Recent developments of meshfree and particle methods and their applications in applied mechanics are surveyed. Three major methodologies have been reviewed. First, smoothed particle hydrodynamics ~SPH! is discussed as a representative of a non-local kernel, strong form collocation approach. Second, mesh-free Galerkin methods, which have been an active research area in recent years, are reviewed. Third, some applications of molecular dynamics ~MD! in applied mechanics are discussed. The emphases of this survey are placed on simulations of finite deformations, fracture, strain localization of solids; incompressible as well as compressible flows; and applications of multiscale methods and nano-scale mechanics. This review article includes 397 references. @DOI: 10.1115/1.1431547#

Meshfree and particle methods and their applications

A comparison study of the efficiency and ac- curacy of a variety of meshless trial and test functions is presented in this paper, based on the general concept of the meshless local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) method. 5 types of trial functions, and 6 types of test functions are explored. Different test functions result in different MLPG methods, and six such MLPG methods are pre- sented in this paper. In all these six MLPG methods, absolutely no meshes are needed either for the interpo- lation of the trial and test functions, or for the integration of the weak-form; while other meshless methods require background cells. Because complicated shape functions for the trial function are inevitable at the present stage, in order to develop a fast and robust meshless method, we explore ways to avoid the use of a domain integral in the weak-form, by choosing an appropriate test function. The MLPG5 method (wherein the local, nodal-based test function, over a local sub-domain Ω s (or Ω te) centered at a node, is the Heaviside step function) avoids the need for both a domain integral in the attendant symmetric weak-form as well as a singular integral. Convergence studies in the numerical examples show that all of the MLPG methods possess excellent rates of convergence, for both the unknown variables and their derivatives. An analysis of computational costs shows that the MLPG5 method is less expensive, both in computational costs as well as definitely in human-labor costs, than the FEM, or BEM. Thus, due to its speed, accuracy and robustness, the MLPG5 method may be expected to replace the FEM, in the near future.

The Meshless Local Petrov-Galerkin (MLPG) Method: A Simple \& Less-costly Alternative to the Finite Element and Boundary Element Methods

Strong Formulation Finite Element Method Based on Differential Quadrature: A Survey

This paper gives an overview over Meshfree Methods Starting point is an extended and modified classification of Meshfree Methods due to three aspects: The construction of a partition of unity, the choice of an approximation either with or without using an extrinsic basis and the choice of test functions, resulting into a collocation, Bubnov-Galerkin or Petrov-Galerkin Meshfree Method Most of the relevant Meshfree Methods are described taking into account their different origins and viewpoints as well as their advantages and disadvantages Typical problems arising in meshfree methods like integration, treatment of essential boundary conditions, coupling with mesh-based methods etc~are discussed Some valuing comments about the most important aspects can be found at the end of each section This text was revised in 2004

Classification and Overview of Meshfree Methods

A finite point method, least-squares collocation meshless method, is proposed. Except for the collocation points which are used to construct the trial functions, a number of auxiliary points are also adopted. Unlike the direct collocation method, the equilibrium conditions are satisfied not only at the collocation points but also at the auxiliary points in a least-squares sense. The moving least-squares interpolant is used to construct the trial functions. The computational effort required for the present method is in the same order as that required for the direct collocation, while the present method improves the accuracy of solution significantly. The proposed method does not require any mesh so that it is a truly meshless method. Three numerical examples are studied in detail, which show that the proposed method possesses high accuracy with low computational effort. Copyright © 2001 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Least‐squares collocation meshless method

The meshless method based on the local boundary integral equation (LBIE) is a promising method for solving boundary value problems, using an local unsymmetric weak form and shape functions from the moving least squares approximation. In the present paper, the meshless method based on the LBIE for solving problems in linear elasticity is developed and numerically implemented. The present method is a truly meshless method, as it does not need a “finite element mesh”, either for purposes of interpolation of the solution variables, or for the integration of the energy. All integrals in the formulation can be easily evaluated over regularly shaped domains (in general, spheres in three-dimensional problems) and their boundaries. The essential boundary conditions in the present formulation can be easily imposed even when the non-interpolative moving least squares approximation is used. Several numerical examples are presented to illustrate the implementation and performance of the present method. The numerical examples show that high rates of convergence with mesh refinement for the displacement and energy norms are achievable. No post-processing procedure is required to compute the strain and stress, since the original solution from the present method, using the moving least squares approximation, is already smooth enough.

T. Zhu

Papers

The local boundary integral equation (LBIE) and it's meshless implementation for linear elasticity