Arsenic removal from water/wastewater using adsorbents—A critical review

1: Magnetic Particles: Preparation, Properties and Applications: M. Ozaki. 2: Maghemite (gamma-Fe2O3): A Versatile Magnetic Colloidal Material C.J. Serna, M.P. Morales. 3: Dynamics of Adsorption and Oxidation of Organic Molecules on Illuminated Titanium Dioxide Particles Immersed in Water M.A. Blesa, R.J. Candal, S.A. Bilmes. 4: Colloidal Aggregation in Two-Dimensions A. Moncho-Jorda, F. Martinez-Lopez, M.A. Cabrerizo-Vilchez, R. Hidalgo Alvarez, M. Quesada-PMerez. 5: Kinetics of Particle and Protein Adsorption Z. Adamczyk.

Surface and Colloid Science

New generation adsorbents for water treatment.

The contamination of ground waters, abstracted for drinking and irrigation, by sediment-derived arsenic threatens the health of tens of millions of people worldwide, most notably in Bangladesh and West Bengal1,2,3. Despite the calamitous effects on human health arising from the extensive use of arsenic-enriched ground waters in these regions, the mechanisms of arsenic release from sediments remain poorly characterized and are topics of intense international debate4,5,6,7,8. We use a microscosm-based approach to investigate these mechanisms: techniques of microbiology and molecular ecology are used in combination with aqueous and solid phase speciation analysis of arsenic. Here we show that anaerobic metal-reducing bacteria can play a key role in the mobilization of arsenic in sediments collected from a contaminated aquifer in West Bengal. We also show that, for the sediments in this study, arsenic release took place after Fe(iii) reduction, rather than occurring simultaneously. Identification of the critical factors controlling the biogeochemical cycling of arsenic is one important contribution to fully informing the development of effective strategies to manage these and other similar arsenic-rich ground waters worldwide.

Role of metal-reducing bacteria in arsenic release from Bengal delta sediments

Nanoscale zero-valent iron (NZVI) was synthesized and tested for the removal of As(III), which is a highly toxic, mobile, and predominant arsenic species in anoxic groundwater. We used SEM-EDX, AFM, and XRD to characterize particle size, surface morphology, and corrosion layers formed on pristine NZVI and As(III)-treated NZVI. AFM results showed that particle size ranged from 1 to 120 nm. XRD and SEM results revealed that NZVI gradually converted to magnetite/maghemite corrosion products mixed with lepidocrocite over 60 d. Arsenic(III) adsorption kinetics were rapid and occurred on a scale of minutes following a pseudo-first-order rate expression with observed reaction rate constants (kobs) of 0.07−1.3 min-1 (at varied NZVI concentration). These values are about 1000× higher than kobs literature values for As(III) adsorption on micron size ZVI. Batch experiments were performed to determine the feasibility of NZVI as an adsorbent for As(III) treatment in groundwater as affected by initial As(III) concentra...

Removal of Arsenic(III) from Groundwater by Nanoscale Zero-Valent Iron

Arsenic derived from natural sources occurs in groundwater in many countries, affecting the health of millions of people. The combined effects of As(V) reduction and diagenesis of iron oxide minerals on arsenic mobility are investigated in this study by comparing As(V) and As(III) sorption onto amorphous iron oxide (HFO), goethite, and magnetite at varying solution compositions. Experimental data are modeled with a diffuse double layer surface complexation model, and the extracted model parameters are used to examine the consistency of our results with those previously reported. Sorption of As(V) onto HFO and goethite is more favorable than that of As(III) below pH 5−6, whereas, above pH 7−8, As(III) has a higher affinity for the solids. The pH at which As(V) and As(III) are equally sorbed depends on the solid-to-solution ratio and type and specific surface area of the minerals and is shifted to lower pH values in the presence of phosphate, which competes for sorption sites. The sorption data indicate tha...

Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility.

Processes controlling solubility of biogenic silica and pore water build-up of silicic acid in marine sediments

[1] On average, 50-60% of diatomaceous opal produced in the euphotic zone redissolves within the upper 100 m of the water column. High specific silica dissolution rates in the surface ocean contrast with order-of-magnitude lower values in deep-sea sediments. The lack of a mechanistic understanding of these large variations in dissolution kinetics is a major source of uncertainty in models of nutrient silicon cycling in the oceans. Here we show that the observed variability in biogenic silica reactivity is consistent with results of experimental dissolution studies. Differences in aluminum content and specific surface area of the diatom skeletons, plus differences in temperature and degree of undersaturation, all contribute to lowering silica dissolution rates in deep-sea sediments relative to the euphotic zone. When variations in these material and environmental properties are accounted for, the predicted specific opal dissolution rate in average surface ocean water is over 2 orders of magnitude faster than the rate measured in recently deposited biosiliceous oozes of the Southern Ocean. The predicted specific dissolution rate, however, is approximately 5 times higher than the value obtained from global estimates of the depth-integrated dissolution rate and biogenic silica concentration in the upper water column. This discrepancy likely reflects the inhibitory effect of protective organic coatings on fresh diatom shells in surface waters. The experimental data further imply that aluminum incorporation in the silica matrix, during biomineralization or after death of the organisms, enhances the preservation efficiency of biogenic opal in marine sediments.

https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdf/10.1029/2001GB001431

Suvasis Dixit

Papers

Comparison of arsenic(V) and arsenic(III) sorption onto iron oxide minerals: implications for arsenic mobility.

Processes controlling solubility of biogenic silica and pore water build-up of silicic acid in marine sediments

Biogenic silica dissolution in the oceans: Reconciling experimental and field‐based dissolution rates

Sorption of Fe(II) and As(III) on goethite in single- and dual-sorbate systems

Surface chemistry and reactivity of biogenic silica