analysis, using data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System and found that cancer survivors are more likely than participants without a cancer history to have multiple risk factors that increase their risk for cardiovascular disease and other chronic illnesses, including cigarette smoking, physical inactivity, and obesity.
Abstract: With increasing prevalence, there is a growing population living with cardiovascular (CV) disease and cancer who are concurrently or at risk for developing these 2 disease states. We examined CV conditions and CV risk factors in cancer survivors in a cross-sectional analysis, using data from the 2019 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. Cancer survivors are more likely than participants without a cancer history to have multiple risk factors that increase their risk for CV disease and other chronic illnesses, including cigarette smoking, physical inactivity, and obesity. In contrast, cancer survivors are less likely to be heavy drinkers or to not consume fruits and vegetables. The odds of having a heart attack, coronary heart disease (CHD), diabetes, and hypertension were generally higher among cancer survivors. In multivariable analysis, the adjusted odds of having a heart attack, CHD, diabetes, hypertension, or high cholesterol were higher among cancer survivors than among participants without a history of cancer. Although the odds of obesity and physical inactivity were generally higher among cancer survivors across all socioeconomic status groups, the odds of having a heart attack or CHD were particularly high among Black and Hispanic cancer survivors and among younger participants. The odds of having diabetes were also higher among Black and Hispanic cancer survivors. In conclusion, cancer survivors are more likely than participants without a cancer history to have multiple risk factors that increase their risk of CV disease and other chronic illnesses, and they have a higher prevalence of heart attack, CHD, diabetes, and hypertension. Of particular concern are the higher prevalence of heart attack, CHD, and diabetes among Black and Hispanic cancer survivors.

1 citations


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this paper , preventive behaviors among hematologic cancer survivors in a cross-sectional analysis, using data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, were examined, and no statistically significant differences in the frequency of current smoking, heavy drinking, and physical activity were observed across these 2 groups.
Abstract: Maintaining a healthy lifestyle is an important factor in promoting positive outcomes for cancer survivors. Health behaviors, such as engaging in physical activity, not consuming large amounts of alcohol, abstaining from cigarette smoking, receiving routine immunizations, and undergoing recommended cancer screening tests, may lead to improved physical health, health status, and quality of life.We examined preventive behaviors among hematologic cancer survivors in a cross-sectional analysis, using data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System.Adherence to cancer screening test and immunization recommendations among hematologic cancer survivors compares favorably with that among persons with no history of cancer. However, no statistically significant differences in the frequency of current smoking, heavy drinking, and physical activity were observed across these 2 groups. No important differences were observed in health behaviors between male and female cancer survivors, except that female hematologic cancer survivors were more likely to adhere to influenza and pneumococcal pneumonia immunization recommendations than female survivors of other types of cancer, whereas no such differences were found among their male counterparts.Although hematologic cancer survivors were more adherent to preventive health behaviors such as cancer screening and immunization, they were not different from persons without any history of cancer in exhibiting behavioral risk factors such as smoking and heavy drinking. Intervention studies are needed to identify effective ways to assist hematologic cancer survivors to quit smoking and refrain from hazardous alcohol consumption.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Though the overall prevalence of financial hardship was reduced from 22 to 18%, a considerable disparity between Black and Hispanic, and White CVD patients persisted from pre-ACA to post-ACA periods, suggesting further initiatives are needed to reduce inequities across racial and ethnic minorities.


Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: Overall, hot spot counties generally had higher proportion of NH-Blacks, older adult population, greater poverty, and more rurality, and targeted cancer prevention strategies and allocation of health resources are needed in counties with elevated cancer mortality rates.
