An important part of our information-gathering behavior has always been to find out what other people think. With the growing availability and popularity of opinion-rich resources such as online review sites and personal blogs, new opportunities and challenges arise as people now can, and do, actively use information technologies to seek out and understand the opinions of others. The sudden eruption of activity in the area of opinion mining and sentiment analysis, which deals with the computational treatment of opinion, sentiment, and subjectivity in text, has thus occurred at least in part as a direct response to the surge of interest in new systems that deal directly with opinions as a first-class object.

This survey covers techniques and approaches that promise to directly enable opinion-oriented information-seeking systems. Our focus is on methods that seek to address the new challenges raised by sentiment-aware applications, as compared to those that are already present in more traditional fact-based analysis. We include material on summarization of evaluative text and on broader issues regarding privacy, manipulation, and economic impact that the development of opinion-oriented information-access services gives rise to. To facilitate future work, a discussion of available resources, benchmark datasets, and evaluation campaigns is also provided.

/pdf/opinion-mining-and-sentiment-analysis-3v5ya3qqiw.pdf

Opinion Mining and Sentiment Analysis

Sentiment analysis and opinion mining is the field of study that analyzes people's opinions, sentiments, evaluations, attitudes, and emotions from written language. It is one of the most active research areas in natural language processing and is also widely studied in data mining, Web mining, and text mining. In fact, this research has spread outside of computer science to the management sciences and social sciences due to its importance to business and society as a whole. The growing importance of sentiment analysis coincides with the growth of social media such as reviews, forum discussions, blogs, micro-blogs, Twitter, and social networks. For the first time in human history, we now have a huge volume of opinionated data recorded in digital form for analysis. Sentiment analysis systems are being applied in almost every business and social domain because opinions are central to almost all human activities and are key influencers of our behaviors. Our beliefs and perceptions of reality, and the choices we make, are largely conditioned on how others see and evaluate the world. For this reason, when we need to make a decision we often seek out the opinions of others. This is true not only for individuals but also for organizations. This book is a comprehensive introductory and survey text. It covers all important topics and the latest developments in the field with over 400 references. It is suitable for students, researchers and practitioners who are interested in social media analysis in general and sentiment analysis in particular. Lecturers can readily use it in class for courses on natural language processing, social media analysis, text mining, and data mining. Lecture slides are also available online.

/pdf/sentiment-analysis-and-opinion-mining-8314pykwrf.pdf

Sentiment Analysis and Opinion Mining

http://cfile28.uf.tistory.com/attach/23159E3D57117DF7107077

Twitter mood predicts the stock market.

Recording of presentation introducing narrative analysis, outlining what it is, why it can be a useful approach, how to do it and where to find out more. Presentation given at methods@manchester seminar at University of Manchester on 4 March 2010.

What is Narrative Analysis

Sentiment analysis algorithms and applications: A survey

OpinionFinder is a system that performs subjectivity analysis, automatically identifying when opinions, sentiments, speculations, and other private states are present in text. Specifically, OpinionFinder aims to identify subjective sentences and to mark various aspects of the subjectivity in these sentences, including the source (holder) of the subjectivity and words that are included in phrases expressing positive or negative sentiments.

/pdf/opinionfinder-a-system-for-subjectivity-analysis-v8dqv6wj31.pdf

OpinionFinder: A System for Subjectivity Analysis

This work explores the utility of sentiment and arguing opinions for classifying stances in ideological debates. In order to capture arguing opinions in ideological stance taking, we construct an arguing lexicon automatically from a manually annotated corpus. We build supervised systems employing sentiment and arguing opinions and their targets as features. Our systems perform substantially better than a distribution-based baseline. Additionally, by employing both types of opinion features, we are able to perform better than a unigram-based system.

/pdf/recognizing-stances-in-ideological-on-line-debates-3yy8mihx1t.pdf

Recognizing Stances in Ideological On-Line Debates

This paper presents an unsupervised opinion analysis method for debate-side classification, i.e., recognizing which stance a person is taking in an online debate. In order to handle the complexities of this genre, we mine the web to learn associations that are indicative of opinion stances in debates. We combine this knowledge with discourse information, and formulate the debate side classification task as an Integer Linear Programming problem. Our results show that our method is substantially better than challenging baseline methods.

/pdf/recognizing-stances-in-online-debates-2s20cfz0fr.pdf

Recognizing Stances in Online Debates

This work investigates design choices in modeling a discourse scheme for improving opinion polarity classification. For this, two diverse global inference paradigms are used: a supervised collective classification framework and an unsupervised optimization framework. Both approaches perform substantially better than baseline approaches, establishing the efficacy of the methods and the underlying discourse scheme. We also present quantitative and qualitative analyses showing how the improvements are achieved.

/pdf/supervised-and-unsupervised-methods-in-employing-discourse-3ixhdtt2hs.pdf

Supervised and Unsupervised Methods in Employing Discourse Relations for Improving Opinion Polarity Classification

This paper analyzes opinion categories like Sentiment and Arguing in meetings. We first annotate the categories manually. We then develop genre-specific lexicons using interesting function word combinations for detecting the opinions. We analyze relations between dialog structure information and opinion expression in context of multiparty discourse. Finally we show that classifiers using lexical and discourse knowledge have significant improvement over baseline.

/pdf/detecting-arguing-and-sentiment-in-meetings-4iwg32rwq9.pdf

Swapna Somasundaran

Papers

OpinionFinder: A System for Subjectivity Analysis

Recognizing Stances in Ideological On-Line Debates

Recognizing Stances in Online Debates

Supervised and Unsupervised Methods in Employing Discourse Relations for Improving Opinion Polarity Classification

Detecting Arguing and Sentiment in Meetings