S
Susan M. Broniarczyk
Researcher at University of Texas at Austin
Publications - 47
Citations - 4296
Susan M. Broniarczyk is an academic researcher from University of Texas at Austin. The author has contributed to research in topics: Brand equity & Context (language use). The author has an hindex of 28, co-authored 45 publications receiving 4053 citations. Previous affiliations of Susan M. Broniarczyk include College of Business Administration.
Papers
More filters
Journal ArticleDOI
The Importance of the Brand in Brand Extension
TL;DR: In this article, the authors identified two factors that influence consumer perceptions of a brand extension: brand affect and the similarity between the original and extension product categories, and found that these two factors are correlated.
Journal ArticleDOI
Consumers’ Perceptions of the Assortment Offered in a Grocery Category: The Impact of Item Reduction:
TL;DR: Grocery retailers have been informed that, to remain competitive, they must reduce the number of stockkeeping units (SKUs) offered, in line with consumer demand, or, in other words, adopt “Efficien...
Journal ArticleDOI
The Role of Consumers' Intuitions in Inference Making
TL;DR: The authors show that intuitive beliefs about the relationships between attributes are perceived as a particularly reliable basis for interattribute inference, and that strong beliefs appear capable of superseding other compelling cues and may induce consumers to generate inferences spontaneously.
Journal ArticleDOI
The Influence of Prior Beliefs, Frequency Cues, and Magnitude Cues on Consumers' Perceptions of Comparative Price Data
TL;DR: In this paper, the authors manipulated prior beliefs and two data-based cues to determine their relative influence on consumer price perceptions, and found that prior beliefs affected price perceptions but that the frequency cue exerted a dominating influence.
Journal ArticleDOI
Integrating Multiple Opinions: The Role of Aspiration Level on Consumer Response to Critic Consensus
TL;DR: In this article, a reference-dependent model was proposed such that consumer response to consensus depends on whether the average critic rating for an alternative is above or below an aspiration level, and consumers exhibited a tendency to prefer critic disagreement for high priced products or decisions associated with high social risk because most alternatives fell below their high aspiration levels.