Abstract: Purpose of the study: Progress in cancer outcomes in the general population are not equitable among all populations, leaving some, such as rural and non-Hispanic Blacks (NH-Black) behind. We examined geographic and racial variation in cancer mortality in the state of Georgia, and investigated the correlation between the observed spatial differences and county-level characteristics. Methods: We analyzed data on breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer mortality among adults (aged >18 years) in 159 Georgia counties from years 1999 through 2019. Geospatial methods were applied, and we identified hot spot counties based on cancer mortality rates overall and stratified by non-Hispanic White (NH-White) and NH-Black races. We assessed differences in county-level characteristics between hot spot and non-hot spot counties using Wilcoxon rank-sum test and Spearman correlation and stratified all analyses by race/ethnicity. Results: Among all adults, 5.0% (8 of 159), 8.2% (13 of 159), 5.0% (8 of 159), and 6.9% (11 of 159) of Georgia counties were estimated hot spots for breast cancer, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer mortality, respectively. Among NH-Whites, 5.7% (9 of 159), 4.4% (7 of 159), 4.4% (7 of 159) counties, and 5.0% (8 of 159) of counties were identified as hot spots for breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer mortality, respectively. Among NH-Blacks, 5.7% (9 of 159), 3.8% (6 of 159), 7.4% (11 of 159), and 5.7% (9 of 159) counties were identified as hot spots for breast, colorectal, lung, prostate cancer mortality, respectively. Cancer mortality hot spots were heavily concentrated in three major areas: 1) eastern Piedmont to Coastal Plain regions, 2) southwestern rural Georgia area, or 3) northern-most rural Georgia. Overall, hot spot counties generally had higher proportion of NH-Blacks, older adult population, greater poverty, and more rurality. Conclusions: We observed distinct geographic and racial/ethnic disparities in mortality from breast, colorectal, lung, and prostate cancer in Georgia. Targeted cancer prevention strategies and allocation of health resources are needed in counties with elevated cancer mortality rates, focusing on interventions suitable for NH-Black, low-income, and rural residents. Citation Format: Justin Xavier Moore, Martha S. Tingen, Steven S. Coughlin, Christine O'Meara, Lorriane Odhiambo, Marlo Vernon, Samantha Jones, Robert Petcu, Ryan Johnson, K.M. Monirul Islam, Darryl Nettles, Ghadeer Albashir, Jorge Cortes. Understanding geographic and racial disparities in mortality from four major cancers in the state of Georgia: A spatial epidemiologic analysis, 1999 - 2019 [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 5908.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: In this article , a survey of 239 women veterans from northeastern and southern U.S. states found that women GWVs experienced adverse reproductive outcomes: 25% had difficulty conceiving, and 31% had a pregnancy that ended in a miscarriage or stillbirth.
Abstract: Reproductive outcomes, such as preterm birth, miscarriage/stillbirth, and pre-eclampsia, are understudied in veterans, particularly among Gulf War veterans (GWVs). During deployment, women GWVs were exposed to toxicant and nontoxicant exposures that may be associated with adverse reproductive and developmental outcomes. The data come from a survey of 239 participants from northeastern and southern U.S. cohorts of women veterans. The questionnaire collected information about the service history, current and past general health, reproductive and family health, demographic information, and deployment exposures. Odds ratios were computed with 95% confidence intervals between exposures in theater and reproductive/children’s health outcomes. GWVs experienced adverse reproductive outcomes: 25% had difficulty conceiving, and 31% had a pregnancy that ended in a miscarriage or stillbirth. Pregnancy complications were common among GWVs: 23% had a high-risk pregnancy, and 16% were diagnosed with pre-eclampsia. About a third of GWVs reported their children (38%) had a developmental disorder. Use of pesticide cream during deployment was associated with higher odds of all reproductive and developmental outcomes. The results demonstrate that GWVs experienced reproductive and children’s health outcomes at potentially high rates, and exploratory analyses suggest pesticide exposure as associated with higher odds of adverse reproductive outcomes. Future longitudinal studies of women veterans should prioritize examining reproductive and children’s health outcomes.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR: The CHANGE project will develop a health disparities and culturally competent cancer care e-Learning curriculum for health care professionals, hematology-oncology fellows, residents, and medical students at the Medical College of Georgia, and provide a comprehensive approach to provider education that will begin to improve patient care satisfaction and health outcomes.
Abstract: INTRODUCTION. Incidence and mortality rates for breast, prostate, and colorectal cancers all exceed national rates in Georgia and are higher among African Americans (AAs). Ensuring culturally competent and equitable health care delivery relies on creating an educated and engaged health care team. Patient stories are powerful examples of community-learned experiences and can be used to educate better providers and health care students who serve diverse populations, particularly when communicating risk and prevention of cancer. The goal of the CHANGE project is to provide a sustainable model of evidence-based cancer awareness through education - with an emphasis on prevention and early detection behaviors. We will develop a health disparities and culturally competent cancer care e-Learning curriculum for health care professionals, hematology-oncology fellows, residents, and medical students at the Medical College of Georgia. METHODS. Thirty community members and stakeholders (93% AA, 76% female, all adults) were recruited through public housing, healthcare clinics and providers, and community organizations. Vignettes describing patient access and care interactions were used in semi-structured interviews to guide conversations about experiences accessing care, attitudes towards cancer prevention, and community cancer beliefs. Interviews were recorded, professionally transcribed, and content analyzed using NVivo 12.0 by two independent raters. RESULTS. Three common themes emerged: accessibility of healthcare (transportation, finances, and difficulties in scheduling were primary barriers); cancer myths and cultural norms (no interpersonal discussion of cancer, seen as “taboo,” cancer will spread if cut into and cancer is contagious); and experience of racial bias in health care (historical racial bias and systemic racism; receipt of treatment and care perceived to be different due to race; lack of AA providers). CONCLUSION. This sample adequately represented those most at risk for cancer in Augusta, GA area. Their shared experiences will be used to design and inform an e-learning curriculum, in conjunction with education on health disparities across the state and specific to the local community. This will provide a comprehensive approach to provider education that will begin to improve patient care satisfaction and health outcomes. Citation Format: Marlo M. Vernon, Samantha Jones, Justin X. Moore, Steve S. Coughlin, Vahe Heboyan, Shakirah Clarke, Barbara Idun, Martha S. Tingen. Cancer health awareness through screening and education (CHANGE): Understanding community experience accessing cancer care [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2022; 2022 Apr 8-13. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2022;82(12_Suppl):Abstract nr 1020.

Journal ArticleDOI
TL;DR:
Abstract: PURPOSE: There has been increasing concern over the high cost of oncology care and its long-lasting impact on the well-being of cancer survivors. METHODS: We examined characteristics of impoverished cancer survivors in the United States, including their physical and mental health, using data from the 2020 Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System. We used binomial logistic regressions for binary outcome variables, and negative binomial regressions for count variables, to estimate the odds ratios (ORs) and incident rate ratios (IRRs) of the physical, mental, and socioeconomic-related health factors for low-income cancer survivors versus higher-income survivors. We compared the ORs and IRRs for low-income cancer survivors with those of higher income cancer survivors. RESULTS: There was a two-fold increased odds (adjusted OR, 2.33; 95% CI, 1.86 to 2.91) of having fair/poor health for low-income cancer survivors compared with higher-income cancer survivors. There was an almost two-fold increased odds (adjusted OR, 1.97; 95% CI, 1.50 to 2.59) of not being able to see a doctor among low-income cancer survivors, and a 42% lower odds (adjusted OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39 to 0.86) of having health insurance coverage for low-income cancer survivors compared with higher-income survivors. Incidence rate ratios for physical (IRR, 1.52; 95% CI, 1.31 to 1.75) and mental (IRR, 1.53; 95% CI, 1.26 to 1.86) unhealthy days were significantly higher among low-income cancer survivors compared with nonpoor cancer survivors. CONCLUSION: Strategies are available to ameliorate financial hardship at multiple levels. Implementation of these strategies is urgently needed.